BZPEERSource author record
Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.
Catalog footprint
Published work
We give a pseudorandom generator that fools degree-d polynomial threshold functions over n-dimensional Gaussian space with seed length poly(d)⋅logn. All previous generators had a seed length with at least a 2d dependence on d. The key new ingredient is a Local Hyperconcentration Theorem, which shows that every degree-d Gaussian polynomial is hyperconcentrated almost everywhere at scale d−O(1).
Van Rooyen et al. introduced a notion of convex loss functions being robust to random classification noise, and established that the "unhinged" loss function is robust in this sense. In this note we study the accuracy of binary classifiers obtained by minimizing the unhinged loss, and observe that even for simple linearly separable data distributions, minimizing the unhinged loss may only yield a binary classifier with accuracy no better than random guessing.
In the \emph{trace reconstruction problem}, an unknown source string x∈{0,1}n is sent through a probabilistic \emph{deletion channel} which independently deletes each bit with probability δ and concatenates the surviving bits, yielding a \emph{trace} of x. The problem is to reconstruct x given independent traces. This problem has received much attention in recent years both in the worst-case setting where x may be an arbitrary string in {0,1}n \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17,HHP18,HL18,Chase19} and in the average-case setting where x is drawn uniformly at random from {0,1}n \cite{PeresZhai17,HPP18,HL18,Chase19}. This paper studies trace reconstruction in the \emph{smoothed analysis} setting, in which a ``worst-case'' string $x^{\worst}$ is chosen arbitrarily from {0,1}n, and then a perturbed version $\bx$ of $x^{\worst}$ is formed by independently replacing each coordinate by a uniform random bit with probability σ. The problem is to reconstruct $\bx$ given independent traces from it. Our main result is an algorithm which, for any constant perturbation rate 0<σ<1 and any constant deletion rate 0<δ<1, uses $\poly(n)$ running time and traces and succeeds with high probability in reconstructing the string $\bx$. This stands in contrast with the worst-case version of the problem, for which exp(O(n1/3)) is the best known time and sample complexity \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17}. Our approach is based on reconstructing $\bx$ from the multiset of its short subwords and is quite different from previous algorithms for either the worst-case or average-case versions of the problem. The heart of our work is a new $\poly(n)$-time procedure for reconstructing the multiset of all O(logn)-length subwords of any source string x∈{0,1}n given access to traces of x.
A number of recent works [Goldberg 2006; O'Donnell and Servedio 2011; De, Diakonikolas, and Servedio 2017; De, Diakonikolas, Feldman, and Servedio 2014] have considered the problem of approximately reconstructing an unknown weighted voting scheme given information about various sorts of ``power indices'' that characterize the level of control that individual voters have over the final outcome. In the language of theoretical computer science, this is the problem of approximating an unknown linear threshold function (LTF) over {−1,1}n given some numerical measure (such as the function's n ``Chow parameters,'' a.k.a. its degree-1 Fourier coefficients, or the vector of its n Shapley indices) of how much each of the n individual input variables affects the outcome of the function. In this paper we consider the problem of reconstructing an LTF given only partial information about its Chow parameters or Shapley indices; i.e. we are given only the Chow parameters or the Shapley indices corresponding to a subset S⊆[n] of the n input variables. A natural goal in this partial information setting is to find an LTF whose Chow parameters or Shapley indices corresponding to indices in S accurately match the given Chow parameters or Shapley indices of the unknown LTF. We refer to this as the Partial Inverse Power Index Problem. Our main results are a polynomial time algorithm for the (ε-approximate) Chow Parameters Partial Inverse Power Index Problem and a quasi-polynomial time algorithm for the (ε-approximate) Shapley Indices Partial Inverse Power Index Problem.
Let Uk,N denote the Boolean function which takes as input k strings of N bits each, representing k numbers a(1),…,a(k) in {0,1,…,2N−1}, and outputs 1 if and only if a(1)+⋯+a(k)≥2N. Let THRt,n denote a monotone unweighted threshold gate, i.e., the Boolean function which takes as input a single string x∈{0,1}n and outputs 1 if and only if x1+⋯+xn≥t. We refer to circuits that are composed of THR gates as monotone majority circuits. The main result of this paper is an exponential lower bound on the size of bounded-depth monotone majority circuits that compute Uk,N. More precisely, we show that for any constant d≥2, any depth-d monotone majority circuit computing Ud,N must have size 2Ω(N1/d). Since Uk,N can be computed by a single monotone weighted threshold gate (that uses exponentially large weights), our lower bound implies that constant-depth monotone majority circuits require exponential size to simulate monotone weighted threshold gates. This answers a question posed by Goldmann and Karpinski (STOC'93) and recently restated by Hastad (2010, 2014). We also show that our lower bound is essentially best possible, by constructing a depth-d, size-2O(N1/d) monotone majority circuit for Ud,N. As a corollary of our lower bound, we significantly strengthen a classical theorem in circuit complexity due to Ajtai and Gurevich (JACM'87). They exhibited a monotone function that is in AC0 but requires super-polynomial size for any constant-depth monotone circuit composed of unbounded fan-in AND and OR gates. We describe a monotone function that is in depth-3 AC0 but requires exponential size monotone circuits of any constant depth, even if the circuits are composed of THR gates.
We prove an average-case depth hierarchy theorem for Boolean circuits over the standard basis of AND, OR, and NOT gates. Our hierarchy theorem says that for every d≥2, there is an explicit n-variable Boolean function f, computed by a linear-size depth-d formula, which is such that any depth-(d−1) circuit that agrees with f on (1/2+on(1)) fraction of all inputs must have size exp(nΩ(1/d)). This answers an open question posed by Håstad in his Ph.D. thesis. Our average-case depth hierarchy theorem implies that the polynomial hierarchy is infinite relative to a random oracle with probability 1, confirming a conjecture of Håstad, Cai, and Babai. We also use our result to show that there is no "approximate converse" to the results of Linial, Mansour, Nisan and Boppana on the total influence of small-depth circuits, thus answering a question posed by O'Donnell, Kalai, and Hatami. A key ingredient in our proof is a notion of \emph{random projections} which generalize random restrictions.
We consider a basic problem in unsupervised learning: learning an unknown \emph{Poisson Binomial Distribution}. A Poisson Binomial Distribution (PBD) over {0,1,…,n} is the distribution of a sum of n independent Bernoulli random variables which may have arbitrary, potentially non-equal, expectations. These distributions were first studied by S. Poisson in 1837 \cite{Poisson:37} and are a natural n-parameter generalization of the familiar Binomial Distribution. Surprisingly, prior to our work this basic learning problem was poorly understood, and known results for it were far from optimal. We essentially settle the complexity of the learning problem for this basic class of distributions. As our first main result we give a highly efficient algorithm which learns to $\eps$-accuracy (with respect to the total variation distance) using $\tilde{O}(1/\eps^3)$ samples \emph{independent of n}. The running time of the algorithm is \emph{quasilinear} in the size of its input data, i.e., $\tilde{O}(\log(n)/\eps^3)$ bit-operations. (Observe that each draw from the distribution is a log(n)-bit string.) Our second main result is a {\em proper} learning algorithm that learns to $\eps$-accuracy using $\tilde{O}(1/\eps^2)$ samples, and runs in time $(1/\eps)^{\poly (\log (1/\eps))} \cdot \log n$. This is nearly optimal, since any algorithm {for this problem} must use $Ω(1/\eps^2)$ samples. We also give positive and negative results for some extensions of this learning problem to weighted sums of independent Bernoulli random variables.
We show that any depth-d circuit for determining whether an n-node graph has an s-to-t path of length at most k must have size nΩ(k1/d/d). The previous best circuit size lower bounds for this problem were nkexp(−O(d)) (due to Beame, Impagliazzo, and Pitassi [BIP98]) and nΩ((logk)/d) (following from a recent formula size lower bound of Rossman [Ros14]). Our lower bound is quite close to optimal, since a simple construction gives depth-d circuits of size nO(k2/d) for this problem (and strengthening our bound even to nkΩ(1/d) would require proving that undirected connectivity is not in NC1.) Our proof is by reduction to a new lower bound on the size of small-depth circuits computing a skewed variant of the "Sipser functions" that have played an important role in classical circuit lower bounds [Sip83, Yao85, Hås86]. A key ingredient in our proof of the required lower bound for these Sipser-like functions is the use of \emph{random projections}, an extension of random restrictions which were recently employed in [RST15]. Random projections allow us to obtain sharper quantitative bounds while employing simpler arguments, both conceptually and technically, than in the previous works [Ajt89, BPU92, BIP98, Ros14].
A natural measure of smoothness of a Boolean function is its sensitivity (the largest number of Hamming neighbors of a point which differ from it in function value). The structure of smooth or equivalently low-sensitivity functions is still a mystery. A well-known conjecture states that every such Boolean function can be computed by a shallow decision tree. While this conjecture implies that smooth functions are easy to compute in the simplest computational model, to date no non-trivial upper bounds were known for such functions in any computational model, including unrestricted Boolean circuits. Even a bound on the description length of such functions better than the trivial 2n does not seem to have been known. In this work, we establish the first computational upper bounds on smooth Boolean functions: 1) We show that every sensitivity s function is uniquely specified by its values on a Hamming ball of radius 2s. We use this to show that such functions can be computed by circuits of size nO(s). 2) We show that sensitivity s functions satisfy a strong pointwise noise-stability guarantee for random noise of rate O(1/s). We use this to show that these functions have formulas of depth O(s log n). 3) We show that sensitivity s functions can be (locally) self-corrected from worst-case noise of rate exp(−O(s)). All our results are simple, and follow rather directly from (variants of) the basic fact that that the function value at few points in small neighborhoods of a given point determine its function value via a majority vote. Our results confirm various consequences of the conjecture. They may be viewed as providing a new form of evidence towards its validity, as well as new directions towards attacking it.
We study a new framework for property testing of probability distributions, by considering distribution testing algorithms that have access to a conditional sampling oracle.* This is an oracle that takes as input a subset S⊆[N] of the domain [N] of the unknown probability distribution D and returns a draw from the conditional probability distribution D restricted to S. This new model allows considerable flexibility in the design of distribution testing algorithms; in particular, testing algorithms in this model can be adaptive. We study a wide range of natural distribution testing problems in this new framework and some of its variants, giving both upper and lower bounds on query complexity. These problems include testing whether D is the uniform distribution U; testing whether D=D∗ for an explicitly provided D∗; testing whether two unknown distributions D1 and D2 are equivalent; and estimating the variation distance between D and the uniform distribution. At a high level our main finding is that the new "conditional sampling" framework we consider is a powerful one: while all the problems mentioned above have Ω(N) sample complexity in the standard model (and in some cases the complexity must be almost linear in N), we give poly(logN,1/ε)-query algorithms (and in some cases poly(1/ε)-query algorithms independent of N) for all these problems in our conditional sampling setting. *Independently from our work, Chakraborty et al. also considered this framework. We discuss their work in Subsection [1.4].
We prove a lower bound of Ω(n1/2−c), for all c>0, on the query complexity of (two-sided error) non-adaptive algorithms for testing whether an n-variable Boolean function is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This improves a Ω~(n1/5) lower bound for the same problem that was recently given in [CST14] and is very close to Ω(n1/2), which we conjecture is the optimal lower bound for this model.
A k-modal probability distribution over the discrete domain {1,...,n} is one whose histogram has at most k "peaks" and "valleys." Such distributions are natural generalizations of monotone (k=0) and unimodal (k=1) probability distributions, which have been intensively studied in probability theory and statistics. In this paper we consider the problem of \emph{learning} (i.e., performing density estimation of) an unknown k-modal distribution with respect to the L1 distance. The learning algorithm is given access to independent samples drawn from an unknown k-modal distribution p, and it must output a hypothesis distribution p such that with high probability the total variation distance between p and p is at most ε. Our main goal is to obtain \emph{computationally efficient} algorithms for this problem that use (close to) an information-theoretically optimal number of samples. We give an efficient algorithm for this problem that runs in time poly(k,log(n),1/ε). For k≤O~(logn), the number of samples used by our algorithm is very close (within an O~(log(1/ε)) factor) to being information-theoretically optimal. Prior to this work computationally efficient algorithms were known only for the cases k=0,1 \cite{Birge:87b,Birge:97}. A novel feature of our approach is that our learning algorithm crucially uses a new algorithm for \emph{property testing of probability distributions} as a key subroutine. The learning algorithm uses the property tester to efficiently decompose the k-modal distribution into k (near-)monotone distributions, which are easier to learn.
Monotone Boolean functions, and the monotone Boolean circuits that compute them, have been intensively studied in complexity theory. In this paper we study the structure of Boolean functions in terms of the minimum number of negations in any circuit computing them, a complexity measure that interpolates between monotone functions and the class of all functions. We study this generalization of monotonicity from the vantage point of learning theory, giving near-matching upper and lower bounds on the uniform-distribution learnability of circuits in terms of the number of negations they contain. Our upper bounds are based on a new structural characterization of negation-limited circuits that extends a classical result of A. A. Markov. Our lower bounds, which employ Fourier-analytic tools from hardness amplification, give new results even for circuits with no negations (i.e. monotone functions).
Let p be an unknown and arbitrary probability distribution over [0,1). We consider the problem of {\em density estimation}, in which a learning algorithm is given i.i.d. draws from p and must (with high probability) output a hypothesis distribution that is close to p. The main contribution of this paper is a highly efficient density estimation algorithm for learning using a variable-width histogram, i.e., a hypothesis distribution with a piecewise constant probability density function. In more detail, for any k and ε, we give an algorithm that makes O~(k/ε2) draws from p, runs in O~(k/ε2) time, and outputs a hypothesis distribution h that is piecewise constant with O(klog2(1/ε)) pieces. With high probability the hypothesis h satisfies dTV(p,h)≤C⋅optk(p)+ε, where dTV denotes the total variation distance (statistical distance), C is a universal constant, and optk(p) is the smallest total variation distance between p and any k-piecewise constant distribution. The sample size and running time of our algorithm are optimal up to logarithmic factors. The "approximation factor" C in our result is inherent in the problem, as we prove that no algorithm with sample size bounded in terms of k and ε can achieve C<2 regardless of what kind of hypothesis distribution it uses.
We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown Boolean function f is monotone versus ε-far from every monotone function. The two main results of this paper are a new lower bound and a new algorithm for this well-studied problem. Lower bound: We prove an Ω~(n1/5) lower bound on the query complexity of any non-adaptive two-sided error algorithm for testing whether an unknown Boolean function f is monotone versus constant-far from monotone. This gives an exponential improvement on the previous lower bound of Ω(logn) due to Fischer et al. [FLN+02]. We show that the same lower bound holds for monotonicity testing of Boolean-valued functions over hypergrid domains {1,…,m}n for all m≥2. Upper bound: We give an O~(n5/6)poly(1/ε)-query algorithm that tests whether an unknown Boolean function f is monotone versus ε-far from monotone. Our algorithm, which is non-adaptive and makes one-sided error, is a modified version of the algorithm of Chakrabarty and Seshadhri [CS13a], which makes O~(n7/8)poly(1/ε) queries.
We consider a problem which has received considerable attention in systems literature because of its applications to routing in delay tolerant networks and replica placement in distributed storage systems. In abstract terms the problem can be stated as follows: Given a random variable X generated by a known product distribution over {0,1}n and a target value 0≤θ≤1, output a non-negative vector w, with ∥w∥1≤1, which maximizes the probability of the event w⋅X≥θ. This is a challenging non-convex optimization problem for which even computing the value Pr[w⋅X≥θ] of a proposed solution vector w is #P-hard. We provide an additive EPTAS for this problem which, for constant-bounded product distributions, runs in $ \poly(n) \cdot 2^{\poly(1/\eps)}$ time and outputs an $\eps$-approximately optimal solution vector w for this problem. Our approach is inspired by, and extends, recent structural results from the complexity-theoretic study of linear threshold functions. Furthermore, in spite of the objective function being non-smooth, we give a \emph{unicriterion} PTAS while previous work for such objective functions has typically led to a \emph{bicriterion} PTAS. We believe our techniques may be applicable to get unicriterion PTAS for other non-smooth objective functions.
This paper makes two contributions towards determining some well-studied optimal constants in Fourier analysis \newa{of Boolean functions} and high-dimensional geometry. \begin{enumerate} \item It has been known since 1994 \cite{GL:94} that every linear threshold function has squared Fourier mass at least 1/2 on its degree-0 and degree-1 coefficients. Denote the minimum such Fourier mass by $\w^{\leq 1}[\ltf]$, where the minimum is taken over all n-variable linear threshold functions and all n≥0. Benjamini, Kalai and Schramm \cite{BKS:99} have conjectured that the true value of $\w^{\leq 1}[\ltf]$ is 2/π. We make progress on this conjecture by proving that $\w^{\leq 1}[\ltf] \geq 1/2 + c$ for some absolute constant c>0. The key ingredient in our proof is a "robust" version of the well-known Khintchine inequality in functional analysis, which we believe may be of independent interest. \item We give an algorithm with the following property: given any η>0, the algorithm runs in time $2^{\poly(1/η)}$ and determines the value of $\w^{\leq 1}[\ltf]$ up to an additive error of ±η. We give a similar $2^{\poly(1/η)}$-time algorithm to determine \emph{Tomaszewski's constant} to within an additive error of ±η; this is the minimum (over all origin-centered hyperplanes H) fraction of points in {−1,1}n that lie within Euclidean distance 1 of H. Tomaszewski's constant is conjectured to be 1/2; lower bounds on it have been given by Holzman and Kleitman \cite{HK92} and independently by Ben-Tal, Nemirovski and Roos \cite{BNR02}. Our algorithms combine tools from anti-concentration of sums of independent random variables, Fourier analysis, and Hermite analysis of linear threshold functions. \end{enumerate}
We give a {\em deterministic} algorithm for approximately computing the fraction of Boolean assignments that satisfy a degree-2 polynomial threshold function. Given a degree-2 input polynomial p(x1,…,xn) and a parameter $\eps > 0$, the algorithm approximates Prx∼{−1,1}n[p(x)≥0] to within an additive $\pm \eps$ in time $\poly(n,2^{\poly(1/\eps)})$. Note that it is NP-hard to determine whether the above probability is nonzero, so any sort of multiplicative approximation is almost certainly impossible even for efficient randomized algorithms. This is the first deterministic algorithm for this counting problem in which the running time is polynomial in n for $\eps= o(1)$. For "regular" polynomials p (those in which no individual variable's influence is large compared to the sum of all n variable influences) our algorithm runs in $\poly(n,1/\eps)$ time. The algorithm also runs in $\poly(n,1/\eps)$ time to approximate Prx∼N(0,1)n[p(x)≥0] to within an additive $\pm \eps$, for any degree-2 polynomial p. As an application of our counting result, we give a deterministic FPT multiplicative $(1 \pm \eps)$-approximation algorithm to approximate the k-th absolute moment $\E_{x \sim \{-1,1\}^n}[|p(x)^k|]$ of a degree-2 polynomial. The algorithm's running time is of the form $\poly(n) \cdot f(k,1/\eps)$.
Let g:{−1,1}k→{−1,1} be any Boolean function and q1,…,qk be any degree-2 polynomials over {−1,1}n. We give a \emph{deterministic} algorithm which, given as input explicit descriptions of g,q1,…,qk and an accuracy parameter $\eps>0$, approximates \[\Pr_{x \sim \{-1,1\}^n}[g(\sign(q_1(x)),\dots,\sign(q_k(x)))=1]\] to within an additive $\pm \eps$. For any constant $\eps > 0$ and k≥1 the running time of our algorithm is a fixed polynomial in n. This is the first fixed polynomial-time algorithm that can deterministically approximately count satisfying assignments of a natural class of depth-3 Boolean circuits. Our algorithm extends a recent result \cite{DDS13:deg2count} which gave a deterministic approximate counting algorithm for a single degree-2 polynomial threshold function $\sign(q(x)),$ corresponding to the k=1 case of our result. Our algorithm and analysis requires several novel technical ingredients that go significantly beyond the tools required to handle the k=1 case in \cite{DDS13:deg2count}. One of these is a new multidimensional central limit theorem for degree-2 polynomials in Gaussian random variables which builds on recent Malliavin-calculus-based results from probability theory. We use this CLT as the basis of a new decomposition technique for k-tuples of degree-2 Gaussian polynomials and thus obtain an efficient deterministic approximate counting algorithm for the Gaussian distribution. Finally, a third new ingredient is a "regularity lemma" for \emph{k-tuples} of degree-d polynomial threshold functions. This generalizes both the regularity lemmas of \cite{DSTW:10,HKM:09} and the regularity lemma of Gopalan et al \cite{GOWZ10}. Our new regularity lemma lets us extend our deterministic approximate counting results from the Gaussian to the Boolean domain.
We give a highly efficient "semi-agnostic" algorithm for learning univariate probability distributions that are well approximated by piecewise polynomial density functions. Let p be an arbitrary distribution over an interval I which is τ-close (in total variation distance) to an unknown probability distribution q that is defined by an unknown partition of I into t intervals and t unknown degree-d polynomials specifying q over each of the intervals. We give an algorithm that draws $\tilde{O}(t\new{(d+1)}/\eps^2)$ samples from p, runs in time $\poly(t,d,1/\eps)$, and with high probability outputs a piecewise polynomial hypothesis distribution h that is $(O(τ)+\eps)$-close (in total variation distance) to p. This sample complexity is essentially optimal; we show that even for τ=0, any algorithm that learns an unknown t-piecewise degree-d probability distribution over I to accuracy $\eps$ must use $Ω({\frac {t(d+1)} {\poly(1 + \log(d+1))}} \cdot {\frac 1 {\eps^2}})$ samples from the distribution, regardless of its running time. Our algorithm combines tools from approximation theory, uniform convergence, linear programming, and dynamic programming. We apply this general algorithm to obtain a wide range of results for many natural problems in density estimation over both continuous and discrete domains. These include state-of-the-art results for learning mixtures of log-concave distributions; mixtures of t-modal distributions; mixtures of Monotone Hazard Rate distributions; mixtures of Poisson Binomial Distributions; mixtures of Gaussians; and mixtures of k-monotone densities. Our general technique yields computationally efficient algorithms for all these problems, in many cases with provably optimal sample complexities (up to logarithmic factors) in all parameters.
We initiate the study of \emph{inverse} problems in approximate uniform generation, focusing on uniform generation of satisfying assignments of various types of Boolean functions. In such an inverse problem, the algorithm is given uniform random satisfying assignments of an unknown function f belonging to a class $\C$ of Boolean functions, and the goal is to output a probability distribution D which is ε-close, in total variation distance, to the uniform distribution over f−1(1). Positive results: We prove a general positive result establishing sufficient conditions for efficient inverse approximate uniform generation for a class $\C$. We define a new type of algorithm called a \emph{densifier} for $\C$, and show (roughly speaking) how to combine (i) a densifier, (ii) an approximate counting / uniform generation algorithm, and (iii) a Statistical Query learning algorithm, to obtain an inverse approximate uniform generation algorithm. We apply this general result to obtain a poly$(n,1/\eps)$-time algorithm for the class of halfspaces; and a quasipoly$(n,1/\eps)$-time algorithm for the class of $\poly(n)$-size DNF formulas. Negative results: We prove a general negative result establishing that the existence of certain types of signature schemes in cryptography implies the hardness of certain inverse approximate uniform generation problems. This implies that there are no {subexponential}-time inverse approximate uniform generation algorithms for 3-CNF formulas; for intersections of two halfspaces; for degree-2 polynomial threshold functions; and for monotone 2-CNF formulas. Finally, we show that there is no general relationship between the complexity of the "forward" approximate uniform generation problem and the complexity of the inverse problem for a class $\C$ -- it is possible for either one to be easy while the other is hard.
Let C be a class of probability distributions over the discrete domain [n]={1,...,n}. We show that if C satisfies a rather general condition -- essentially, that each distribution in C can be well-approximated by a variable-width histogram with few bins -- then there is a highly efficient (both in terms of running time and sample complexity) algorithm that can learn any mixture of k unknown distributions from C. We analyze several natural types of distributions over [n], including log-concave, monotone hazard rate and unimodal distributions, and show that they have the required structural property of being well-approximated by a histogram with few bins. Applying our general algorithm, we obtain near-optimally efficient algorithms for all these mixture learning problems.
The \emph{Chow parameters} of a Boolean function f:{−1,1}n→{−1,1} are its n+1 degree-0 and degree-1 Fourier coefficients. It has been known since 1961 (Chow, Tannenbaum) that the (exact values of the) Chow parameters of any linear threshold function f uniquely specify f within the space of all Boolean functions, but until recently (O'Donnell and Servedio) nothing was known about efficient algorithms for \emph{reconstructing} f (exactly or approximately) from exact or approximate values of its Chow parameters. We refer to this reconstruction problem as the \emph{Chow Parameters Problem.} Our main result is a new algorithm for the Chow Parameters Problem which, given (sufficiently accurate approximations to) the Chow parameters of any linear threshold function f, runs in time $\tilde{O}(n^2)\cdot (1/\eps)^{O(\log^2(1/\eps))}$ and with high probability outputs a representation of an LTF f′ that is $\eps$-close to f. The only previous algorithm (O'Donnell and Servedio) had running time $\poly(n) \cdot 2^{2^{\tilde{O}(1/\eps^2)}}.$ As a byproduct of our approach, we show that for any linear threshold function f over {−1,1}n, there is a linear threshold function f′ which is $\eps$-close to f and has all weights that are integers at most $\sqrt{n} \cdot (1/\eps)^{O(\log^2(1/\eps))}$. This significantly improves the best previous result of Diakonikolas and Servedio which gave a $\poly(n) \cdot 2^{\tilde{O}(1/\eps^{2/3})}$ weight bound, and is close to the known lower bound of max{n, $(1/\eps)^{Ω(\log \log (1/\eps))}\}$ (Goldberg, Servedio). Our techniques also yield improved algorithms for related problems in learning theory.
Bourgain showed that any noise stable Boolean function f can be well-approximated by a junta. In this note we give an exponential sharpening of the parameters of Bourgain's result under the additional assumption that f is a halfspace.
For f a weighted voting scheme used by n voters to choose between two candidates, the n \emph{Shapley-Shubik Indices} (or {\em Shapley values}) of f provide a measure of how much control each voter can exert over the overall outcome of the vote. Shapley-Shubik indices were introduced by Lloyd Shapley and Martin Shubik in 1954 \cite{SS54} and are widely studied in social choice theory as a measure of the "influence" of voters. The \emph{Inverse Shapley Value Problem} is the problem of designing a weighted voting scheme which (approximately) achieves a desired input vector of values for the Shapley-Shubik indices. Despite much interest in this problem no provably correct and efficient algorithm was known prior to our work. We give the first efficient algorithm with provable performance guarantees for the Inverse Shapley Value Problem. For any constant $\eps > 0$ our algorithm runs in fixed poly(n) time (the degree of the polynomial is independent of $\eps$) and has the following performance guarantee: given as input a vector of desired Shapley values, if any "reasonable" weighted voting scheme (roughly, one in which the threshold is not too skewed) approximately matches the desired vector of values to within some small error, then our algorithm explicitly outputs a weighted voting scheme that achieves this vector of Shapley values to within error $\eps.$ If there is a "reasonable" voting scheme in which all voting weights are integers at most $\poly(n)$ that approximately achieves the desired Shapley values, then our algorithm runs in time $\poly(n)$ and outputs a weighted voting scheme that achieves the target vector of Shapley values to within error $\eps=n^{-1/8}.$
We consider the problem of learning an unknown product distribution X over {0,1}n using samples f(X) where f is a \emph{known} transformation function. Each choice of a transformation function f specifies a learning problem in this framework. Information-theoretic arguments show that for every transformation function f the corresponding learning problem can be solved to accuracy $\eps$, using $\tilde{O}(n/\eps^2)$ examples, by a generic algorithm whose running time may be exponential in n. We show that this learning problem can be computationally intractable even for constant $\eps$ and rather simple transformation functions. Moreover, the above sample complexity bound is nearly optimal for the general problem, as we give a simple explicit linear transformation function f(x)=w⋅x with integer weights wi≤n and prove that the corresponding learning problem requires Ω(n) samples. As our main positive result we give a highly efficient algorithm for learning a sum of independent unknown Bernoulli random variables, corresponding to the transformation function f(x)=∑i=1nxi. Our algorithm learns to $\eps$-accuracy in poly(n) time, using a surprising poly$(1/\eps)$ number of samples that is independent of n. We also give an efficient algorithm that uses $\log n \cdot \poly(1/\eps)$ samples but has running time that is only $\poly(\log n, 1/\eps).$
This work considers computationally efficient privacy-preserving data release. We study the task of analyzing a database containing sensitive information about individual participants. Given a set of statistical queries on the data, we want to release approximate answers to the queries while also guaranteeing differential privacy---protecting each participant's sensitive data. Our focus is on computationally efficient data release algorithms; we seek algorithms whose running time is polynomial, or at least sub-exponential, in the data dimensionality. Our primary contribution is a computationally efficient reduction from differentially private data release for a class of counting queries, to learning thresholded sums of predicates from a related class. We instantiate this general reduction with a variety of algorithms for learning thresholds. These instantiations yield several new results for differentially private data release. As two examples, taking {0,1}^d to be the data domain (of dimension d), we obtain differentially private algorithms for: (*) Releasing all k-way conjunctions. For any given k, the resulting data release algorithm has bounded error as long as the database is of size at least d^{O(\sqrt{k\log(k\log d)})}. The running time is polynomial in the database size. (*) Releasing a (1-γ)-fraction of all parity queries. For any γ\geq \poly(1/d), the algorithm has bounded error as long as the database is of size at least \poly(d). The running time is polynomial in the database size. Several other instantiations yield further results for privacy-preserving data release. Of the two results highlighted above, the first learning algorithm uses techniques for representing thresholded sums of predicates as low-degree polynomial threshold functions. The second learning algorithm is based on Jackson's Harmonic Sieve algorithm [Jackson 1997].
We give highly efficient algorithms, and almost matching lower bounds, for a range of basic statistical problems that involve testing and estimating the L_1 distance between two k-modal distributions p and q over the discrete domain {1,…,n}. More precisely, we consider the following four problems: given sample access to an unknown k-modal distribution p, Testing identity to a known or unknown distribution: 1. Determine whether p=q (for an explicitly given k-modal distribution q) versus p is $\eps$-far from q; 2. Determine whether p=q (where q is available via sample access) versus p is $\eps$-far from q; Estimating L1 distance ("tolerant testing'') against a known or unknown distribution: 3. Approximate dTV(p,q) to within additive $\eps$ where q is an explicitly given k-modal distribution q; 4. Approximate dTV(p,q) to within additive $\eps$ where q is available via sample access. For each of these four problems we give sub-logarithmic sample algorithms, that we show are tight up to additive $\poly(k)$ and multiplicative $\polylog\log n+\polylog k$ factors. Thus our bounds significantly improve the previous results of \cite{BKR:04}, which were for testing identity of distributions (items (1) and (2) above) in the special cases k=0 (monotone distributions) and k=1 (unimodal distributions) and required O((logn)3) samples. As our main conceptual contribution, we introduce a new reduction-based approach for distribution-testing problems that lets us obtain all the above results in a unified way. Roughly speaking, this approach enables us to transform various distribution testing problems for k-modal distributions over {1,…,n} to the corresponding distribution testing problems for unrestricted distributions over a much smaller domain {1,…,ℓ} where ℓ=O(klogn).
We give a "regularity lemma" for degree-d polynomial threshold functions (PTFs) over the Boolean cube {-1,1}^n. This result shows that every degree-d PTF can be decomposed into a constant number of subfunctions such that almost all of the subfunctions are close to being regular PTFs. Here a "regular PTF is a PTF sign(p(x)) where the influence of each variable on the polynomial p(x) is a small fraction of the total influence of p. As an application of this regularity lemma, we prove that for any constants d \geq 1, \eps \geq 0, every degree-d PTF over n variables has can be approximated to accuracy eps by a constant-degree PTF that has integer weights of total magnitude O(n^d). This weight bound is shown to be optimal up to constant factors.
Hardness results for maximum agreement problems have close connections to hardness results for proper learning in computational learning theory. In this paper we prove two hardness results for the problem of finding a low degree polynomial threshold function (PTF) which has the maximum possible agreement with a given set of labeled examples in Rn×{−1,1}. We prove that for any constants $d\geq 1, \eps > 0$, {itemize} Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, no polynomial-time algorithm can find a degree-d PTF that is consistent with a $(\half + \eps)$ fraction of a given set of labeled examples in Rn×{−1,1}, even if there exists a degree-d PTF that is consistent with a $1-\eps$ fraction of the examples. It is $\NP$-hard to find a degree-2 PTF that is consistent with a $(\half + \eps)$ fraction of a given set of labeled examples in Rn×{−1,1}, even if there exists a halfspace (degree-1 PTF) that is consistent with a $1 - \eps$ fraction of the examples. {itemize} These results immediately imply the following hardness of learning results: (i) Assuming the Unique Games Conjecture, there is no better-than-trivial proper learning algorithm that agnostically learns degree-d PTFs under arbitrary distributions; (ii) There is no better-than-trivial learning algorithm that outputs degree-2 PTFs and agnostically learns halfspaces (i.e. degree-1 PTFs) under arbitrary distributions.
Research graph
Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.
BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.