BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Xiaoda Xu

Xiaoda Xu appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.STStatistics Theorymath.PRmath.NANumerical Analysis

Catalog footprint

What is connected

6works
5topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Expected star discrepancy based on stratified sampling

We present two main contributions to the expected star discrepancy theory. First, we derive a sharper expected upper bound for jittered sampling, improving the leading constants and logarithmic terms compared to the state-of-the-art [Doerr, 2022]. Second, we prove the strong partition principle for star discrepancy, showing that any equal-measure stratified sampling yields a strictly smaller expected discrepancy than simple random sampling, thereby resolving an open question in [Kiderlen and Pausinger, 2022]. Numerical simulations confirm our theoretical advances and illustrate the superiority of stratified sampling in low to moderate dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

On a Class of Partitions with Lower Expected Star Discrepancy and Its Upper Bound than Jittered Sampling

We investigate the expected star discrepancy under a newly designed class of convex equivolume partition models. The main contributions are two-fold. First, we establish a strong partition principle for the star discrepancy, showing that our newly designed partitions yield stratified sampling point sets with lower expected star discrepancy than both classical jittered sampling and simple random sampling. Specifically, we prove that $\mathbb{E}(D^{*}_{N}(Z))\leq\mathbb{E}(D^{*}_{N}(Y))<\mathbb{E}(D^{*}_{N}(X))$, where $X$, $Y$, and $Z$ represent simple random sampling, jittered sampling, and our new partition sampling, respectively. Second, we derive explicit upper bounds for the expected star discrepancy under our partition models, which improve upon existing bounds for jittered sampling. Our results resolve Open Question 2 posed in Kiderlen and Pausinger (2021) regarding the strong partition principle for star discrepancy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Sharp Non-Asymptotic Bounds for the Star Discrepancy of Double-Infinite Random Matrices via Optimal Covering Numbers

We establish sharp non-asymptotic probabilistic bounds for the star discrepancy of double-infinite random matrices -- a canonical model for sequences of random point sets in high dimensions. By integrating the recently proved \textbf{optimal covering numbers for axis-parallel boxes} (Gnewuch, 2024) into the dyadic chaining framework, we achieve \textbf{explicitly computable constants} that improve upon all previously known bounds. For dimension $d \ge 3$, we prove that with high probability, \[ D_N^d \le \sqrt{αA_d + βB \frac{\ln \log_2 N}{d}} \sqrt{\frac{d}{N}}, \] where $A_d$ is given by an explicit series and satisfies $A_3 \le 745$, a \textbf{14\% improvement} over the previous best constant of 868 (Fiedler et al., 2023). For $d=2$, we obtain the currently smallest known constant $A_2 \le 915$. Our analysis reveals a \textbf{precise trade-off} between the dimensional dependence and the logarithmic factor in $N$, highlighting how optimal covering estimates directly translate to tighter discrepancy bounds. These results immediately yield improved error guarantees for \textbf{quasi-Monte Carlo integration, uncertainty quantification, and high-dimensional sampling}, and provide a new benchmark for the probabilistic analysis of geometric discrepancy. \textbf{Keywords:} Star discrepancy, double-infinite random matrices, covering numbers, dyadic chaining, high-dimensional integration, quasi-Monte Carlo, probabilistic bounds.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2026arXiv

Weighted $L_p$-Discrepancy Bounds for Parametric Stratified Sampling and Applications to High-Dimensional Integration

This paper studies the expected $L_p$-discrepancy ($2 \leq p < \infty$) for stratified sampling schemes under importance sampling. We introduce a parametric family of equivolume partitions $Ω_{θ,\sim}$ and leverage recent exact formulas for the expected $L_2$-discrepancy \cite{xian2025improved}. Our main contribution is a weighted discrepancy reduction lemma that relates weighted $L_p$-discrepancy to standard $L_p$-discrepancy with explicit constants depending on the weight function. For $p=2$, we obtain explicit bounds using the exact discrepancy formulas. For $p>2$, we derive probabilistic bounds via dyadic chaining techniques. The results yield uniform error estimates for multivariate integration in Sobolev spaces $\mathcal{H}^1(K)$ and $F^*_{d,q}$, demonstrating improved performance over classical jittered sampling in importance sampling scenarios. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical findings and illustrate the practical advantages of parametric stratified sampling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Expected $L_2-$discrepancy bound for a class of new stratified sampling models

We introduce a class of convex equivolume partitions. Expected $L_2-$discrepancy are discussed under these partitions. There are two main results. First, under this kind of partitions, we generate random point sets with smaller expected $L_2-$discrepancy than classical jittered sampling for the same sampling number. Second, an explicit expected $L_2-$discrepancy upper bound under this kind of partitions is also given. Further, among these new partitions, there is optimal expected $L_2-$discrepancy upper bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Star discrepancy for new stratified random sampling I: optimal expected star discrepancy

We introduce a class of convex equivolume partitions. Expected star discrepancy results are compared for stratified samples under these partitions, including simple random samples. There are four main parts of our results. First, among these newly designed partitions, there is one that minimizes the expected star discrepancy, thus we partly answer an open question in [F. Pausinger, S. Steinerberger, J. Complex. 2016]. Second, there are an infinite number of such class of partitions, which generate point sets with smaller expected discrepancy than classical jittered sampling for large sampling number, leading to an open question in [M. Kiderlen, F. Pausinger, Monatsh. Math. 2021] being solved. Third, we prove a strong partition principle and generalize the expected star discrepancy under these partition models from $L_2-$discrepancy to star discrepancy, hence an open question in [M. Kiderlen, F. Pausinger, J. Complex. 2021] is answered. In the end, optimal expected star discrepancy upper bound under this class of partitions is given, which is better than using jittered sampling.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access