Researcher profile

Tobin Isaac

Tobin Isaac contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
7topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Inferring ice sheet damage models from limited observations using CRIKit: the Constitutive Relation Inference Toolkit

We examine the prospect of learning ice sheet damage models from observational data. Our approach, implemented in CRIKit (the Constitutive Relation Inference Toolkit), is to model the material time derivative of damage as a frame-invariant neural network, and to optimize the parameters of the model from simulations of the flow of an ice dome. Using the model of Albrecht and Levermann as the ground truth to generate synthetic observations, we measure the difference of optimized neural network models from that model to try to understand how well this process generates models that can then transfer to other ice sheet simulations. The use of so-called "deep-learning" models for constitutive equations, equations of state, sub-grid-scale processes, and other pointwise relations that appear in systems of PDEs has been successful in other disciplines, yet our inference setting has some confounding factors. The first is the type of observations that are available: we compare the quality of the inferred models when the loss of the numerical simulations includes observation misfits throughout the ice, which is unobtainable in real settings, to losses that include only combinations of surface and borehole observations. The second confounding factor is the evolution of damage in an ice sheet, which is advection dominated. The non-local effect of perturbations in a damage models results in loss functions that have both many local minima and many parameter configurations for which the system is unsolvable. Our experience suggests that basic neural networks have several deficiencies that affect the quality of the optimized models. We suggest several approaches to incorporating additional inductive biases into neural networks which may lead to better performance in future work.

preprint2022arXiv

Robust Expected Information Gain for Optimal Bayesian Experimental Design Using Ambiguity Sets

The ranking of experiments by expected information gain (EIG) in Bayesian experimental design is sensitive to changes in the model's prior distribution, and the approximation of EIG yielded by sampling will have errors similar to the use of a perturbed prior. We define and analyze \emph{robust expected information gain} (REIG), a modification of the objective in EIG maximization by minimizing an affine relaxation of EIG over an ambiguity set of distributions that are close to the original prior in KL-divergence. We show that, when combined with a sampling-based approach to estimating EIG, REIG corresponds to a `log-sum-exp' stabilization of the samples used to estimate EIG, meaning that it can be efficiently implemented in practice. Numerical tests combining REIG with variational nested Monte Carlo (VNMC), adaptive contrastive estimation (ACE) and mutual information neural estimation (MINE) suggest that in practice REIG also compensates for the variability of under-sampled estimators.

preprint2020arXiv

Recursive, parameter-free, explicitly defined interpolation nodes for simplices

A rule for constructing interpolation nodes for $n$th degree polynomials on the simplex is presented. These nodes are simple to define recursively from families of 1D node sets, such as the Lobatto-Gauss-Legendre (LGL) nodes. The resulting nodes have attractive properties: they are fully symmetric, they match the 1D family used in construction on the edges of the simplex, and the nodes constructed for the $(d-1)$-simplex are the boundary traces of the nodes constructed for the $d$-simplex. When compared using the Lebesgue constant to other explicit rules for defining interpolation nodes, the nodes recursively constructed from LGL nodes are nearly as good as the "warp & blend" nodes of Warburton in 2D (which, though defined differently, are very similar), and in 3D are better than other known explicit rules by increasing margins for $n > 6$. By that same measure, these recursively defined nodes are not as good as implicitly defined nodes found by optimizing the Lebesgue constant or related functions, but such optimal node sets have yet to be computed for the tetrahedron. A reference python implementation has been distributed as the `recursivenodes` package, but the simplicity of the recursive construction makes them easy to implement.