Paper detail

Point Separation and Obstacle Removal by Finding and Hitting Odd Cycles

Suppose we are given a pair of points $s, t$ and a set $S$ of $n$ geometric objects in the plane, called obstacles. We show that in polynomial time one can construct an auxiliary (multi-)graph $G$ with vertex set $S$ and every edge labeled from $\{0, 1\}$, such that a set $S_d \subseteq S$ of obstacles separates $s$ from $t$ if and only if $G[S_d]$ contains a cycle whose sum of labels is odd. Using this structural characterization of separating sets of obstacles we obtain the following algorithmic results. In the Obstacle-Removal problem the task is to find a curve in the plane connecting s to t intersecting at most q obstacles. We give a $2.3146^qn^{O(1)}$ algorithm for Obstacle-Removal, significantly improving upon the previously best known $q^{O(q^3)} n^{O(1)}$ algorithm of Eiben and Lokshtanov (SoCG'20). We also obtain an alternative proof of a constant factor approximation algorithm for Obstacle-Removal, substantially simplifying the arguments of Kumar et al. (SODA'21). In the Generalized Points-Separation problem, the input consists of the set S of obstacles, a point set A of k points and p pairs $(s_1, t_1),... (s_p, t_p)$ of points from A. The task is to find a minimum subset $S_r \subseteq S$ such that for every $i$, every curve from $s_i$ to $t_i$ intersects at least one obstacle in $S_r$. We obtain $2^{O(p)} n^{O(k)}$-time algorithm for Generalized Points-Separation problem. This resolves an open problem of Cabello and Giannopoulos (SoCG'13), who asked about the existence of such an algorithm for the special case where $(s_1, t_1), ... (s_p, t_p)$ contains all the pairs of points in A. Finally, we improve the running time of our algorithm to $f(p,k) n^{O(\sqrt{k})}$ when the obstacles are unit disks, where $f(p,k) = 2^O(p) k^{O(k)}$, and show that, assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH), the running time dependence on $k$ of our algorithms is essentially optimal.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.