Researcher profile

Ahad N. Zehmakan

Ahad N. Zehmakan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 15 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
3works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Spread of Influence in Graphs

Consider a graph $G$ and an initial configuration where each node is black or white. Assume that in each round all nodes simultaneously update their color based on a predefined rule. One can think of graph $G$ as a social network, where each black/white node represents an individual who holds a positive/negative opinion regarding a particular topic. In the $r$-threshold (resp. $α$-threshold) model, a node becomes black if at least $r$ of its neighbors (resp. $α$ fraction of its neighbors) are black, and white otherwise. The $r$-monotone (resp. $α$-monotone) model is the same as the $r$-threshold (resp. $α$-threshold) model, except that a black node remains black forever. What is the number of rounds that the process needs to stabilize? How many nodes must be black initially so that black color takes over or survives? Our main goal in the present paper is to address these two questions

preprint2020arXiv

Transition Operations over Plane Trees

The operation of transforming one spanning tree into another by replacing an edge has been considered widely, both for general and planar straight-line graphs. For the latter, several variants have been studied (e.g., edge slides and edge rotations). In a transition graph on the set $\mathcal{T}(S)$ of noncrossing straight-line spanning trees on a finite point set $S$ in the plane, two spanning trees are connected by an edge if one can be transformed into the other by such an operation. We study bounds on the diameter of these graphs, and consider the various operations on point sets in both general position and convex position. In addition, we address variants of the problem where operations may be performed simultaneously or the edges are labeled. We prove new lower and upper bounds for the diameters of the corresponding transition graphs and pose open problems.

preprint2019arXiv

Fake news and rumors: a trigger for proliferation or fading away

The dynamics of fake news and rumor spreading is investigated using a model with three kinds of agents who are respectively the Seeds, the Agnostics and the Others. While Seeds are the ones who start spreading the rumor being adamantly convinced of its truth, Agnostics reject any kind of rumor and do not believe in conspiracy theories. In between, the Others constitute the main part of the community. While Seeds are always Believers and Agnostics are always Indifferents, Others can switch between being Believer and Indifferent depending on who they are discussing with. The underlying driving dynamics is implemented via local updates of randomly formed groups of agents. In each group, an Other turns into a Believer as soon as $m$ or more Believers are present in the group. However, since some Believers may lose interest in the rumor as time passes by, we add a flipping fixed rate $0<d<1$ from Believers into Indifferents. Rigorous analysis of the associated dynamics reveals that switching from $m=1$ to $m\ge2$ triggers a drastic qualitative change in the spreading process. When $m=1$ even a small group of Believers may manage to convince a large part of the community very quickly. In contrast, for $m\ge 2$, even a substantial fraction of Believers does not prevent the rumor dying out after a few update rounds. Our results provide an explanation on why a given rumor spreads within a social group and not in another, and also why some rumors will not spread in neither groups.