Paper detail

Determination of $\varepsilon_K$ using lattice QCD inputs

We present results for the indirect CP violation parameter $\varepsilon_K$ determined directly from the standard model using lattice QCD to fix the inputs $\hat{B}_K$, $ξ_0$, $|V_{us}|$, and $|V_{cb}|$. We use the FLAG and SWME results for $\hat{B}_K$. We use the RBC-UKQCD result for $ξ_0$ determined using the experimental value of $\varepsilon'/\varepsilon$ and the lattice result of $\mathrm{Im}\,A_2$. To set the Wolfenstein parameter $λ$, we use $|V_{us}|$, which is determined from $K_{\ell3}$ and $K_{\mu2}$ decays combined with lattice evaluations of the $K \to π\ell ν$ vector form factor and $f_K$. To set the Wolfenstein parameter $A$, we use the FNAL/MILC results for $|V_{cb}|$, which are determined from the exclusive decay $\bar{B} \to D^* \ell \barν$ and the axial form factor at zero recoil. We also use the inclusive $|V_{cb}|$ obtained using the heavy quark expansion based on QCD sum rules and the OPE. We compare the results with those for exclusive $|V_{cb}|$. We find that the standard model prediction of $\varepsilon_K$ with exclusive $|V_{cb}|$ (lattice QCD results) is lower than the experimental value by 3.4$σ$. However, we observe no tension in $\varepsilon_K$ determined from inclusive $|V_{cb}|$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.