BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Li-Yang Tan

Li-Yang Tan contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityMachine LearningDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
14works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

14 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

A Query-Optimal Algorithm for Finding Counterfactuals

We design an algorithm for finding counterfactuals with strong theoretical guarantees on its performance. For any monotone model $f : X^d \to \{0,1\}$ and instance $x^\star$, our algorithm makes \[ {S(f)^{O(Δ_f(x^\star))}\cdot \log d}\] queries to $f$ and returns {an {\sl optimal}} counterfactual for $x^\star$: a nearest instance $x'$ to $x^\star$ for which $f(x')\ne f(x^\star)$. Here $S(f)$ is the sensitivity of $f$, a discrete analogue of the Lipschitz constant, and $Δ_f(x^\star)$ is the distance from $x^\star$ to its nearest counterfactuals. The previous best known query complexity was $d^{\,O(Δ_f(x^\star))}$, achievable by brute-force local search. We further prove a lower bound of $S(f)^{Ω(Δ_f(x^\star))} + Ω(\log d)$ on the query complexity of any algorithm, thereby showing that the guarantees of our algorithm are essentially optimal.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Almost 3-Approximate Correlation Clustering in Constant Rounds

We study parallel algorithms for correlation clustering. Each pair among $n$ objects is labeled as either "similar" or "dissimilar". The goal is to partition the objects into arbitrarily many clusters while minimizing the number of disagreements with the labels. Our main result is an algorithm that for any $ε> 0$ obtains a $(3+ε)$-approximation in $O(1/ε)$ rounds (of models such as massively parallel computation, local, and semi-streaming). This is a culminating point for the rich literature on parallel correlation clustering. On the one hand, the approximation (almost) matches a natural barrier of 3 for combinatorial algorithms. On the other hand, the algorithm's round-complexity is essentially constant. To achieve this result, we introduce a simple $O(1/ε)$-round parallel algorithm. Our main result is to provide an analysis of this algorithm, showing that it achieves a $(3+ε)$-approximation. Our analysis draws on new connections to sublinear-time algorithms. Specifically, it builds on the work of Yoshida, Yamamoto, and Ito [STOC'09] on bounding the "query complexity" of greedy maximal independent set. To our knowledge, this is the first application of this method in analyzing the approximation ratio of any algorithm.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Fooling Gaussian PTFs via Local Hyperconcentration

We give a pseudorandom generator that fools degree-$d$ polynomial threshold functions over $n$-dimensional Gaussian space with seed length $\mathrm{poly}(d)\cdot \log n$. All previous generators had a seed length with at least a $2^d$ dependence on $d$. The key new ingredient is a Local Hyperconcentration Theorem, which shows that every degree-$d$ Gaussian polynomial is hyperconcentrated almost everywhere at scale $d^{-O(1)}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multitask Learning via Shared Features: Algorithms and Hardness

We investigate the computational efficiency of multitask learning of Boolean functions over the $d$-dimensional hypercube, that are related by means of a feature representation of size $k \ll d$ shared across all tasks. We present a polynomial time multitask learning algorithm for the concept class of halfspaces with margin $γ$, which is based on a simultaneous boosting technique and requires only $\textrm{poly}(k/γ)$ samples-per-task and $\textrm{poly}(k\log(d)/γ)$ samples in total. In addition, we prove a computational separation, showing that assuming there exists a concept class that cannot be learned in the attribute-efficient model, we can construct another concept class such that can be learned in the attribute-efficient model, but cannot be multitask learned efficiently -- multitask learning this concept class either requires super-polynomial time complexity or a much larger total number of samples.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On the power of adaptivity in statistical adversaries

We study a fundamental question concerning adversarial noise models in statistical problems where the algorithm receives i.i.d. draws from a distribution $\mathcal{D}$. The definitions of these adversaries specify the type of allowable corruptions (noise model) as well as when these corruptions can be made (adaptivity); the latter differentiates between oblivious adversaries that can only corrupt the distribution $\mathcal{D}$ and adaptive adversaries that can have their corruptions depend on the specific sample $S$ that is drawn from $\mathcal{D}$. In this work, we investigate whether oblivious adversaries are effectively equivalent to adaptive adversaries, across all noise models studied in the literature. Specifically, can the behavior of an algorithm $\mathcal{A}$ in the presence of oblivious adversaries always be well-approximated by that of an algorithm $\mathcal{A}'$ in the presence of adaptive adversaries? Our first result shows that this is indeed the case for the broad class of statistical query algorithms, under all reasonable noise models. We then show that in the specific case of additive noise, this equivalence holds for all algorithms. Finally, we map out an approach towards proving this statement in its fullest generality, for all algorithms and under all reasonable noise models.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Open Problem: Properly learning decision trees in polynomial time?

The authors recently gave an $n^{O(\log\log n)}$ time membership query algorithm for properly learning decision trees under the uniform distribution (Blanc et al., 2021). The previous fastest algorithm for this problem ran in $n^{O(\log n)}$ time, a consequence of Ehrenfeucht and Haussler (1989)'s classic algorithm for the distribution-free setting. In this article we highlight the natural open problem of obtaining a polynomial-time algorithm, discuss possible avenues towards obtaining it, and state intermediate milestones that we believe are of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Popular decision tree algorithms are provably noise tolerant

Using the framework of boosting, we prove that all impurity-based decision tree learning algorithms, including the classic ID3, C4.5, and CART, are highly noise tolerant. Our guarantees hold under the strongest noise model of nasty noise, and we provide near-matching upper and lower bounds on the allowable noise rate. We further show that these algorithms, which are simple and have long been central to everyday machine learning, enjoy provable guarantees in the noisy setting that are unmatched by existing algorithms in the theoretical literature on decision tree learning. Taken together, our results add to an ongoing line of research that seeks to place the empirical success of these practical decision tree algorithms on firm theoretical footing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Reconstructing decision trees

We give the first {\sl reconstruction algorithm} for decision trees: given queries to a function $f$ that is $\mathrm{opt}$-close to a size-$s$ decision tree, our algorithm provides query access to a decision tree $T$ where: $\circ$ $T$ has size $S = s^{O((\log s)^2/\varepsilon^3)}$; $\circ$ $\mathrm{dist}(f,T)\le O(\mathrm{opt})+\varepsilon$; $\circ$ Every query to $T$ is answered with $\mathrm{poly}((\log s)/\varepsilon)\cdot \log n$ queries to $f$ and in $\mathrm{poly}((\log s)/\varepsilon)\cdot n\log n$ time. This yields a {\sl tolerant tester} that distinguishes functions that are close to size-$s$ decision trees from those that are far from size-$S$ decision trees. The polylogarithmic dependence on $s$ in the efficiency of our tester is exponentially smaller than that of existing testers. Since decision tree complexity is well known to be related to numerous other boolean function properties, our results also provide a new algorithms for reconstructing and testing these properties.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The composition complexity of majority

We study the complexity of computing majority as a composition of local functions: \[ \text{Maj}_n = h(g_1,\ldots,g_m), \] where each $g_j :\{0,1\}^{n} \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary function that queries only $k \ll n$ variables and $h : \{0,1\}^m \to \{0,1\}$ is an arbitrary combining function. We prove an optimal lower bound of \[ m \ge Ω\left( \frac{n}{k} \log k \right) \] on the number of functions needed, which is a factor $Ω(\log k)$ larger than the ideal $m = n/k$. We call this factor the composition overhead; previously, no superconstant lower bounds on it were known for majority. Our lower bound recovers, as a corollary and via an entirely different proof, the best known lower bound for bounded-width branching programs for majority (Alon and Maass '86, Babai et al. '90). It is also the first step in a plan that we propose for breaking a longstanding barrier in lower bounds for small-depth boolean circuits. Novel aspects of our proof include sharp bounds on the information lost as computation flows through the inner functions $g_j$, and the bootstrapping of lower bounds for a multi-output function (Hamming weight) into lower bounds for a single-output one (majority).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

The Query Complexity of Certification

We study the problem of {\sl certification}: given queries to a function $f : \{0,1\}^n \to \{0,1\}$ with certificate complexity $\le k$ and an input $x^\star$, output a size-$k$ certificate for $f$'s value on $x^\star$. This abstractly models a central problem in explainable machine learning, where we think of $f$ as a blackbox model that we seek to explain the predictions of. For monotone functions, a classic local search algorithm of Angluin accomplishes this task with $n$ queries, which we show is optimal for local search algorithms. Our main result is a new algorithm for certifying monotone functions with $O(k^8 \log n)$ queries, which comes close to matching the information-theoretic lower bound of $Ω(k \log n)$. The design and analysis of our algorithm are based on a new connection to threshold phenomena in monotone functions. We further prove exponential-in-$k$ lower bounds when $f$ is non-monotone, and when $f$ is monotone but the algorithm is only given random examples of $f$. These lower bounds show that assumptions on the structure of $f$ and query access to it are both necessary for the polynomial dependence on $k$ that we achieve.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Tradeoffs for small-depth Frege proofs

We study the complexity of small-depth Frege proofs and give the first tradeoffs between the size of each line and the number of lines. Existing lower bounds apply to the overall proof size -- the sum of sizes of all lines -- and do not distinguish between these notions of complexity. For depth-$d$ Frege proofs of the Tseitin principle on the $n \times n$ grid where each line is a size-$s$ formula, we prove that $\exp(n/2^{Ω(d\sqrt{\log s})})$ many lines are necessary. This yields new lower bounds on line complexity that are not implied by Håstad's recent $\exp(n^{Ω(1/d)})$ lower bound on the overall proof size. For $s = \mathrm{poly}(n)$, for example, our lower bound remains $\exp(n^{1-o(1)})$ for all $d = o(\sqrt{\log n})$, whereas Håstad's lower bound is $\exp(n^{o(1)})$ once $d = ω_n(1)$. Our main conceptual contribution is the simple observation that techniques for establishing correlation bounds in circuit complexity can be leveraged to establish such tradeoffs in proof complexity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

New lower bounds for Massively Parallel Computation from query complexity

Roughgarden, Vassilvitskii, and Wang (JACM 18) recently introduced a novel framework for proving lower bounds for Massively Parallel Computation using techniques from boolean function complexity. We extend their framework in two different ways, to capture two common features of Massively Parallel Computation: $\circ$ Adaptivity, where machines can write to and adaptively read from shared memory throughout the execution of the computation. Recent work of Behnezhad et al. (SPAA 19) showed that adaptivity enables significantly improved round complexities for a number of central graph problems. $\circ$ Promise problems, where the algorithm only has to succeed on certain inputs. These inputs may have special structure that is of particular interest, or they may be representative of hard instances of the overall problem. Using this extended framework, we give the first unconditional lower bounds on the complexity of distinguishing whether an input graph is a cycle of length $n$ or two cycles of length $n/2$. This promise problem, 1v2-Cycle, has emerged as a central problem in the study of Massively Parallel Computation. We prove that any adaptive algorithm for the 1v2-Cycle problem with I/O capacity $O(n^{\varepsilon})$ per machine requires $Ω(1/\varepsilon)$ rounds, matching a recent upper bound of Behnezhad et al. In addition to strengthening the connections between Massively Parallel Computation and boolean function complexity, we also develop new machinery to reason about the latter. At the heart of our proofs are optimal lower bounds on the query complexity and approximate certificate complexity of the 1v2-Cycle problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Provable guarantees for decision tree induction: the agnostic setting

We give strengthened provable guarantees on the performance of widely employed and empirically successful {\sl top-down decision tree learning heuristics}. While prior works have focused on the realizable setting, we consider the more realistic and challenging {\sl agnostic} setting. We show that for all monotone functions~$f$ and parameters $s\in \mathbb{N}$, these heuristics construct a decision tree of size $s^{\tilde{O}((\log s)/\varepsilon^2)}$ that achieves error $\le \mathsf{opt}_s + \varepsilon$, where $\mathsf{opt}_s$ denotes the error of the optimal size-$s$ decision tree for $f$. Previously, such a guarantee was not known to be achievable by any algorithm, even one that is not based on top-down heuristics. We complement our algorithmic guarantee with a near-matching $s^{\tildeΩ(\log s)}$ lower bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Power of Many Samples in Query Complexity

The randomized query complexity $R(f)$ of a boolean function $f\colon\{0,1\}^n\to\{0,1\}$ is famously characterized (via Yao's minimax) by the least number of queries needed to distinguish a distribution $D_0$ over $0$-inputs from a distribution $D_1$ over $1$-inputs, maximized over all pairs $(D_0,D_1)$. We ask: Does this task become easier if we allow query access to infinitely many samples from either $D_0$ or $D_1$? We show the answer is no: There exists a hard pair $(D_0,D_1)$ such that distinguishing $D_0^\infty$ from $D_1^\infty$ requires $Θ(R(f))$ many queries. As an application, we show that for any composed function $f\circ g$ we have $R(f\circ g) \geq Ω(\mathrm{fbs}(f)R(g))$ where $\mathrm{fbs}$ denotes fractional block sensitivity.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access