Paper detail

Sharp Non-Asymptotic Bounds for the Star Discrepancy of Double-Infinite Random Matrices via Optimal Covering Numbers

We establish sharp non-asymptotic probabilistic bounds for the star discrepancy of double-infinite random matrices -- a canonical model for sequences of random point sets in high dimensions. By integrating the recently proved \textbf{optimal covering numbers for axis-parallel boxes} (Gnewuch, 2024) into the dyadic chaining framework, we achieve \textbf{explicitly computable constants} that improve upon all previously known bounds. For dimension $d \ge 3$, we prove that with high probability, \[ D_N^d \le \sqrt{αA_d + βB \frac{\ln \log_2 N}{d}} \sqrt{\frac{d}{N}}, \] where $A_d$ is given by an explicit series and satisfies $A_3 \le 745$, a \textbf{14\% improvement} over the previous best constant of 868 (Fiedler et al., 2023). For $d=2$, we obtain the currently smallest known constant $A_2 \le 915$. Our analysis reveals a \textbf{precise trade-off} between the dimensional dependence and the logarithmic factor in $N$, highlighting how optimal covering estimates directly translate to tighter discrepancy bounds. These results immediately yield improved error guarantees for \textbf{quasi-Monte Carlo integration, uncertainty quantification, and high-dimensional sampling}, and provide a new benchmark for the probabilistic analysis of geometric discrepancy. \textbf{Keywords:} Star discrepancy, double-infinite random matrices, covering numbers, dyadic chaining, high-dimensional integration, quasi-Monte Carlo, probabilistic bounds.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.