Researcher profile

Slim Tayachi

Slim Tayachi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Existence and regularity of source-type self-similar solutions for stable thin-film equations

We investigate the existence and the boundary regularity of source-type self-similar solutions to the thin-film equation $h_t=-(h^nh_{zzz})_z+(h^{n+3})_{zz},$ $ t>0,\; z\in \mathbb{R};\; h(0,z)= ωδ(z)$ where $n\in (\frac{3}{2},3),\; ω> 0$ and $δ$ is the Dirac mass at the origin. It is known that the leading order expansion near the edge of the support coincides with that of a traveling-wave solution for the standard thin-film equation: $h_t=-(h^nh_{zzz})_z$. In this paper we sharpen this result, proving that the higher order corrections are analytic with respect to three variables: the first one is just the {spatial} variable, whereas the second and the third (except for $n = 2$) are irrational powers of it. It is known that this third variable does not appear for the thin-film equation without gravity.

preprint2015arXiv

Existence of a Stable Blow-up profile for the nonlinear heat equation with a critical power nonlinear gradient term

We consider the nonlinear heat equation with a nonlinear gradient term: $\partial_t u =Δu+μ|\nabla u|^q+|u|^{p-1}u,\; μ>0,\; q=2p/(p+1),\; p>3,\; t\in (0,T),\; x\in \R^N.$ We construct a solution which blows up in finite time $T>0.$ We also give a sharp description of its blow-up profile and show that it is stable with respect to perturbations in initial data. The proof relies on the reduction of the problem to a finite dimensional one, and uses the index theory to conclude. The blow-up profile does not scale as $(T-t)^{1/2}|\log(T-t)|^{1/2},$ like in the standard nonlinear heat equation, i.e. $μ=0,$ but as $(T-t)^{1/2}|\log(T-t)|^β$ with $β=(p+1)/[2(p-1)]>1/2.$ We also show that $u$ and $\nabla u$ blow up simultaneously and at a single point, and give the final profile. In particular, the final profile is more singular than the case of the standard nonlinear heat equation.

preprint2015arXiv

Improved conditions for single-point blow-up in reaction-diffusion systems

We study positive blowing-up solutions of the system: $$u_{t}-δΔu=v^p,\,\,\, v_{t}-Δv=u^{q},$$ as well as of some more general systems. For any $p,\,q>1$, we prove single-point blow-up for any radially decreasing, positive and classical solution in a ball. This improves on previously known results in 3 directions: (i) no type I blow-up assumption is made (and it is known that this property may fail); (ii) no equidiffusivity is assumed, i.e. any $δ>0$ is allowed; (iii) a large class of nonlinearities $F(u,v)$, $G(u,v)$ can be handled, which need not follow a precise power behavior. As side result, we also obtain lower pointwise estimates for the final blow-up profiles.

preprint2015arXiv

Single-point blow-up for parabolic systems with exponential nonlinearities and unequal diffusivities

We study positive blowing-up solutions of systems of the form: $$u_t=δ_1 Δu+e^{pv},\quad v_t= δ_2Δv+e^{qu},$$ with $δ_1,δ_2>0$ and $p, q>0$. We prove single-point blow-up for large classes of radially decreasing solutions. This answers a question left open in a paper of Friedman and Giga~(1987), where the result was obtained only for the equidiffusive case $δ_1=δ_2$ and the proof depended crucially on this assumption.