Paper detail

Magnetic order in spin-1 and spin-3/2 interpolating square-triangle Heisenberg antiferromagnets

Using the coupled cluster method we investigate spin-$s$ $J_{1}$-$J_{2}'$ Heisenberg antiferromagnets (HAFs) on an infinite, anisotropic, triangular lattice when the spin quantum number $s=1$ or $s=3/2$. With respect to a square-lattice geometry the model has antiferromagnetic ($J_{1} > 0$) bonds between nearest neighbours and competing ($J_{2}' > 0$) bonds between next-nearest neighbours across only one of the diagonals of each square plaquette, the same one in each square. In a topologically equivalent triangular-lattice geometry, we have two types of nearest-neighbour bonds: namely the $J_{2}' \equiv κJ_{1}$ bonds along parallel chains and the $J_{1}$ bonds producing an interchain coupling. The model thus interpolates between an isotropic HAF on the square lattice at $κ= 0$ and a set of decoupled chains at $κ\rightarrow \infty$, with the isotropic HAF on the triangular lattice in between at $κ= 1$. For both the $s=1$ and the $s=3/2$ models we find a second-order quantum phase transition at $κ_{c}=0.615 \pm 0.010$ and $κ_{c}=0.575 \pm 0.005$ respectively, between a Néel antiferromagnetic state and a helical state. In both cases the ground-state energy $E$ and its first derivative $dE/dκ$ are continuous at $κ=κ_{c}$, while the order parameter for the transition (viz., the average on-site magnetization) does not go to zero on either side of the transition. The transition at $κ= κ_{c}$ for both the $s=1$ and $s=3/2$ cases is analogous to that observed in our previous work for the $s=1/2$ case at a value $κ_{c}=0.80 \pm 0.01$. However, for the higher spin values the transition is of continuous (second-order) type, as in the classical case, whereas for the $s=1/2$ case it appears to be weakly first-order in nature (although a second-order transition could not be excluded).

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.