Paper detail

Towards Tight Bounds on Theta-Graphs

We present improved upper and lower bounds on the spanning ratio of $θ$-graphs with at least six cones. Given a set of points in the plane, a $θ$-graph partitions the plane around each vertex into $m$ disjoint cones, each having aperture $θ=2π/m$, and adds an edge to the `closest' vertex in each cone. We show that for any integer $k \geq 1$, $θ$-graphs with $4k+2$ cones have a spanning ratio of $1+2\sin(θ/2)$ and we provide a matching lower bound, showing that this spanning ratio tight. Next, we show that for any integer $k \geq 1$, $θ$-graphs with $4k+4$ cones have spanning ratio at most $1+2\sin(θ/2)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(θ/2))$. We also show that $θ$-graphs with $4k+3$ and $4k+5$ cones have spanning ratio at most $\cos(θ/4)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(3θ/4))$. This is a significant improvement on all families of $θ$-graphs for which exact bounds are not known. For example, the spanning ratio of the $θ$-graph with 7 cones is decreased from at most 7.5625 to at most 3.5132. These spanning proofs also imply improved upper bounds on the competitiveness of the $θ$-routing algorithm. In particular, we show that the $θ$-routing algorithm is $(1+2\sin(θ/2)/(\cos(θ/2)-\sin(θ/2)))$-competitive on $θ$-graphs with $4k+4$ cones and that this ratio is tight. Finally, we present improved lower bounds on the spanning ratio of these graphs. Using these bounds, we provide a partial order on these families of $θ$-graphs. In particular, we show that $θ$-graphs with $4k+4$ cones have spanning ratio at least $1+2\tan(θ/2)+2\tan^2(θ/2)$. This is somewhat surprising since, for equal values of $k$, the spanning ratio of $θ$-graphs with $4k+4$ cones is greater than that of $θ$-graphs with $4k+2$ cones, showing that increasing the number of cones can make the spanning ratio worse.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.