Paper detail

Frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice: Spin gap and low-energy parameters

We use the coupled cluster method implemented to high orders of approximation to investigate the frustrated spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ $J_{1}$--$J_{2}$--$J_{3}$ antiferromagnet on the honeycomb lattice with isotropic Heisenberg interactions of strength $J_{1} > 0$ between nearest-neighbor pairs, $J_{2}>0$ between next-nearest-neighbor pairs, and $J_{3}>0$ between next-next-neareast-neighbor pairs of spins. In particular, we study both the ground-state (GS) and lowest-lying triplet excited-state properties in the case $J_{3}=J_{2} \equiv κJ_{1}$, in the window $0 \leq κ\leq 1$ of the frustration parameter, which includes the (tricritical) point of maximum classical frustration at $κ_{\rm cl} = \frac{1}{2}$. We present GS results for the spin stiffness, $ρ_{s}$, and the zero-field uniform magnetic susceptibility, $χ$, which complement our earlier results for the GS energy per spin, $E/N$, and staggered magnetization, $M$, to yield a complete set of accurate low-energy parameters for the model. Our results all point towards a phase diagram containing two quasiclassical antiferromagnetic phases, one with Néel order for $κ< κ_{c_{1}}$, and the other with collinear striped order for $κ> κ_{c_{2}}$. The results for both $χ$ and the spin gap $Δ$ provide compelling evidence for a quantum paramagnetic phase that is gapped over a considerable portion of the intermediate region $κ_{c_{1}} < κ< κ_{c_{2}}$, especially close to the two quantum critical points at $κ_{c_{1}}$ and $κ_{c_{2}}$. Each of our fully independent sets of results for the low-energy parameters is consistent with the values $κ_{c_{1}} = 0.45 \pm 0.02$ and $κ_{c_{2}} = 0.60 \pm 0.02$, and with the transition at $κ_{c_{1}}$ being of continuous (and probably of the deconfined) type and that at $κ_{c_{2}}$ being of first-order type.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.