Paper detail

Reduced Basis Greedy Selection Using Random Training Sets

Reduced bases have been introduced for the approximation of parametrized PDEs in applications where many online queries are required. Their numerical efficiency for such problems has been theoretically confirmed in \cite{BCDDPW,DPW}, where it is shown that the reduced basis space $V_n$ of dimension $n$, constructed by a certain greedy strategy, has approximation error similar to that of the optimal space associated to the Kolmogorov $n$-width of the solution manifold. The greedy construction of the reduced basis space is performed in an offline stage which requires at each step a maximization of the current error over the parameter space. For the purpose of numerical computation, this maximization is performed over a finite {\em training set} obtained through a discretization. of the parameter domain. To guarantee a final approximation error $\varepsilon$ for the space generated by the greedy algorithm requires in principle that the snapshots associated to this training set constitute an approximation net for the solution manifold with accuracy or order $\varepsilon$. Hence, the size of the training set is the $\varepsilon$ covering number for $\mathcal{M}$ and this covering number typically behaves like $\exp(C\varepsilon^{-1/s})$ for some $C>0$ when the solution manifold has $n$-width decay $O(n^{-s})$. Thus, the shear size of the training set prohibits implementation of the algorithm when $\varepsilon$ is small. The main result of this paper shows that, if one is willing to accept results which hold with high probability, rather than with certainty, then for a large class of relevant problems one may replace the fine discretization by a random training set of size polynomial in $\varepsilon^{-1}$. Our proof of this fact is established by using inverse inequalities for polynomials in high dimensions.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.