Paper detail

Data Assimilation in Reduced Modeling

We consider the problem of optimal recovery of an element $u$ of a Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$ from $m$ measurements obtained through known linear functionals on $\mathcal{H}$. Problems of this type are well studied \cite{MRW} under an assumption that $u$ belongs to a prescribed model class, e.g. a known compact subset of $\mathcal{H}$. Motivated by reduced modeling for parametric partial differential equations, this paper considers another setting where the additional information about $u$ is in the form of how well $u$ can be approximated by a certain known subspace $V_n$ of $\mathcal{H}$ of dimension $n$, or more generally, how well $u$ can be approximated by each $k$-dimensional subspace $V_k$ of a sequence of nested subspaces $V_0\subset V_1\cdots\subset V_n$. A recovery algorithm for the one-space formulation, proposed in \cite{MPPY}, is proven here to be optimal and to have a simple formulation, if certain favorable bases are chosen to represent $V_n$ and the measurements. The major contribution of the present paper is to analyze the multi-space case for which it is shown that the set of all $u$ satisfying the given information can be described as the intersection of a family of known ellipsoids in $\mathcal{H}$. It follows that a near optimal recovery algorithm in the multi-space problem is to identify any point in this intersection which can provide a much better accuracy than in the one-space problem. Two iterative algorithms based on alternating projections are proposed for recovery in the multi-space problem. A detailed analysis of one of them provides a posteriori performance estimates for the iterates, stopping criteria, and convergence rates. Since the limit of the algorithm is a point in the intersection of the aforementioned ellipsoids, it provides a near optimal recovery for $u$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.