Abstract

We present improved upper and lower bounds on the spanning ratio of θθ-graphs with at least six cones. Given a set of points in the plane, a θθ-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into mm disjoint cones, each having aperture θ=2π/mθ=2π/m, and adds an edge to the `closest' vertex in each cone. We show that for any integer k≥1k \geq 1, θθ-graphs with 4k+24k+2 cones have a spanning ratio of 1+2sin⁡(θ/2)1+2\sin(θ/2) and we provide a matching lower bound, showing that this spanning ratio tight. Next, we show that for any integer k≥1k \geq 1, θθ-graphs with 4k+44k+4 cones have spanning ratio at most 1+2sin⁡(θ/2)/(cos⁡(θ/2)−sin⁡(θ/2))1+2\sin(θ/2)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(θ/2)). We also show that θθ-graphs with 4k+34k+3 and 4k+54k+5 cones have spanning ratio at most cos⁡(θ/4)/(cos⁡(θ/2)−sin⁡(3θ/4))\cos(θ/4)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(3θ/4)). This is a significant improvement on all families of θθ-graphs for which exact bounds are not known. For example, the spanning ratio of the θθ-graph with 7 cones is decreased from at most 7.5625 to at most 3.5132. These spanning proofs also imply improved upper bounds on the competitiveness of the θθ-routing algorithm. In particular, we show that the θθ-routing algorithm is (1+2sin⁡(θ/2)/(cos⁡(θ/2)−sin⁡(θ/2)))(1+2\sin(θ/2)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(θ/2)))-competitive on θθ-graphs with 4k+44k+4 cones and that this ratio is tight. Finally, we present improved lower bounds on the spanning ratio of these graphs. Using these bounds, we provide a partial order on these families of θθ-graphs. In particular, we show that θθ-graphs with 4k+44k+4 cones have spanning ratio at least 1+2tan⁡(θ/2)+2tan⁡2(θ/2)1+2\tan(θ/2)+2\tan^2(θ/2). This is somewhat surprising since, for equal values of kk, the spanning ratio of θθ-graphs with 4k+44k+4 cones is greater than that of θθ-graphs with 4k+24k+2 cones, showing that increasing the number of cones can make the spanning ratio worse.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.