Paper detail

Weighted $L_p$-Discrepancy Bounds for Parametric Stratified Sampling and Applications to High-Dimensional Integration

This paper studies the expected $L_p$-discrepancy ($2 \leq p < \infty$) for stratified sampling schemes under importance sampling. We introduce a parametric family of equivolume partitions $Ω_{θ,\sim}$ and leverage recent exact formulas for the expected $L_2$-discrepancy \cite{xian2025improved}. Our main contribution is a weighted discrepancy reduction lemma that relates weighted $L_p$-discrepancy to standard $L_p$-discrepancy with explicit constants depending on the weight function. For $p=2$, we obtain explicit bounds using the exact discrepancy formulas. For $p>2$, we derive probabilistic bounds via dyadic chaining techniques. The results yield uniform error estimates for multivariate integration in Sobolev spaces $\mathcal{H}^1(K)$ and $F^*_{d,q}$, demonstrating improved performance over classical jittered sampling in importance sampling scenarios. Numerical experiments validate our theoretical findings and illustrate the practical advantages of parametric stratified sampling.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.