BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

R. F. Bishop

R. F. Bishop contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.str-elquant-phcond-matmath-phmath.MP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
31works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

31 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Non-Hermitian coupled cluster method for non-stationary systems and its interaction-picture reinterpretation

The interaction picture in a non-Hermitian realization is discussed in detail and considered for its practical use in many-body quantum physics. The resulting non-Hermitian interaction-picture (NHIP) description of dynamics, in which both the wave functions and operators belonging to physical observables cease to remain constant in time, is a non-Hermitian generalization of the traditional Dirac picture of standard quantum mechanics, which itself is widely used in quantum field theory calculations. Particular attention is paid here to the variational (or, better, bivariational) and dynamical (i.e., non-stationary) aspects that are characteristic of the coupled cluster method (CCM) techniques that nowadays form one of the most versatile and most accurate of all available formulations of quantum many-body theory. In so doing we expose and exploit multiple parallels between the NHIP and the CCM in its time-dependent versions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Ground-state phases of the spin-1 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice

We study the zero-temperature quantum phase diagram of a spin-1 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice with both nearest-neighbor exchange coupling $J_{1}>0$ and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor coupling $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$, using the coupled cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation, and based on model states with different forms of classical magnetic order. For each we calculate directly in the bulk thermodynamic limit both ground-state low-energy parameters (including the energy per spin, magnetic order parameter, spin stiffness coefficient, and zero-field uniform transverse magnetic susceptibility) and their generalized susceptibilities to various forms of valence-bond crystalline (VBC) order, as well as the energy gap to the lowest-lying spin-triplet excitation. In the range $0 < κ< 1$ we find evidence for four distinct phases. Two of these are quasiclassical phases with antiferromagnetic long-range order, one with 2-sublattice Néel order for $κ< κ_{c_{1}} = 0.250(5)$, and another with 4-sublattice Néel-II order for $κ> κ_{c_{2}} = 0.340(5)$. Two different paramagnetic phases are found to exist in the intermediate region. Over the range $κ_{c_{1}} < κ< κ^{i}_{c} = 0.305(5)$ we find a gapless phase with no discernible magnetic order, which is a strong candidate for being a quantum spin liquid, while over the range $κ^{i}_{c} < κ< κ_{c_{2}}$ we find a gapped phase, which is most likely a lattice nematic with staggered dimer VBC order that breaks the lattice rotational symmetry.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2016arXiv

Large-$s$ expansions for the low-energy parameters of the honeycomb-lattice Heisenberg antiferromagnet with spin quantum number $s$

The coupled cluster method (CCM) is employed to very high orders of approximation to study the ground-state (GS) properties of the spin-$s$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet (with isotropic interactions, all of equal strength, between nearest-neighbour pairs only) on the honeycomb lattice. We calculate with high accuracy the complete set of GS parameters that fully describes the low-energy behaviour of the system, in terms of an effective magnon field theory, viz., the energy per spin, the magnetic order parameter (i.e., the sublattie magnetization), the spin stiffness and the zero-field (uniform, transverse) magnetic susceptibility, for all values of the spin quantum number $s$ in the range $\frac{1}{2} \leq s \leq \frac{9}{2}$. The CCM data points are used to calculate the leading quantum corrections to the classical ($s \rightarrow \infty$) values of these low-energy parameters, considered as large-$s$ asymptotic expansions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: Spin gap and low-energy parameters

We use the coupled cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation to investigate the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice with isotropic Heisenberg interactions of strength $J_{1} > 0$ between nearest-neighbor pairs, $J_{2}>0$ between next-nearest-neighbor pairs, and $J_{3}>0$ between next-next-neareast-neighbor pairs of spins. In particular, we study both the ground-state (GS) and lowest-lying triplet excited-state properties in the case $J_{3}=J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1}$, in the window $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ of the frustration parameter, which includes the (tricritical) point of maximum classical frustration at $κ_{\rm cl} = \frac{1}{2}$. We present GS results for the spin stiffness, $ρ_{s}$, and the zero-field uniform magnetic susceptibility, $χ$, which complement our earlier results for the GS energy per spin, $E/N$, and staggered magnetization, $M$, to yield a complete set of accurate low-energy parameters for the model. Our results all point towards a phase diagram containing two quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases, one with Néel order for $κ< κ_{c_{1}}$, and the other with collinear striped order for $κ> κ_{c_{2}}$. The results for both $χ$ and the spin gap $Δ$ provide compelling evidence for a quantum paramagnetic phase that is gapped over a considerable portion of the intermediate region $κ_{c_{1}} < κ< κ_{c_{2}}$, especially close to the two quantum critical points at $κ_{c_{1}}$ and $κ_{c_{2}}$. Each of our fully independent sets of results for the low-energy parameters is consistent with the values $κ_{c_{1}} = 0.45 \pm 0.02$ and $κ_{c_{2}} = 0.60 \pm 0.02$, and with the transition at $κ_{c_{1}}$ being of continuous (and probably of the deconfined) type and that at $κ_{c_{2}}$ being of first-order type.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Ground-state phase structure of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ anisotropic planar pyrochlore

We study the zero-temperature ground-state (GS) properties of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ anisotropic planar pyrochlore, using the coupled cluster method (CCM) implemented to high orders of approximation. The system comprises a $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model on the checkerboard lattice, with isotropic Heisenberg interactions of strength $J_{1}$ between all nearest-neighbour pairs of spins on the square lattice, and of strength $J_{2}$ between half of the next-nearest-neighbour pairs (in the checkerboard pattern). We calculate results for the GS energy and average local GS on-site magnetization, using various antiferromagnetic classical ground states as CCM model states. We also give results for the susceptibility of one of these states against the formation of crossed-dimer valence-bond crystalline (CDVBC) ordering. The complete GS phase diagram is presented for arbitrary values of the frustration parameter $κ\equiv J_{2}/J_{1}$, and when each of the exchange couplings can take either sign.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Spin-gap study of the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model on the triangular lattice

We use the coupled cluster method implemented at high orders of approximation to study the spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model on the triangular lattice with Heisenberg interactions between nearest-neighbour and next-nearest-neighbour pairs of spins, with coupling strengths $J_{1}>0$ and $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} >0$, respectively. In the window $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ we find that the 3-sublattice 120$^{\circ}$ Néel-ordered and 2-sublattice 180$^{\circ}$ stripe-ordered antiferromagnetic states form the stable ground-state phases in the regions $κ< κ^{c}_{1} = 0.060(10)$ and $κ> κ^{c}_{2} = 0.165(5)$, respectively. The spin-triplet gap is found to vanish over essentially the entire region $κ^{c}_{1} < κ< κ^{c}_{2}$ of the intermediate phase.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Highly frustrated spin-lattice models of magnetism and their quantum phase transitions: A microscopic treatment via the coupled cluster method

We outline how the coupled cluster method of microscopic quantum many-body theory can be utilized in practice to give highly accurate results for the ground-state properties of a wide variety of highly frustrated and strongly correlated spin-lattice models of interest in quantum magnetism, including their quantum phase transitions. The method itself is described, and it is shown how it may be implemented in practice to high orders in a systematically improvable hierarchy of (so-called LSUB$m$) approximations, by the use of computer-algebraic techniques. The method works from the outset in the thermodynamic limit of an infinite lattice at all levels of approximation, and it is shown both how the &#34;raw&#34; LSUB$m$ results are themselves generally excellent in the sense that they converge rapidly, and how they may accurately be extrapolated to the exact limit, $m \rightarrow \infty$, of the truncation index $m$, which denotes the {\it only} approximation made. All of this is illustrated via a specific application to a two-dimensional, frustrated, spin-half $J^{XXZ}_{1}$--$J^{XXZ}_{2}$ model on a honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor interactions with exchange couplings $J_{1}>0$ and $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$, respectively, where both interactions are of the same anisotropic $XXZ$ type. We show how the method can be used to determine the entire zero-temperature ground-state phase diagram of the model in the range $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ of the frustration parameter and $0 \leq Δ\leq 1$ of the spin-space anisotropy parameter. In particular, we identify a candidate quantum spin-liquid region in the phase space.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Phase diagram of a frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ $XXZ$ model on the honeycomb lattice

We study the zero-temperature ($T=0$) ground-state (GS) properties of a frustrated spin-half $J^{XXZ}_{1}$--$J^{XXZ}_{2}$ model on the honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor interactions with exchange couplings $J_{1}>0$ and $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1}>0$, respectively, using the coupled cluster method. Both interactions are of the anisotropic $XXZ$ type. We present the $T=0$ GS phase diagram of the model in the ranges $0 \leq Δ\leq 1$ of the spin-space anisotropy parameter and $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ of the frustration parameter. A possible quantum spin-liquid region is identified.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

The frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ isotropic $XY$ model on the honeycomb lattice

We study the zero-temperature ground-state (GS) phase diagram of a spin-half $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ $XY$ model on the honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor exchange coupling $J_{1}>0$ and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor exchange coupling $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1}>0$, where both bonds are of the isotropic $XY$ type, using the coupled cluster method. Results are presented for the GS energy per spin, magnetic order parameter, and staggered dimer valence-bond crystalline (SDVBC) susceptibility, for values of the frustration parameter in the range $0 \leq κ\leq 1$. In this range we find phases exhibiting, respectively, Néel $xy$ planar [N(p)], Néel $z$-aligned [N($z$)], SDVBC, and Néel-II $xy$ planar [N-II(p)] orderings which break the lattice rotational symmetry. The N(p) state, which is stable for the classical version of the model in the range $0 \leq κ\leq \frac{1}{6}$, is found to form the GS phase out to a first quantum critical point at $κ_{c_{1}} = 0.216(5)$, beyond which the stable GS phase has N($z$) order over the range $κ_{c_{1}} < κ< κ_{c_{2}}=0.355(5)$. For values $κ> κ_{c_{2}}$ we find a strong competition to form the GS phase between states with N-II(p) and SDVBC forms of order. Our best estimate, however, is that the stable GS phase over the range $κ_{c_{2}} < κ< κ_{c_{3}} \approx 0.52(3)$ is a mixed state with both SDVBC and N-II(p) forms of order; and for values $κ> κ_{c_{3}}$ is the N-II(p) state, which is stable at the classical level only at the highly degenerate point $κ=\frac{1}{2}$. Over the range $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ we find no evidence for any of the spiral phases that are present classically for all values $κ> \frac{1}{6}$, nor for any quantum spin-liquid state.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

A frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a chevron-square lattice

The coupled cluster method (CCM) is used to study the zero-temperature properties of a frustrated spin-half ($s={1}{2}$) $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ Heisenberg antiferromagnet (HAF) on a 2D chevron-square lattice. Each site on an underlying square lattice has 4 nearest-neighbor exchange bonds of strength $J_{1}>0$ and 2 next-nearest-neighbor (diagonal) bonds of strength $J_{2} \equiv x J_{1}>0$, with each square plaquette having only one diagonal bond. The diagonal bonds form a chevron pattern, and the model thus interpolates smoothly between 2D HAFs on the square ($x=0$) and triangular ($x=1$) lattices, and also extrapolates to disconnected 1D HAF chains ($x \to \infty$). The classical ($s \to \infty$) version of the model has Néel order for $0 < x < x_{\rm cl}$ and a form of spiral order for $x_{\rm cl} < x < \infty$, where $x_{\rm cl} = {1}{2}$. For the $s={1}{2}$ model we use both these classical states, as well as other collinear states not realized as classical ground-state (GS) phases, as CCM reference states, on top of which the multispin-flip configurations resulting from quantum fluctuations are incorporated in a systematic truncation scheme, which we carry out to high orders and extrapolate to the physical limit. We calculate the GS energy, GS magnetic order parameter, and the susceptibilities of the states to various forms of valence-bond crystalline (VBC) order, including plaquette and two different dimer forms. We find that the $s={1}{2}$ model has two quantum critical points, at $x_{c_{1}} \approx 0.72(1)$ and $x_{c_{2}} \approx 1.5(1)$, with Néel order for $0 < x < x_{c_{1}}$, a form of spiral order for $x_{c_{1}} < x < x_{c_{2}}$ that includes the correct three-sublattice $120^{\circ}$ spin ordering for the triangular-lattice HAF at $x=1$, and parallel-dimer VBC order for $x_{c_{2}} < x < \infty$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Quantum s = 1/2 Antiferromagnets on Archimedean Lattices: The Route from Semiclassical Magnetic Order to Nonmagnetic Quantum States

We investigate ground states of $s$=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnets on the eleven two-dimensional (2D) Archimedian lattices by using the coupled cluster method. Magnetic interactions and quantum fluctuations play against each other subtly in 2D quantum magnets and the magnetic ordering is thus sensitive to the features of lattice topology. Archimedean lattices are those lattices that have 2D arrangements of regular polygons and they often build the underlying magnetic lattices of insulating quasi-two-dimensional quantum magnetic materials. Hence they allow a systematic study of the relationship between lattice topology and magnetic ordering. We find that the Archimedian lattices fall into three groups: those with semiclassical magnetic ground-state long-range order, those with a magnetically disordered (cooperative quantum paramagnetic) ground state, and those with a fragile magnetic order. The most relevant parameters affecting the magnetic ordering are the coordination number and the degree of frustration present.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Spin-1/2 $J_{1}$-$J_{2}$ Heisenberg model on a cross-striped square lattice

Using the coupled cluster method (CCM) we study the full (zero-temperature) ground-state (GS) phase diagram of a spin-half ($s=1/2$) $J_{1}$-$J_{2}$ Heisenberg model on a cross-striped square lattice. Each site of the square lattice has 4 nearest-neighbour exchange bonds of strength $J_{1}$ and 2 next-nearest-neighbour (diagonal) bonds of strength $J_{2}$. The $J_{2}$ bonds are arranged so that the basic square plaquettes in alternating columns have either both or no $J_{2}$ bonds included. The classical ($s \rightarrow \infty$) version of the model has 4 collinear phases when $J_{1}$ and $J_{2}$ can take either sign. Three phases are antiferromagnetic (AFM), showing so-called Néel, double Néel and double columnar striped order respectively, while the fourth is ferromagnetic. For the quantum $s=1/2$ model we use the 3 classical AFM phases as CCM reference states, on top of which the multispin-flip configurations arising from quantum fluctuations are incorporated in a systematic truncation hierarchy. Calculations of the corresponding GS energy, magnetic order parameter and the susceptibilities of the states to various forms of valence-bond crystalline (VBC) order are thus carried out numerically to high orders of approximation and then extrapolated to the (exact) physical limit. We find that the $s=1/2$ model has 5 phases, which correspond to the four classical phases plus a new quantum phase with plaquette VBC order. The positions of the 5 quantum critical points are determined with high accuracy. While all 4 phase transitions in the classical model are first order, we find strong evidence that 3 of the 5 quantum phase transitions in the $s=1/2$ model are of continuous deconfined type.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Valence-bond crystalline order in the $s=1/2$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model on the honeycomb lattice

Using the coupled cluster method we study the phase diagram of the spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor exchange coupling $J_{1}>0$ and frustrating next-nearest-neighbor coupling $J_{2} \equiv xJ_{1}>0$. In the range $0<x<1$ we find four phases exhibiting respectively Néel, 6-spin plaquette, staggered dimer, and Néel-II orderings, with quantum critical points at $x_{c_{1}} \approx 0.207(3), x_{c_{2}} \approx 0.385(10)$, and $x_{c_{3}} \approx 0.65(5)$. The transitions at $x_{c_{1}}$ and $x_{c_{3}}$ appear to be continuous (and hence deconfined) ones, while that at $x_{c_{2}}$ appears to be a direct first-order one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Complete phase diagram of the spin-1/2 $J_{1}$-$J_{2}$-$J_{3}$ model (with $J_{3}=J_{2}$) on the honeycomb lattice

We use the coupled cluster method to investigate the ground-state (GS) properties of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$-$J_{2}$-$J_{3}$ model on the honeycomb lattice, with nearest-neighbor exchange coupling $J_1$ plus next-nearest-neighbor ($J_2$) and next-next-nearest-neighbor ($J_3$) exchanges of equal strength. In particular we find a direct first-order phase transition between the Néel-ordered antiferromagnetic phase and the ferromagnetic phase at a value $J_{2}/J_{1} = -1.17 \pm 0.01$ when $J_{1}>0$, compared to the corresponding classical value of -1. We find no evidence for any intermediate phase. From this and our previous CCM studies of the model we present its full zero-temperature GS phase diagram.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Ground-state phases of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ Heisenberg ferromagnet ($J_{1}<0$) on the honeycomb lattice with $J_{3}=J_{2}>0$

We study the ground-state (gs) properties of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ Heisenberg model on a honeycomb lattice with ferromagnetic (FM) nearest-neighbor ($J_{1}=-1$) exchange and frustrating antiferromagnetic (AFM) next-nearest-neighbor ($J_{2}>0$) and next-next-nearest-neighbor ($J_{3}>0$) exchanges, for the case $J_{3}=J_{2}$. We use the coupled cluster method in high orders of approximation, complemented by the exact diagonalization of a lattice with 32 sites, and calculate the gs energy, magnetic order parameter, and spin-spin correlation functions. We find a quantum phase transition between regions characterized by FM order and a form of AFM (&#34;striped&#34;) collinear order at $J^{c}_{2} \approx 0.1095 \pm 0.0005$. We compare results for the FM case (with $J_{1}=-1$) to previous results for the corresponding AFM case (with $J_{1}=+1$). While the magnetic order parameters behave similarly for the FM and the AFM models for large values of the frustration parameter $J_{2}$, there are considerable differences between them for $J_{2}/|J_{1}| \lesssim 0.6$. For example, the quasiclassical collinear magnetic long-range order for the AFM model (with $J_{1}=+1$) breaks down at $J^{c_{2}}_{2} \approx 0.60$, whereas the &#34;equivalent&#34; point for the FM model (with $J_{1}=-1$) occurs at $J^{c}_{2} \approx 0.11$. Unlike in the AFM model (with $J_{1}=+1$), where a plaquette valence-bond crystal phase intrudes between the two corresponding quasiclassical AFM phases (with Néel and striped order) for $J^{c_{1}}_{2} < J_{2} < J^{c_{2}}_{2}$, with $J^{c_{1}}_{2} \approx 0.47$, we find no clear indications in the FM model for an intermediate magnetically disordered phase between the phases exhibiting FM and striped order. Instead, the evidence points strongly to a direct first-order transition between the two ordered phases of the FM model.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Phase diagram of a frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: the $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ model

We use the coupled cluster method in high orders of approximation to make a comprehensive study of the ground-state (GS) phase diagram of the spin-1/2 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ model on a two-dimensional honeycomb lattice with antiferromagnetic (AFM) interactions up to third-nearest neighbors. Results are presented for the GS energy and the average local on-site magnetization. With the nearest-neighbor coupling strength $J_{1} \equiv 1$ we find four magnetically ordered phases in the parameter window $J_{2},J_{3} \in [0,1]$, namely the Néel (N), striped (S), and anti-Néel (aN) collinear AFM phases, plus a spiral phase. The aN phase appears as a stable GS phase in the classical version of the model only for values $J_{3}<0$. Each of these four ordered phases shares a boundary with a disordered quantum paramagnetic (QP) phase, and at several widely separated points on the phase boundaries the QP phase has an infinite susceptibility to plaquette valence-bond crystalline order. We identify all of the phase boundaries with good precision in the parameter window studied, and we find three tricritical quantum critical points therein at: (a) $(J_{2}^{c_1},J_{3}^{c_1})=(0.51 \pm 0.01,0.69 \pm 0.01)$ between the N, S, and QP phases; (b) $(J_{2}^{c_2},J_{3}^{c_2})=(0.65 \pm 0.02,0.55 \pm 0.01)$ between the S, spiral, and QP phases; and (c) $(J_{2}^{c_3},J_{3}^{c_3})=(0.69 \pm 0.01,0.12 \pm 0.01)$ between the spiral, aN, and QP phases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on an anisotropic kagome lattice

We use the coupled cluster method to study the zero-temperature properties of an extended two-dimensional Heisenberg antiferromagnet formed from spin-1/2 moments on an infinite spatially anisotropic kagome lattice of corner-sharing isosceles triangles, with nearest-neighbor bonds only. The bonds have exchange constants $J_{1}>0$ along two of the three lattice directions and $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$ along the third. In the classical limit the ground-state (GS) phase for $κ< 1/2$ has collinear ferrimagnetic (Néel$&#39;$) order where the $J_2$-coupled chain spins are ferromagnetically ordered in one direction with the remaining spins aligned in the opposite direction, while for $κ> 1/2$ there exists an infinite GS family of canted ferrimagnetic spin states, which are energetically degenerate. For the spin-1/2 case we find that quantum analogs of both these classical states continue to exist as stable GS phases in some regions of the anisotropy parameter $κ$, namely for $0<κ<κ_{c_1}$ for the Néel$&#39;$ state and for (at least part of) the region $κ>κ_{c_2}$ for the canted phase. However, they are now separated by a paramagnetic phase without either sort of magnetic order in the region $κ_{c_1} < κ< κ_{c_2}$, which includes the isotropic kagome point $κ= 1$ where the stable GS phase is now believed to be a topological ($\mathbb{Z}_2$) spin liquid. Our best numerical estimates are $κ_{c_1} = 0.515 \pm 0.015$ and $κ_{c_2} = 1.82 \pm 0.03$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the checkerboard lattice: the $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model

We study the ground-state (gs) phases of the spin-half anisotropic planar pyrochlore (or crossed chain) model using the coupled cluster method (CCM). The model is a frustrated antiferromagnetic (AFM) $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ system on the checkerboard lattice, with nearest-neighbor exchange bonds $J_{1}>0$ and next-nearest-neighbor bonds $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$. Using various AFM classical ground states as CCM model states we present results for their gs energy, average on-site magnetization, and susceptibilities to plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) and crossed-dimer valence-bond crystal (CDVBC) ordering. We show that the state with Neel ordering is the gs phase for $κ< κ_{c_1} \approx 0.80 \pm 0.01$, but that none of the fourfold set of AFM states selected by quantum fluctuations at $O(1/s)$ in a large-$s$ analysis (where $s$ is the spin quantum number) from the infinitely degenerate set of AFM states that form the gs phase for the classical version of the model (for $κ>1$) survives the quantum fluctuations to form a stable magnetically-ordered gs phase for the spin-half case. The Neel state becomes susceptible to PVBC ordering at or very near to $κ= κ_{c_1}$, and the fourfold AFM states become infinitely susceptible to PVBC ordering at $κ= κ_{c_2} \approx 1.22 \pm 0.02$. In turn, we find that these states become infinitely susceptible to CDVBC ordering for all values of $κ$ above a certain critical value at or very near to $κ= κ_{c_2}$. We thus find a Neel-ordered gs phase for $κ<κ_{c_1}$, a PVBC-ordered phase for $κ_{c_1} < κ< κ_{c_2}$, and a CDVBC-ordered phase for $κ> κ_{c_2}$. Both transitions are probably direct ones, although we cannot exclude very narrow coexistence regions confined to $0.79 \lesssim κ\lesssim 0.81$ and $1.20 \lesssim κ\lesssim 1.22$ respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

The frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ model

We study the ground-state (gs) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$ antiferromagnet with $J_{2}=κJ_1>0$ ($J_{1}>0$) on the honeycomb lattice, using the coupled-cluster method. We present results for the ground-state energy, magnetic order parameter and plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) susceptibility. We find a paramagnetic PVBC phase for $κ_{c_1}<κ<κ_{c_2}$, where $κ_{c_1} \approx 0.207 \pm 0.003$ and $κ_{c_2} \approx 0.385 \pm 0.010$. The transition at $κ_{c_1}$ to the Néel phase seems to be a continuous deconfined transition (although we cannot exclude a very narrow intermediate phase in the range $0.21 \lesssim κ\lesssim 0.24$), while that at $κ_{c_2}$ is of first-order type to another quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phase that occurs in the classical version of the model only at the isolated and highly degenerate critical point $κ= 1/2$. The spiral phases that are present classically for all values $κ> 1/6$ are absent for all $κ\lesssim 1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Magnetic order in spin-1 and spin-3/2 interpolating square-triangle Heisenberg antiferromagnets

Using the coupled cluster method we investigate spin-$s$ $J_{1}$-$J_{2}&#39;$ Heisenberg antiferromagnets (HAFs) on an infinite, anisotropic, triangular lattice when the spin quantum number $s=1$ or $s=3/2$. With respect to a square-lattice geometry the model has antiferromagnetic ($J_{1} > 0$) bonds between nearest neighbours and competing ($J_{2}&#39; > 0$) bonds between next-nearest neighbours across only one of the diagonals of each square plaquette, the same one in each square. In a topologically equivalent triangular-lattice geometry, we have two types of nearest-neighbour bonds: namely the $J_{2}&#39; \equiv κJ_{1}$ bonds along parallel chains and the $J_{1}$ bonds producing an interchain coupling. The model thus interpolates between an isotropic HAF on the square lattice at $κ= 0$ and a set of decoupled chains at $κ\rightarrow \infty$, with the isotropic HAF on the triangular lattice in between at $κ= 1$. For both the $s=1$ and the $s=3/2$ models we find a second-order quantum phase transition at $κ_{c}=0.615 \pm 0.010$ and $κ_{c}=0.575 \pm 0.005$ respectively, between a Néel antiferromagnetic state and a helical state. In both cases the ground-state energy $E$ and its first derivative $dE/dκ$ are continuous at $κ=κ_{c}$, while the order parameter for the transition (viz., the average on-site magnetization) does not go to zero on either side of the transition. The transition at $κ= κ_{c}$ for both the $s=1$ and $s=3/2$ cases is analogous to that observed in our previous work for the $s=1/2$ case at a value $κ_{c}=0.80 \pm 0.01$. However, for the higher spin values the transition is of continuous (second-order) type, as in the classical case, whereas for the $s=1/2$ case it appears to be weakly first-order in nature (although a second-order transition could not be excluded).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: A candidate for deconfined quantum criticality

We study the ground-state (gs) phase diagram of the frustrated spin-1/2 $J_{1}$-$J_{2}$-$J_{3}$ antiferromagnet with $J_{2} = J_{3} =κJ_1$ on the honeycomb lattice, using coupled-cluster theory and exact diagonalization methods. We present results for the gs energy, magnetic order parameter, spin-spin correlation function, and plaquette valence-bond crystal (PVBC) susceptibility. We find a Néel antiferromagnetic (AFM) phase for $κ< κ_{c_{1}} \approx 0.47$, a collinear striped AFM phase for $κ> κ_{c_{2}} \approx 0.60$, and a paramagnetic PVBC phase for $κ_{c_{1}} \lesssim κ\lesssim κ_{c_{2}}$. The transition at $κ_{c_{2}}$ appears to be of first-order type, while that at $κ_{c_{1}}$ is continuous. Since the Néel and PVBC phases break different symmetries our results favor the deconfinement scenario for the transition at $κ_{c_{1}}$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

The Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice with arbitrary spin: A high-order coupled cluster treatment

Starting with the sqrt{3} x sqrt{3} and the q=0 states as reference states we use the coupled cluster method to high orders of approximation to investigate the ground state of the Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice for spin quantum numbers s=1/2,1,3/2,2,5/2, and 3. Our data for the ground-state energy for s=1/2 are in good agreement with recent large-scale density-matrix renormalization group and exact diagonalization data. We find that the ground-state selection depends on the spin quantum number s. While for the extreme quantum case, s=1/2, the q=0 state is energetically favored by quantum fluctuations, for any s>1/2 the sqrt{3} x sqrt{3} state is selected. For both the sqrt{3} x sqrt{3} and the q=0 states the magnetic order is strongly suppressed by quantum fluctuations. Within our coupled cluster method we get vanishing values for the order parameter (sublattice magnetization) M for s=1/2 and s=1, but (small) nonzero values for M for s>1. Using the data for the ground-state energy and the order parameter for s=3/2,2,5/2, and 3 we also estimate the leading quantum corrections to the classical values.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A frustrated quantum spin-${\boldmath s}$ model on the Union Jack lattice with spins ${\boldmath s>1/2}$

The zero-temperature phase diagrams of a two-dimensional frustrated quantum antiferromagnetic system, namely the Union Jack model, are studied using the coupled cluster method (CCM) for the two cases when the lattice spins have spin quantum number $s=1$ and $s=3/2$. The system is defined on a square lattice and the spins interact via isotropic Heisenberg interactions such that all nearest-neighbour (NN) exchange bonds are present with identical strength $J_{1}>0$, and only half of the next-nearest-neighbour (NNN) exchange bonds are present with identical strength $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$. The bonds are arranged such that on the $2 \times 2$ unit cell they form the pattern of the Union Jack flag. Clearly, the NN bonds by themselves (viz., with $J_{2}=0$) produce an antiferromagnetic Néel-ordered phase, but as the relative strength $κ$ of the frustrating NNN bonds is increased a phase transition occurs in the classical case ($s \rightarrow \infty$) at $κ^{\rm cl}_{c}=0.5$ to a canted ferrimagnetic phase. In the quantum cases considered here we also find strong evidence for a corresponding phase transition between a Néel-ordered phase and a quantum canted ferrimagnetic phase at a critical coupling $κ_{c_{1}}=0.580 \pm 0.015$ for $s=1$ and $κ_{c_{1}}=0.545 \pm 0.015$ for $s=3/2$. In both cases the ground-state energy $E$ and its first derivative $dE/dκ$ seem continuous, thus providing a typical scenario of a second-order phase transition at $κ=κ_{c_{1}}$, although the order parameter for the transition (viz., the average ground-state on-site magnetization) does not go to zero there on either side of the transition.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Magnetic order in a spin-1/2 interpolating kagome-square Heisenberg antiferromagnet

The coupled cluster method is applied to a spin-half model at zero temperature ($T=0$), which interpolates between Heisenberg antiferromagnets (HAF&#39;s) on a kagome and a square lattice. With respect to an underlying triangular lattice the strengths of the Heisenberg bonds joining the nearest-neighbor (NN) kagome sites are $J_{1} \geq 0$ along two of the equivalent directions and $J_{2} \geq 0$ along the third. Sites connected by $J_{2}$ bonds are themselves connected to the missing NN non-kagome sites of the triangular lattice by bonds of strength $J_{1}&#39; \geq 0$. When $J_{1}&#39;=J_{1}$ and $J_{2}=0$ the model reduces to the square-lattice HAF. The magnetic ordering of the system is investigated and its $T=0$ phase diagram discussed. Results for the kagome HAF limit are among the best available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Magnetic order on a frustrated spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the Union Jack lattice

We use the coupled cluster method (CCM) to study the zero-temperature phase diagram of a 2D frustrated spin-half antiferromagnet, the so-called Union Jack model. It is defined on a square lattice such that all nearest-neighbor bonds are present with a strength $J_{1} > 0$, but only half the next-nearest-neighbor bonds are present with a strength $J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1} > 0$. The bonds are arranged such that on the $2 \times 2$ unit cell they form the pattern of the Union Jack flag. We find strong evidence for a first phase transition between a Néel phase and a canted ferrimagnetic phase at a critical coupling $κ_{c_{1}} = 0.66 \pm 0.02$. At the transition the energy and its first derivative seem continuous, thus providing a typical scenario of a second-order transition, although a weakly first-order transition cannot be excluded. By contrast, the average on-site magnetization $M$ approaches a nonzero value $M_{c_{1}}=0.195 \pm 0.005$ on both sides of the transition, which is more typical of a first-order transition. The slope $dM/dκ$ also appears to be continuous, or very nearly so, at the critical point $κ_{c_{1}}$. We find strong evidence that the canted phase becomes unstable at large values of $κ$, and hence we have also used the CCM with a model collinear semi-stripe-ordered ferrimagnetic state in which alternating rows (and columns) are ferromagnetically and antiferromagnetically ordered. We find tentative evidence, based on the relative energies of the two states, for a second (first-order) phase transition between the canted and semi-stripe-ordered states at a large value of the coupling parameter around $κ_{c_{2}} \approx 125 \pm 5$. This prediction, however, is based on an extrapolation of the CCM results for the canted state into regimes where the CCM equations at any level of approximation beyond the lowest have no solutions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

Magnetic order in a spin-half interpolating square-triangle Heisenberg antiferromagnet

Using the coupled cluster method we study the zero-temperature phase diagram of a spin-half Heisenberg antiferromagnet (HAF), the so-called $J_{1}$--$J_{2}&#39;$ model, defined on an anisotropic 2D lattice. With respect to an underlying square-lattice geometry the model contains antiferromagnetic ($J_{1} > 0$) bonds between nearest neighbors and competing ($J_{2}&#39;>0$) bonds between next-nearest neighbors across only one of the diagonals of each square plaquette, the same diagonal in every square. Considered on an equivalent triangular-lattice geometry the model may be regarded as having two sorts of nearest-neighbor bonds, with $J_{2}&#39; \equiv κJ_{1}$ bonds along parallel chains and $J_{1}$ bonds providing an interchain coupling. Hence, the model interpolates between a spin-half HAF on the square lattice at one extreme ($κ= 0$) and a set of decoupled spin-half chains at the other ($κ\to \infty$), with the spin-half HAF on the triangular lattice in between at $κ= 1$. We find strong evidence that quantum fluctuations favor a first-order transition from quasiclassical Néel order to a quantum helical state at a first critical point at $κ_{c_{1}} = 0.80 \pm 0.01$, by contrast with the corresponding second-order transition between the equivalent classical states at $κ_{\rm cl} = 0.5$. We also find strong evidence for a second critical point at $κ_{c_{2}} = 1.8 \pm 0.4$ where another first-order transition occurs, this time from the quantum helical phase to a collinear stripe-ordered phase. This latter result provides quantitative verification of a recent qualitative prediction of Starykh and Balents [Phys.\ Rev. Lett. {\bf 98}, 077205 (2007)] for the $J_{1}$--$J_{2}&#39;$ model that did not, however, evaluate the corresponding critical point.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2008arXiv

The quantum $J_{1}$--$J_{1}&#39;$--$J_{2}$ spin-1 Heisenberg model: Influence of the interchain coupling on the ground-state magnetic ordering in 2D

We study the phase diagram of the isotropic $J_{1}$--$J_{1}&#39;$--$J_{2}$ Heisenberg model for spin-1 particles on an anisotropic square lattice, using the coupled cluster method. We find no evidence for an intermediate phase between the Néel and stripe states, as compared with all previous results for the corresponding spin-1/2 case. However, we find a quantum tricritical point at $J_{1}&#39;/J_{1} \approx0.66 \pm 0.03$, $J_{2}/J_{1} \approx0.35\pm0.02$, where a line of second-order phase transitions between the quasi-classical Néel and stripe-ordered phases (for $J_{1}&#39;/J_{1} \lesssim 0.66$) meets a line of first-order phase transitions between the same two states (for $J_{1}&#39;/J_{1} \gtrsim 0.66$)

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2003arXiv

Coupled Cluster Method Calculations Of Quantum Magnets With Spins Of General Spin Quantum Number

We present a new high-order coupled cluster method (CCM) formalism for the ground states of lattice quantum spin systems for general spin quantum number, $s$. This new ``general-$s$&#39;&#39; formalism is found to be highly suitable for a computational implementation, and the technical details of this implementation are given. To illustrate our new formalism we perform high-order CCM calculations for the one-dimensional spin-half and spin-one antiferromagnetic {\it XXZ} models and for the one-dimensional spin-half/spin-one ferrimagnetic {\it XXZ} model. The results for the ground-state properties of the isotropic points of these systems are seen to be in excellent quantitative agreement with exact results for the special case of the spin-half antiferromagnet and results of density matrix renormalisation group (DMRG) calculations for the other systems. Extrapolated CCM results for the sublattice magnetisation of the spin-half antiferromagnet closely follow the exact Bethe Ansatz solution, which contains an infinite-order phase transition at $Δ=1$. By contrast, extrapolated CCM results for the sublattice magnetisation of the spin-one antiferromagnet using this same scheme are seen to go to zero at $Δ\approx 1.2$, which is in excellent agreement with the value for the onset of the Haldane phase for this model. Results for sublattice magnetisations of the ferrimagnet for both the spin-half and spin-one spins are non-zero and finite across a wide range of $Δ$, up to and including the Heisenberg point at $Δ=1$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2002arXiv

Bogoliubov transformations and exact isolated solutions for simple non-adiabatic Hamiltonians

We present a new method for finding isolated exact solutions of a class of non-adiabatic Hamiltonians of relevance to quantum optics and allied areas. Central to our approach is the use of Bogoliubov transformations of the bosonic fields in the models. We demonstrate the simplicity and efficiency of this method by applying it to the Rabi Hamiltonian.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2000arXiv

High-Order Coupled Cluster Method Calculations for the Ground- and Excited-State Properties of the Spin-Half XXZ Model

In this article, we present new results of high-order coupled cluster method (CCM) calculations, based on a Néel model state with spins aligned in the $z$-direction, for both the ground- and excited-state properties of the spin-half {\it XXZ} model on the linear chain, the square lattice, and the simple cubic lattice. In particular, the high-order CCM formalism is extended to treat the excited states of lattice quantum spin systems for the first time. Completely new results for the excitation energy gap of the spin-half {\it XXZ} model for these lattices are thus determined. These high-order calculations are based on a localised approximation scheme called the LSUB$m$ scheme in which we retain all $k$-body correlations defined on all possible locales of $m$ adjacent lattice sites ($k \le m$). The ``raw&#39;&#39; CCM LSUB$m$ results are seen to provide very good results for the ground-state energy, sublattice magnetisation, and the value of the lowest-lying excitation energy for each of these systems. However, in order to obtain even better results, two types of extrapolation scheme of the LSUB$m$ results to the limit $m \to \infty$ (i.e., the exact solution in the thermodynamic limit) are presented. The extrapolated results provide extremely accurate results for the ground- and excited-state properties of these systems across a wide range of values of the anisotropy parameter.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1999arXiv

The Extended Coupled Cluster Treatment of Correlations in Quantum Magnets

The spin-half XXZ model on the linear chain and the square lattice are examined with the extended coupled cluster method (ECCM) of quantum many-body theory. We are able to describe both the Ising-Heisenberg phase and the XY-Heisenberg phase, starting from known wave functions in the Ising limit and at the phase transition point between the XY-Heisenberg and ferromagnetic phases, respectively, and by systematically incorporating correlations on top of them. The ECCM yields good numerical results via a diagrammatic approach, which makes the numerical implementation of higher-order truncation schemes feasible. In particular, the best non-extrapolated coupled cluster result for the sublattice magnetization is obtained, which indicates the employment of an improved wave function. Furthermore, the ECCM finds the expected qualitatively different behaviours of the linear chain and the square lattice cases.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access