Paper detail

Probing Convex Polygons with a Wedge

Minimizing the number of probes is one of the main challenges in reconstructing geometric objects with probing devices. In this paper, we investigate the problem of using an $ω$-wedge probing tool to determine the exact shape and orientation of a convex polygon. An $ω$-wedge consists of two rays emanating from a point called the apex of the wedge and the two rays forming an angle $ω$. To probe with an $ω$-wedge, we set the direction that the apex of the probe has to follow, the line $\overrightarrow L$, and the initial orientation of the two rays. A valid $ω$-probe of a convex polygon $O$ contains $O$ within the $ω$-wedge and its outcome consists of the coordinates of the apex, the orientation of both rays and the coordinates of the closest (to the apex) points of contact between $O$ and each of the rays. We present algorithms minimizing the number of probes and prove their optimality. In particular, we show how to reconstruct a convex $n$-gon (with all internal angles of size larger than $ω$) using $2n-2$ $ω$-probes; if $ω= π/2$, the reconstruction uses $2n-3$ $ω$-probes. We show that both results are optimal. Let $N_B$ be the number of vertices of $O$ whose internal angle is at most $ω$, (we show that $0 \leq N_B \leq 3$). We determine the shape and orientation of a general convex $n$-gon with $N_B=1$ (respectively $N_B=2$, $N_B=3$) using $2n-1$ (respectively $2n+3$, $2n+5$) $ω$-probes. We prove optimality for the first case. Assuming the algorithm knows the value of $N_B$ in advance, the reconstruction of $O$ with $N_B=2$ or $N_B=3$ can be achieved with $2n+2$ probes,- which is optimal.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.