BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Prosenjit Bose

Prosenjit Bose contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Computational GeometryData Structures and Algorithmsmath.CODiscrete Mathematics

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
9works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

9 published item(s)

preprint2025arXiv

Noncrossing Longest Paths and Cycles

Edge crossings in geometric graphs are sometimes undesirable as they could lead to unwanted situations such as collisions in motion planning and inconsistency in VLSI layout. Short geometric structures such as shortest perfect matchings, shortest spanning trees, shortest spanning paths, and shortest spanning cycles on a given point set are inherently noncrossing. However, the longest such structures need not be noncrossing. In fact, it is intuitive to expect many edge crossings in various geometric graphs that are longest. Recently, Álvarez-Rebollar, Cravioto-Lagos, Marín, Solé-Pi, and Urrutia (Graphs and Combinatorics, 2024) constructed a set of points for which the longest perfect matching is noncrossing. They raised several challenging questions in this direction. In particular, they asked whether the longest spanning path, on any finite set of points in the plane, must have a pair of crossing edges. They also conjectured that the longest spanning cycle must have a pair of crossing edges. In this paper, we give a negative answer to the question and also refute the conjecture. We present a framework for constructing arbitrarily large point sets for which the longest perfect matchings, the longest spanning paths, and the longest spanning cycles are noncrossing.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

An Optimal Algorithm for Product Structure in Planar Graphs

The \emph{Product Structure Theorem} for planar graphs (Dujmović et al.\ \emph{JACM}, \textbf{67}(4):22) states that any planar graph is contained in the strong product of a planar $3$-tree, a path, and a $3$-cycle. We give a simple linear-time algorithm for finding this decomposition as well as several related decompositions. This improves on the previous $O(n\log n)$ time algorithm (Morin.\ \emph{Algorithmica}, \textbf{85}(5):1544--1558).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Asymptotically Optimal Vertex Ranking of Planar Graphs

A (vertex) $\ell$-ranking is a colouring $φ:V(G)\to\mathbb{N}$ of the vertices of a graph $G$ with integer colours so that for any path $u_0,\ldots,u_p$ of length at most $\ell$, $φ(u_0)\neqφ(u_p)$ or $φ(u_0)<\max\{φ(u_0),\ldots,φ(u_p)\}$. We show that, for any fixed integer $\ell\ge 2$, every $n$-vertex planar graph has an $\ell$-ranking using $O(\log n/\log\log\log n)$ colours and this is tight even when $\ell=2$; for infinitely many values of $n$, there are $n$-vertex planar graphs, for which any 2-ranking requires $Ω(\log n/\log\log\log n)$ colours. This result also extends to bounded genus graphs. In developing this proof we obtain optimal bounds on the number of colours needed for $\ell$-ranking graphs of treewidth $t$ and graphs of simple treewidth $t$. These upper bounds are constructive and give $O(n)$-time algorithms. Additional results that come from our techniques include new sublogarithmic upper bounds on the number of colours needed for $\ell$-rankings of apex minor-free graphs and $k$-planar graphs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Pursuit-Evasion in Graphs: Zombies, Lazy Zombies and a Survivor

We study zombies and survivor, a variant of the game of cops and robber on graphs. In this variant, the single survivor plays the role of the robber and attempts to escape from the zombies that play the role of the cops. The zombies are restricted, on their turn, to always follow an edge of a shortest path towards the survivor. Let $z(G)$ be the smallest number of zombies required to catch the survivor on a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices. We show that there exist outerplanar graphs and visibility graphs of simple polygons such that $z(G) = Θ(n)$. We also show that there exist maximum-degree-$3$ outerplanar graphs such that $z(G) = Ω\left(n/\log(n)\right)$. Let $z_L(G)$ be the smallest number of lazy zombies (zombies that can stay still on their turn) required to catch the survivor on a graph $G$. We establish that lazy zombies are more powerful than normal zombies but less powerful than cops. We prove that $z_L(G) = 2$ for connected outerplanar graphs. We show that $z_L(G)\leq k$ for connected graphs with treedepth $k$. This result implies that $z_L(G)$ is at most $(k+1)\log n$ for connected graphs with treewidth $k$, $O(\sqrt{n})$ for connected planar graphs, $O(\sqrt{gn})$ for connected graphs with genus $g$ and $O(h\sqrt{hn})$ for connected graphs with any excluded $h$-vertex minor. Our results on lazy zombies still hold when an adversary chooses the initial positions of the zombies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Constrained Routing Between Non-Visible Vertices

In this paper we study local routing strategies on geometric graphs. Such strategies use geometric properties of the graph like the coordinates of the current and target nodes to route. Specifically, we study routing strategies in the presence of constraints which are obstacles that edges of the graph are not allowed to cross. Let $P$ be a set of $n$ points in the plane and let $S$ be a set of line segments whose endpoints are in $P$, with no two line segments intersecting properly. We present the first deterministic 1-local $O(1)$-memory routing algorithm that is guaranteed to find a path between two vertices in the visibility graph of $P$ with respect to a set of constraints $S$. The strategy never looks beyond the direct neighbors of the current node and does not store more than $O(1)$-information to reach the target. We then turn our attention to finding competitive routing strategies. We show that when routing on any triangulation $T$ of $P$ such that $S\subseteq T$, no $o(n)$-competitive routing algorithm exists when the routing strategy restricts its attention to the triangles intersected by the line segment from the source to the target (a technique commonly used in the unconstrained setting). Finally, we provide an $O(n)$-competitive deterministic 1-local $O(1)$-memory routing algorithm on any such $T$, which is optimal in the worst case, given the lower bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Fragile Complexity of Adaptive Algorithms

The fragile complexity of a comparison-based algorithm is $f(n)$ if each input element participates in $O(f(n))$ comparisons. In this paper, we explore the fragile complexity of algorithms adaptive to various restrictions on the input, i.e., algorithms with a fragile complexity parameterized by a quantity other than the input size n. We show that searching for the predecessor in a sorted array has fragile complexity $Θ(\log k)$, where $k$ is the rank of the query element, both in a randomized and a deterministic setting. For predecessor searches, we also show how to optimally reduce the amortized fragile complexity of the elements in the array. We also prove the following results: Selecting the $k$-th smallest element has expected fragile complexity $O(\log \log k)$ for the element selected. Deterministically finding the minimum element has fragile complexity $Θ(\log(Inv))$ and $Θ(\log(Runs))$, where $Inv$ is the number of inversions in a sequence and $Runs$ is the number of increasing runs in a sequence. Deterministically finding the median has fragile complexity $O(\log(Runs) + \log \log n)$ and $Θ(\log(Inv))$. Deterministic sorting has fragile complexity $Θ(\log(Inv))$ but it has fragile complexity $Θ(\log n)$ regardless of the number of runs.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

(Faster) Multi-Sided Boundary Labelling

A 1-bend boundary labelling problem consists of an axis-aligned rectangle $B$, $n$ points (called sites) in the interior, and $n$ points (called ports) on the labels along the boundary of $B$. The goal is to find a set of $n$ axis-aligned curves (called leaders), each having at most one bend and connecting one site to one port, such that the leaders are pairwise disjoint. A 1-bend boundary labelling problem is $k$-sided ($1\leq k\leq 4$) if the ports appear on $k$ different sides of $B$. Kindermann et al. [&#34;Multi-Sided Boundary Labeling&#34;, Algorithmica, 76(1): 225-258, 2016] showed that the 1-bend three-sided and four-sided boundary labelling problems can be solved in $O(n^4)$ and $O(n^9)$ time, respectively. Bose et al. [SWAT, 12:1-12:14, 2018] improved the latter running time to $O(n^6)$ by reducing the problem to computing maximum independent set in an outerstring graph. In this paper, we improve both previous results by giving new algorithms with running times $O(n^3\log n)$ and $O(n^5)$ to solve the 1-bend three-sided and four-sided boundary labelling problems, respectively.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Drawing Graphs as Spanners

We study the problem of embedding graphs in the plane as good geometric spanners. That is, for a graph $G$, the goal is to construct a straight-line drawing $Γ$ of $G$ in the plane such that, for any two vertices $u$ and $v$ of $G$, the ratio between the minimum length of any path from $u$ to $v$ and the Euclidean distance between $u$ and $v$ is small. The maximum such ratio, over all pairs of vertices of $G$, is the spanning ratio of $Γ$. First, we show that deciding whether a graph admits a straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$, a proper straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$, and a planar straight-line drawing with spanning ratio $1$ are NP-complete, $\exists \mathbb R$-complete, and linear-time solvable problems, respectively, where a drawing is proper if no two vertices overlap and no edge overlaps a vertex. Second, we show that moving from spanning ratio $1$ to spanning ratio $1+ε$ allows us to draw every graph. Namely, we prove that, for every $ε>0$, every (planar) graph admits a proper (resp. planar) straight-line drawing with spanning ratio smaller than $1+ε$. Third, our drawings with spanning ratio smaller than $1+ε$ have large edge-length ratio, that is, the ratio between the length of the longest edge and the length of the shortest edge is exponential. We show that this is sometimes unavoidable. More generally, we identify having bounded toughness as the criterion that distinguishes graphs that admit straight-line drawings with constant spanning ratio and polynomial edge-length ratio from graphs that require exponential edge-length ratio in any straight-line drawing with constant spanning ratio.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Parameterized Complexity of Two-Interval Pattern Problem

A \emph{2-interval} is the union of two disjoint intervals on the real line. Two 2-intervals $D_1$ and $D_2$ are \emph{disjoint} if their intersection is empty (i.e., no interval of $D_1$ intersects any interval of $D_2$). There can be three different relations between two disjoint 2-intervals; namely, preceding ($<$), nested ($\sqsubset$) and crossing ($\between$). Two 2-intervals $D_1$ and $D_2$ are called \emph{$R$-comparable} for some $R\in\{<,\sqsubset,\between\}$, if either $D_1RD_2$ or $D_2RD_1$. A set $\mathcal{D}$ of disjoint 2-intervals is $\mathcal{R}$-comparable, for some $\mathcal{R}\subseteq\{<,\sqsubset,\between\}$ and $\mathcal{R}\neq\emptyset$, if every pair of 2-intervals in $\mathcal{R}$ are $R$-comparable for some $R\in\mathcal{R}$. Given a set of 2-intervals and some $\mathcal{R}\subseteq\{<,\sqsubset,\between\}$, the objective of the \emph{2-interval pattern problem} is to find a largest subset of 2-intervals that is $\mathcal{R}$-comparable. The 2-interval pattern problem is known to be $W[1]$-hard when $|\mathcal{R}|=3$ and $NP$-hard when $|\mathcal{R}|=2$ (except for $\mathcal{R}=\{<,\sqsubset\}$, which is solvable in quadratic time). In this paper, we fully settle the parameterized complexity of the problem by showing it to be $W[1]$-hard for both $\mathcal{R}=\{\sqsubset,\between\}$ and $\mathcal{R}=\{<,\between\}$ (when parameterized by the size of an optimal solution); this answers an open question posed by Vialette [Encyclopedia of Algorithms, 2008].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access