BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Serge Galam

Serge Galam contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phmath.DSSocial and Information NetworksData Structures and AlgorithmsDigital LibrariesDiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
7works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

7 published item(s)

preprint2024arXiv

Fake news: No ban, No spread -- with Sequestration

Fake news is today a major threat to free and democratic making of public opinion. To curb their spread, all efforts by institutions and policy makers rely mainly on imposing restriction, prohibition and fact checking sites, which end up to an effective limitation of freedom of speech. This policy of prohibition, supported by a wide consensus, has been recently broken by the controversial policy applied by Elon Musk to regulate the social media X, with a backlash accusing him of promoting hate speech. Here, notwithstanding these two policies, I explore another avenue denoted ``No ban, No spread - with Sequestration", which amounts at the same time preserving full freedom of speech and neutralization of fake news impact. To investigate the feasibility of my proposal, I tackle the issue within the Galam model of opinion dynamics. In addition to the basic ingredients of the model, I explore for the first time the effect on the dynamics of opinion of a simultaneous activation of prejudice tie breaking and contrarian behavior. The results show that indeed most pieces of fake news do not propagate beyond small groups of people and thus pose no global threat. However, I have unveiled some peculiar sets of parameters for which fake news, even if initially shared by only a handful of agents, spreads ``naturally" to invade a whole community with no resistance. Based on these findings, I am able to outline a path to neutralize such invasive fake news by blocking "naturally" its spread, effectively sequestering it in very small social networks of people. The scheme relies on reshaping the social geometry of the landscape in which fake news evolves. No prohibition is required with fake news left free to prosper but being sequestrated. Next challenging step will be designing measures to implement the model's findings into the real world of social media.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2024arXiv

Measuring the Subjective Passage of Time

I address the question of measuring the subjective perception of the passage of time at the individual level in relation to its objective duration using a physicist-type treatment. A simple model is thus built in terms of a very small number of equations, which is found to yield a quantitative framework for individual subjective perception of time. Given an objective unit of time like the year, the hypothesis is to introduce a subjective unit of time for each person, which is inversely proportional to the number of objective units already experienced by that person. A power law is also considered. The model is then implemented by stacking individual clocks, each being linked to social rituals, which mark and shape the specific time of an individual throughout their life. For each person, the first of these events is their own birth. A future horizon, as well as an origin of the past, are then defined, along with a speed of subjective passage of time. The model shows that the price for the first ritualized socialization is to exit eternity in terms of a future to be lived with the simultaneous reward of experiencing a moment of infinity analogous to that of birth. The results recover common feelings about the passage of time over a lifetime. In particular, the fact that time passes more quickly with age.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

After 2018 Bolsonaro victory, is a 2022 remake feasible?

We propose a contagion model to describe the evolution of the political voting trends in Brazil after the dictatorship from 1985 to nowadays. We consider a fully-connected population divided in two voting groups, left and right. Each group includes three kinds of agents, sensitives, inflexibles and radicals. While sensitives may shift their left or right voting, inflexibles and radicals do not. Excluding political interactions with radicals, the model has one interaction parameter, and we found the values which reproduce all the voting outcomes of past presidential elections from 1989 till 2018. As an alternative approach to explain 2018 election, we found that adding an empty third voting group overlapping left and right, the populist voting group, can also yield Bolsonaro 2018 victory. The initial filling of the populist group is triggered by the breaking of the interaction barrier between sensitives and radicals, which had prevailed for decades. Within each voting group, some of the interacting pairs sensitive/radical recast the sensitive into a populist. This status change from sensitive to populist allows the populist to interact with sensitives of both left and right, thus creating an additional source of filling of the populist group. The process is shown to yield the 2018 $55\%$ for Bolsonaro. From the 2018 distribution of votes, we evaluate the parameter changes which recover the recent 2021 poll yielding a victory of Lula against Bolsonaro at a score of 64/36. Thus, we compare the results for the two scenarios, with and without populists, for 2018 election and 2021 poll. Regarding the two possible scenarios for the 2018 Bolsonaro victory, we discuss about a hypothetic Lula/Bolsonaro 2022 second round voting and the requirements to yield either Lula or Bolsonaro victory in 2022. Both scenarios are feasible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Deviations from the Majority: A Local Flip Model

We study the effect of probabilistic distortions to the local majority rules used in the Galam model of opinion dynamics and bottom-up hierarchical voting. A different probability for a flip against the local majority within the discussion group is associated with each ratio of majority / minority. The cases of groups of sizes 3 and 5 are investigated in detail. For hierarchical voting, the local flip corresponds to a `faithless elector', a representative who decides to vote against the choice of their electing group. Depending on the flip probabilities, the model exhibits a rich variety of patterns for the dynamics, which include novel features in the topology of the landscape. In particular, for size 5, we uncover for the first time an interplay between five fixed points, which split into either three attractors and two tipping points or two attractors and three tipping points, depending on the flip probabilities. Larger groups are also analysed. These features were absent in the former versions of the Galam model, which has at maximum three fixed points for any group size. The results shed a new light on a series of social phenomena triggered by one single individual who acts against the local majority.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Radicalism: The asymmetric stance of Radicals versus Conventionals

We study the conditions of propagation of an initial emergent practice qualified as extremist within a population adept at a practice perceived as moderate, whether political, societal or religious. The extremist practice is carried by an initially ultra-minority of Radicals (R) dispersed among Conventionals (C) who are the overwhelming majority in the community. Both R and C are followers, that is, agents who, while having arguments to legitimize their current practice, are likely to switch to the other practice if given more arguments during a debate. The issue being controversial, most C tend to avoid social confrontation with R about it. They maintain a neutral indifference assuming it is none of their business. On the contrary, R aim to convince C through an expansion strategy to spread their practice as part of a collective agenda. However, aware of being followers, they implement an appropriate strategy to maximize their expansion and determine when to force a debate with C. The effect of this asymmetry between initiating or avoiding an update debate among followers is calculated using a weighted version of the Galam model of opinion dynamics. An underlying complex landscape is obtained as a function of the respective probabilities to engage in a local discussion by R and C. It discloses zones where R inexorably expand and zones where they get extinct. The results highlight the instrumental character of above asymmetry in providing a decisive advantage to R against C. It also points to a barrier in R initial support to reach the extension zone. In parallel, the landscape reveals a path for C to counter R expansion pushing them back into their extinction zone. It relies on the asymmetry of C being initially a large majority which puts the required involvement of C at a rather low level.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Crediting multi-authored papers to single authors

A fair assignment of credit for multi-authored publications is a long-standing issue in scientometrics. In the calculation of the $h$-index, for instance, all co-authors receive equal credit for a given publication, independent of a given author's contribution to the work or of the total number of co-authors. Several attempts have been made to distribute the credit in a more appropriate manner. In a recent paper, Hirsch has suggested a new way of credit assignment that is fundamentally different from the previous ones: All credit for a multi-author paper goes to a single author, the called ``$α$-author'', defined as the person with the highest current $h$-index not the highest $h$-index at the time of the paper's publication) (J. E. Hirsch, Scientometrics 118, 673 (2019)). The collection of papers this author has received credit for as $α$-author is then used to calculate a new index, $h_α$, following the same recipe as for the usual $h$ index. The objective of this new assignment is not a fairer distribution of credit, but rather the determination of an altogether different property, the degree of a person's scientific leadership. We show that given the complex time dependence of $h$ for individual scientists, the approach of using the current $h$ value instead of the historic one is problematic, and we argue that it would be feasible to determine the $α$-author at the time of the paper's publication instead. On the other hand, there are other practical considerations that make the calculation of the proposed $h_α$ very difficult. As an alternative, we explore other ways of crediting papers to a single author in order to test early career achievement or scientific leadership.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Fake news and rumors: a trigger for proliferation or fading away

The dynamics of fake news and rumor spreading is investigated using a model with three kinds of agents who are respectively the Seeds, the Agnostics and the Others. While Seeds are the ones who start spreading the rumor being adamantly convinced of its truth, Agnostics reject any kind of rumor and do not believe in conspiracy theories. In between, the Others constitute the main part of the community. While Seeds are always Believers and Agnostics are always Indifferents, Others can switch between being Believer and Indifferent depending on who they are discussing with. The underlying driving dynamics is implemented via local updates of randomly formed groups of agents. In each group, an Other turns into a Believer as soon as $m$ or more Believers are present in the group. However, since some Believers may lose interest in the rumor as time passes by, we add a flipping fixed rate $0<d<1$ from Believers into Indifferents. Rigorous analysis of the associated dynamics reveals that switching from $m=1$ to $m\ge2$ triggers a drastic qualitative change in the spreading process. When $m=1$ even a small group of Believers may manage to convince a large part of the community very quickly. In contrast, for $m\ge 2$, even a substantial fraction of Believers does not prevent the rumor dying out after a few update rounds. Our results provide an explanation on why a given rumor spreads within a social group and not in another, and also why some rumors will not spread in neither groups.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access