Paper detail

Inferring ice sheet damage models from limited observations using CRIKit: the Constitutive Relation Inference Toolkit

We examine the prospect of learning ice sheet damage models from observational data. Our approach, implemented in CRIKit (the Constitutive Relation Inference Toolkit), is to model the material time derivative of damage as a frame-invariant neural network, and to optimize the parameters of the model from simulations of the flow of an ice dome. Using the model of Albrecht and Levermann as the ground truth to generate synthetic observations, we measure the difference of optimized neural network models from that model to try to understand how well this process generates models that can then transfer to other ice sheet simulations. The use of so-called "deep-learning" models for constitutive equations, equations of state, sub-grid-scale processes, and other pointwise relations that appear in systems of PDEs has been successful in other disciplines, yet our inference setting has some confounding factors. The first is the type of observations that are available: we compare the quality of the inferred models when the loss of the numerical simulations includes observation misfits throughout the ice, which is unobtainable in real settings, to losses that include only combinations of surface and borehole observations. The second confounding factor is the evolution of damage in an ice sheet, which is advection dominated. The non-local effect of perturbations in a damage models results in loss functions that have both many local minima and many parameter configurations for which the system is unsolvable. Our experience suggests that basic neural networks have several deficiencies that affect the quality of the optimized models. We suggest several approaches to incorporating additional inductive biases into neural networks which may lead to better performance in future work.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.