BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ronald DeVore

Ronald DeVore contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Neural Network Approximation

Neural Networks (NNs) are the method of choice for building learning algorithms. Their popularity stems from their empirical success on several challenging learning problems. However, most scholars agree that a convincing theoretical explanation for this success is still lacking. This article surveys the known approximation properties of the outputs of NNs with the aim of uncovering the properties that are not present in the more traditional methods of approximation used in numerical analysis. Comparisons are made with traditional approximation methods from the viewpoint of rate distortion. Another major component in the analysis of numerical approximation is the computational time needed to construct the approximation and this in turn is intimately connected with the stability of the approximation algorithm. So the stability of numerical approximation using NNs is a large part of the analysis put forward. The survey, for the most part, is concerned with NNs using the popular ReLU activation function. In this case, the outputs of the NNs are piecewise linear functions on rather complicated partitions of the domain of $f$ into cells that are convex polytopes. When the architecture of the NN is fixed and the parameters are allowed to vary, the set of output functions of the NN is a parameterized nonlinear manifold. It is shown that this manifold has certain space filling properties leading to an increased ability to approximate (better rate distortion) but at the expense of numerical stability. The space filling creates a challenge to the numerical method in finding best or good parameter choices when trying to approximate.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Nonlinear Methods for Model Reduction

The usual approach to model reduction for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) is to construct a linear space $V_n$ which approximates well the solution manifold $\mathcal{M}$ consisting of all solutions $u(y)$ with $y$ the vector of parameters. This linear reduced model $V_n$ is then used for various tasks such as building an online forward solver for the PDE or estimating parameters from data observations. It is well understood in other problems of numerical computation that nonlinear methods such as adaptive approximation, $n$-term approximation, and certain tree-based methods may provide improved numerical efficiency. For model reduction, a nonlinear method would replace the linear space $V_n$ by a nonlinear space $Σ_n$. This idea has already been suggested in recent papers on model reduction where the parameter domain is decomposed into a finite number of cells and a linear space of low dimension is assigned to each cell. Up to this point, little is known in terms of performance guarantees for such a nonlinear strategy. Moreover, most numerical experiments for nonlinear model reduction use a parameter dimension of only one or two. In this work, a step is made towards a more cohesive theory for nonlinear model reduction. Framing these methods in the general setting of library approximation allows us to give a first comparison of their performance with those of standard linear approximation for any general compact set. We then turn to the study these methods for solution manifolds of parametrized elliptic PDEs. We study a very specific example of library approximation where the parameter domain is split into a finite number $N$ of rectangular cells and where different reduced affine spaces of dimension $m$ are assigned to each cell. The performance of this nonlinear procedure is analyzed from the viewpoint of accuracy of approximation versus $m$ and $N$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Optimal Stable Nonlinear Approximation

While it is well known that nonlinear methods of approximation can often perform dramatically better than linear methods, there are still questions on how to measure the optimal performance possible for such methods. This paper studies nonlinear methods of approximation that are compatible with numerical implementation in that they are required to be numerically stable. A measure of optimal performance, called {\em stable manifold widths}, for approximating a model class $K$ in a Banach space $X$ by stable manifold methods is introduced. Fundamental inequalities between these stable manifold widths and the entropy of $K$ are established. The effects of requiring stability in the settings of deep learning and compressed sensing are discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Polynomial Approximation of Anisotropic Analytic Functions of Several Variables

Motivated by numerical methods for solving parametric partial differential equations, this paper studies the approximation of multivariate analytic functions by algebraic polynomials. We introduce various anisotropic model classes based on Taylor expansions, and study their approximation by finite dimensional polynomial spaces $\cal{P}_Λ$ described by lower sets $Λ$. Given a budget $n$ for the dimension of $\cal{P}_Λ$, we prove that certain lower sets $Λ_n$, with cardinality $n$, provide a certifiable approximation error that is in a certain sense optimal, and that these lower sets have a simple definition in terms of simplices. Our main goal is to obtain approximation results when the number of variables $d$ is large and even infinite, and so we concentrate almost exclusively on the case $d=\infty$. We also emphasize obtaining results which hold for the full range $n\ge 1$, rather than asymptotic results that only hold for $n$ sufficiently large. In applications, one typically wants $n$ small to comply with computational budgets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Reduced Basis Greedy Selection Using Random Training Sets

Reduced bases have been introduced for the approximation of parametrized PDEs in applications where many online queries are required. Their numerical efficiency for such problems has been theoretically confirmed in \cite{BCDDPW,DPW}, where it is shown that the reduced basis space $V_n$ of dimension $n$, constructed by a certain greedy strategy, has approximation error similar to that of the optimal space associated to the Kolmogorov $n$-width of the solution manifold. The greedy construction of the reduced basis space is performed in an offline stage which requires at each step a maximization of the current error over the parameter space. For the purpose of numerical computation, this maximization is performed over a finite {\em training set} obtained through a discretization. of the parameter domain. To guarantee a final approximation error $\varepsilon$ for the space generated by the greedy algorithm requires in principle that the snapshots associated to this training set constitute an approximation net for the solution manifold with accuracy or order $\varepsilon$. Hence, the size of the training set is the $\varepsilon$ covering number for $\mathcal{M}$ and this covering number typically behaves like $\exp(C\varepsilon^{-1/s})$ for some $C>0$ when the solution manifold has $n$-width decay $O(n^{-s})$. Thus, the shear size of the training set prohibits implementation of the algorithm when $\varepsilon$ is small. The main result of this paper shows that, if one is willing to accept results which hold with high probability, rather than with certainty, then for a large class of relevant problems one may replace the fine discretization by a random training set of size polynomial in $\varepsilon^{-1}$. Our proof of this fact is established by using inverse inequalities for polynomials in high dimensions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access