Researcher profile

Subhash Suri

Subhash Suri contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Multiwinner Elections under Minimax Chamberlin-Courant Rule in Euclidean Space

We consider multiwinner elections in Euclidean space using the minimax Chamberlin-Courant rule. In this setting, voters and candidates are embedded in a $d$-dimensional Euclidean space, and the goal is to choose a committee of $k$ candidates so that the rank of any voter's most preferred candidate in the committee is minimized. (The problem is also equivalent to the ordinal version of the classical $k$-center problem.) We show that the problem is NP-hard in any dimension $d \geq 2$, and also provably hard to approximate. Our main results are three polynomial-time approximation schemes, each of which finds a committee with provably good minimax score. In all cases, we show that our approximation bounds are tight or close to tight. We mainly focus on the $1$-Borda rule but some of our results also hold for the more general $r$-Borda.

preprint2022arXiv

Point Separation and Obstacle Removal by Finding and Hitting Odd Cycles

Suppose we are given a pair of points $s, t$ and a set $S$ of $n$ geometric objects in the plane, called obstacles. We show that in polynomial time one can construct an auxiliary (multi-)graph $G$ with vertex set $S$ and every edge labeled from $\{0, 1\}$, such that a set $S_d \subseteq S$ of obstacles separates $s$ from $t$ if and only if $G[S_d]$ contains a cycle whose sum of labels is odd. Using this structural characterization of separating sets of obstacles we obtain the following algorithmic results. In the Obstacle-Removal problem the task is to find a curve in the plane connecting s to t intersecting at most q obstacles. We give a $2.3146^qn^{O(1)}$ algorithm for Obstacle-Removal, significantly improving upon the previously best known $q^{O(q^3)} n^{O(1)}$ algorithm of Eiben and Lokshtanov (SoCG'20). We also obtain an alternative proof of a constant factor approximation algorithm for Obstacle-Removal, substantially simplifying the arguments of Kumar et al. (SODA'21). In the Generalized Points-Separation problem, the input consists of the set S of obstacles, a point set A of k points and p pairs $(s_1, t_1),... (s_p, t_p)$ of points from A. The task is to find a minimum subset $S_r \subseteq S$ such that for every $i$, every curve from $s_i$ to $t_i$ intersects at least one obstacle in $S_r$. We obtain $2^{O(p)} n^{O(k)}$-time algorithm for Generalized Points-Separation problem. This resolves an open problem of Cabello and Giannopoulos (SoCG'13), who asked about the existence of such an algorithm for the special case where $(s_1, t_1), ... (s_p, t_p)$ contains all the pairs of points in A. Finally, we improve the running time of our algorithm to $f(p,k) n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ when the obstacles are unit disks, where $f(p,k) = 2^O(p) k^{O(k)}$, and show that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), the running time dependence on $k$ of our algorithms is essentially optimal.

preprint2021arXiv

The Maximum Exposure Problem

Given a set of points $P$ and axis-aligned rectangles $\mathcal{R}$ in the plane, a point $p \in P$ is called \emph{exposed} if it lies outside all rectangles in $\mathcal{R}$. In the \emph{max-exposure problem}, given an integer parameter $k$, we want to delete $k$ rectangles from $\mathcal{R}$ so as to maximize the number of exposed points. We show that the problem is NP-hard and assuming plausible complexity conjectures is also hard to approximate even when rectangles in $\mathcal{R}$ are translates of two fixed rectangles. However, if $\mathcal{R}$ only consists of translates of a single rectangle, we present a polynomial-time approximation scheme. For range space defined by general rectangles, we present a simple $O(k)$ bicriteria approximation algorithm; that is by deleting $O(k^2)$ rectangles, we can expose at least $Ω(1/k)$ of the optimal number of points.

preprint2020arXiv

Dynamic geometric set cover and hitting set

We investigate dynamic versions of geometric set cover and hitting set where points and ranges may be inserted or deleted, and we want to efficiently maintain an (approximately) optimal solution for the current problem instance. While their static versions have been extensively studied in the past, surprisingly little is known about dynamic geometric set cover and hitting set. For instance, even for the most basic case of one-dimensional interval set cover and hitting set, no nontrivial results were known. The main contribution of our paper are two frameworks that lead to efficient data structures for dynamically maintaining set covers and hitting sets in $\mathbb{R}^1$ and $\mathbb{R}^2$. The first framework uses bootstrapping and gives a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate data structure for dynamic interval set cover in $\mathbb{R}^1$ with $O(n^α/\varepsilon)$ amortized update time for any constant $α> 0$; in $\mathbb{R}^2$, this method gives $O(1)$-approximate data structures for unit-square (and quadrant) set cover and hitting set with $O(n^{1/2+α})$ amortized update time. The second framework uses local modification, and leads to a $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximate data structure for dynamic interval hitting set in $\mathbb{R}^1$ with $\widetilde{O}(1/\varepsilon)$ amortized update time; in $\mathbb{R}^2$, it gives $O(1)$-approximate data structures for unit-square (and quadrant) set cover and hitting set in the \textit{partially} dynamic settings with $\widetilde{O}(1)$ amortized update time.