Paper detail

Polynomial-time trace reconstruction in the smoothed complexity model

In the \emph{trace reconstruction problem}, an unknown source string $x \in \{0,1\}^n$ is sent through a probabilistic \emph{deletion channel} which independently deletes each bit with probability $δ$ and concatenates the surviving bits, yielding a \emph{trace} of $x$. The problem is to reconstruct $x$ given independent traces. This problem has received much attention in recent years both in the worst-case setting where $x$ may be an arbitrary string in $\{0,1\}^n$ \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17,HHP18,HL18,Chase19} and in the average-case setting where $x$ is drawn uniformly at random from $\{0,1\}^n$ \cite{PeresZhai17,HPP18,HL18,Chase19}. This paper studies trace reconstruction in the \emph{smoothed analysis} setting, in which a ``worst-case&#39;&#39; string $x^{\worst}$ is chosen arbitrarily from $\{0,1\}^n$, and then a perturbed version $\bx$ of $x^{\worst}$ is formed by independently replacing each coordinate by a uniform random bit with probability $σ$. The problem is to reconstruct $\bx$ given independent traces from it. Our main result is an algorithm which, for any constant perturbation rate $0<σ< 1$ and any constant deletion rate $0 < δ< 1$, uses $\poly(n)$ running time and traces and succeeds with high probability in reconstructing the string $\bx$. This stands in contrast with the worst-case version of the problem, for which $\text{exp}(O(n^{1/3}))$ is the best known time and sample complexity \cite{DOS17,NazarovPeres17}. Our approach is based on reconstructing $\bx$ from the multiset of its short subwords and is quite different from previous algorithms for either the worst-case or average-case versions of the problem. The heart of our work is a new $\poly(n)$-time procedure for reconstructing the multiset of all $O(\log n)$-length subwords of any source string $x\in \{0,1\}^n$ given access to traces of $x$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.