Paper detail

Star discrepancy for new stratified random sampling I: optimal expected star discrepancy

We introduce a class of convex equivolume partitions. Expected star discrepancy results are compared for stratified samples under these partitions, including simple random samples. There are four main parts of our results. First, among these newly designed partitions, there is one that minimizes the expected star discrepancy, thus we partly answer an open question in [F. Pausinger, S. Steinerberger, J. Complex. 2016]. Second, there are an infinite number of such class of partitions, which generate point sets with smaller expected discrepancy than classical jittered sampling for large sampling number, leading to an open question in [M. Kiderlen, F. Pausinger, Monatsh. Math. 2021] being solved. Third, we prove a strong partition principle and generalize the expected star discrepancy under these partition models from $L_2-$discrepancy to star discrepancy, hence an open question in [M. Kiderlen, F. Pausinger, J. Complex. 2021] is answered. In the end, optimal expected star discrepancy upper bound under this class of partitions is given, which is better than using jittered sampling.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.