BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Prasad Raghavendra

Prasad Raghavendra contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational ComplexityArtificial IntelligenceDiscrete MathematicsInformation TheoryMachine Learningmath.COmath.FAmath.ITmath.PRmath.STSocial and Information NetworksStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
11works
0followers
13topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

11 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Noise stability on the Boolean hypercube via a renormalized Brownian motion

We consider a variant of the classical notion of noise on the Boolean hypercube which gives rise to a new approach to inequalities regarding noise stability. We use this approach to give a new proof of the Majority is Stablest theorem by Mossel, O'Donnell, and Oleszkiewicz, improving the dependence of the bound on the maximal influence of the function from logarithmic to polynomial. We also show that a variant of the conjecture by Courtade and Kumar regarding the most informative Boolean function, where the classical noise is replaced by our notion, holds true. Our approach is based on a stochastic construction that we call the renormalized Brownian motion, which facilitates the use of inequalities in Gaussian space in the analysis of Boolean functions.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

List Decodable Subspace Recovery

Learning from data in the presence of outliers is a fundamental problem in statistics. In this work, we study robust statistics in the presence of overwhelming outliers for the fundamental problem of subspace recovery. Given a dataset where an $α$ fraction (less than half) of the data is distributed uniformly in an unknown $k$ dimensional subspace in $d$ dimensions, and with no additional assumptions on the remaining data, the goal is to recover a succinct list of $O(\frac{1}α)$ subspaces one of which is nontrivially correlated with the planted subspace. We provide the first polynomial time algorithm for the 'list decodable subspace recovery' problem, and subsume it under a more general framework of list decoding over distributions that are "certifiably resilient" capturing state of the art results for list decodable mean estimation and regression.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Local Statistics, Semidefinite Programming, and Community Detection

We propose a new hierarchy of semidefinite programming relaxations for inference problems. As test cases, we consider the problem of community detection in block models. The vertices are partitioned into $k$ communities, and a graph is sampled conditional on a prescribed number of inter- and intra-community edges. The problem of detection, where we are to decide with high probability whether a graph was drawn from this model or the uniform distribution on regular graphs, is conjectured to undergo a computational phase transition at a point called the Kesten-Stigum (KS) threshold. In this work, we consider two models of random graphs namely the well-studied (irregular) stochastic block model and a distribution over random regular graphs we'll call the Degree Regular Block Model. For both these models, we show that sufficiently high constant levels of our hierarchy can perform detection arbitrarily close to the KS threshold and that our algorithm is robust to up to a linear number of adversarial edge perturbations. Furthermore, in the case of Degree Regular Block Model (DRBM), we show that below the Kesten-Stigum threshold no constant level can do so. In the case of the (irregular) Stochastic Block Model, it is known that efficient algorithms exist all the way down to this threshold, although none are robust to a linear number of adversarial perturbations of the graph when the average degree is small. More importantly, there is little complexity-theoretic evidence that detection is hard below the threshold. In the DRBM with more than two groups, it has not to our knowledge been proven that any algorithm succeeds down to the KS threshold, let alone that one can do so robustly, and there is a similar dearth of evidence for hardness below this point.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

The Complexity of Approximating Vertex Expansion

We study the complexity of approximating the vertex expansion of graphs $G = (V,E)$, defined as \[ Φ^V := \min_{S \subset V} n \cdot \frac{|N(S)|}{|S| |V \backslash S|}. \] We give a simple polynomial-time algorithm for finding a subset with vertex expansion $O(\sqrt{OPT \log d})$ where $d$ is the maximum degree of the graph. Our main result is an asymptotically matching lower bound: under the Small Set Expansion (SSE) hypothesis, it is hard to find a subset with expansion less than $C\sqrt{OPT \log d}$ for an absolute constant $C$. In particular, this implies for all constant $ε> 0$, it is SSE-hard to distinguish whether the vertex expansion $< ε$ or at least an absolute constant. The analogous threshold for edge expansion is $\sqrt{OPT}$ with no dependence on the degree; thus our results suggest that vertex expansion is harder to approximate than edge expansion. In particular, while Cheeger&#39;s algorithm can certify constant edge expansion, it is SSE-hard to certify constant vertex expansion in graphs. Our proof is via a reduction from the {\it Unique Games} instance obtained from the \SSE hypothesis to the vertex expansion problem. It involves the definition of a smoother intermediate problem we call {\sf Analytic Vertex Expansion} which is representative of both the vertex expansion and the conductance of the graph. Both reductions (from the UGC instance to this problem and from this problem to vertex expansion) use novel proof ideas.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

On Mimicking Networks Representing Minimum Terminal Cuts

Given a capacitated undirected graph $G=(V,E)$ with a set of terminals $K \subset V$, a mimicking network is a smaller graph $H=(V_H,E_H)$ that exactly preserves all the minimum cuts between the terminals. Specifically, the vertex set of the sparsifier $V_H$ contains the set of terminals $K$ and for every bipartition $U, K-U $ of the terminals $K$, the size of the minimum cut separating $U$ from $K-U$ in $G$ is exactly equal to the size of the minimum cut separating $U$ from $K-U$ in $H$. This notion of a mimicking network was introduced by Hagerup, Katajainen, Nishimura and Ragde (1995) who also exhibited a mimicking network of size $2^{2^{k}}$ for every graph with $k$ terminals. The best known lower bound on the size of a mimicking network is linear in the number of terminals. More precisely, the best known lower bound is $k+1$ for graphs with $k$ terminals (Chaudhuri et al. 2000). In this work, we improve both the upper and lower bounds reducing the doubly-exponential gap between them to a single-exponential gap. Specifically, we obtain the following upper and lower bounds on mimicking networks: 1) Given a graph $G$, we exhibit a construction of mimicking network with at most $(|K|-1)$&#39;th Dedekind number ($\approx 2^{{(k-1)} \choose {\lfloor {{(k-1)}/2} \rfloor}}$) of vertices (independent of size of $V$). Furthermore, we show that the construction is optimal among all {\it restricted mimicking networks} -- a natural class of mimicking networks that are obtained by clustering vertices together. 2) There exists graphs with $k$ terminals that have no mimicking network of size smaller than $2^{\frac{k-1}{2}}$. We also exhibit improved constructions of mimicking networks for trees and graphs of bounded tree-width.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Approximating CSPs with Global Cardinality Constraints Using SDP Hierarchies

This work is concerned with approximating constraint satisfaction problems (CSPs) with an additional global cardinality constraints. For example, \maxcut is a boolean CSP where the input is a graph $G = (V,E)$ and the goal is to find a cut $S \cup \bar S = V$ that maximizes the numberof crossing edges, $|E(S,\bar S)|$. The \maxbisection problem is a variant of \maxcut with an additional global constraint that each side of the cut has exactly half the vertices, i.e., $|S| = |V|/2$. Several other natural optimization problems like \minbisection and approximating Graph Expansion can be formulated as CSPs with global constraints. In this work, we formulate a general approach towards approximating CSPs with global constraints using SDP hierarchies. To demonstrate the approach we present the following results: Using the Lasserre hierarchy, we present an algorithm that runs in time $O(n^{poly(1/ε)})$ that given an instance of \maxbisection with value $1-ε$, finds a bisection with value $1-O(\sqrtε)$. This approximation is near-optimal (up to constant factors in $O()$) under the Unique Games Conjecture. By a computer-assisted proof, we show that the same algorithm also achieves a 0.85-approximation for \maxbisection, improving on the previous bound of 0.70 (note that it is \uniquegames hard to approximate better than a 0.878 factor). The same algorithm also yields a 0.92-approximation for \maxtwosat with cardinality constraints. For every CSP with a global cardinality constraints, we present a generic conversion from integrality gap instances for the Lasserre hierarchy to a {\it dictatorship test} whose soundness is at most integrality gap. Dictatorship testing gadgets are central to hardness results for CSPs, and a generic conversion of the above nature lies at the core of the tight Unique Games based hardness result for CSPs. \cite{Raghavendra08}

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Rounding Semidefinite Programming Hierarchies via Global Correlation

We show a new way to round vector solutions of semidefinite programming (SDP) hierarchies into integral solutions, based on a connection between these hierarchies and the spectrum of the input graph. We demonstrate the utility of our method by providing a new SDP-hierarchy based algorithm for constraint satisfaction problems with 2-variable constraints (2-CSP&#39;s). More concretely, we show for every 2-CSP instance I a rounding algorithm for r rounds of the Lasserre SDP hierarchy for I that obtains an integral solution that is at most \eps worse than the relaxation&#39;s value (normalized to lie in [0,1]), as long as r > k\cdot\rank_{\geq θ}(\Ins)/\poly(\e) \;, where k is the alphabet size of I, $θ=\poly(\e/k)$, and $\rank_{\geq θ}(\Ins)$ denotes the number of eigenvalues larger than $θ$ in the normalized adjacency matrix of the constraint graph of $\Ins$. In the case that $\Ins$ is a \uniquegames instance, the threshold $θ$ is only a polynomial in $\e$, and is independent of the alphabet size. Also in this case, we can give a non-trivial bound on the number of rounds for \emph{every} instance. In particular our result yields an SDP-hierarchy based algorithm that matches the performance of the recent subexponential algorithm of Arora, Barak and Steurer (FOCS 2010) in the worst case, but runs faster on a natural family of instances, thus further restricting the set of possible hard instances for Khot&#39;s Unique Games Conjecture. Our algorithm actually requires less than the $n^{O(r)}$ constraints specified by the $r^{th}$ level of the Lasserre hierarchy, and in some cases $r$ rounds of our program can be evaluated in time $2^{O(r)}\poly(n)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Testing Odd-Cycle-Freeness in Boolean Functions

Call a function f : F_2^n -> {0,1} odd-cycle-free if there are no x_1, ..., x_k in F_2^n with k an odd integer such that f(x_1) = ... = f(x_k) = 1 and x_1 + ... + x_k = 0. We show that one can distinguish odd-cycle-free functions from those eps-far from being odd-cycle-free by making poly(1/eps) queries to an evaluation oracle. To obtain this result, we use connections between basic Fourier analysis and spectral graph theory to show that one can reduce testing odd-cycle-freeness of Boolean functions to testing bipartiteness of dense graphs. Our work forms part of a recent sequence of works that shows connections between testability of properties of Boolean functions and of graph properties. We also prove that there is a canonical tester for odd-cycle-freeness making poly(1/eps) queries, meaning that the testing algorithm operates by picking a random linear subspace of dimension O(log 1/eps) and then checking if the restriction of the function to the subspace is odd-cycle-free or not. The test is analyzed by studying the effect of random subspace restriction on the Fourier coefficients of a function. Our work implies that testing odd-cycle-freeness using a canonical tester instead of an arbitrary tester incurs no more than a polynomial blowup in the query complexity. The question of whether a canonical tester with polynomial blowup exists for all linear-invariant properties remains an open problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Agnostic Learning of Monomials by Halfspaces is Hard

We prove the following strong hardness result for learning: Given a distribution of labeled examples from the hypercube such that there exists a monomial consistent with $(1-\eps)$ of the examples, it is NP-hard to find a halfspace that is correct on $(1/2+\eps)$ of the examples, for arbitrary constants $\eps > 0$. In learning theory terms, weak agnostic learning of monomials is hard, even if one is allowed to output a hypothesis from the much bigger concept class of halfspaces. This hardness result subsumes a long line of previous results, including two recent hardness results for the proper learning of monomials and halfspaces. As an immediate corollary of our result we show that weak agnostic learning of decision lists is NP-hard. Our techniques are quite different from previous hardness proofs for learning. We define distributions on positive and negative examples for monomials whose first few moments match. We use the invariance principle to argue that regular halfspaces (all of whose coefficients have small absolute value relative to the total $\ell_2$ norm) cannot distinguish between distributions whose first few moments match. For highly non-regular subspaces, we use a structural lemma from recent work on fooling halfspaces to argue that they are ``junta-like&#39;&#39; and one can zero out all but the top few coefficients without affecting the performance of the halfspace. The top few coefficients form the natural list decoding of a halfspace in the context of dictatorship tests/Label Cover reductions. We note that unlike previous invariance principle based proofs which are only known to give Unique-Games hardness, we are able to reduce from a version of Label Cover problem that is known to be NP-hard. This has inspired follow-up work on bypassing the Unique Games conjecture in some optimal geometric inapproximability results.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Reductions Between Expansion Problems

The Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis (Raghavendra, Steurer, STOC 2010) is a natural hardness assumption concerning the problem of approximating the edge expansion of small sets in graphs. This hardness assumption is closely connected to the Unique Games Conjecture (Khot, STOC 2002). In particular, the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis implies the Unique Games Conjecture (Raghavendra, Steurer, STOC 2010). Our main result is that the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis is in fact equivalent to a variant of the Unique Games Conjecture. More precisely, the hypothesis is equivalent to the Unique Games Conjecture restricted to instance with a fairly mild condition on the expansion of small sets. Alongside, we obtain the first strong hardness of approximation results for the Balanced Separator and Minimum Linear Arrangement problems. Before, no such hardness was known for these problems even assuming the Unique Games Conjecture. These results not only establish the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis as a natural unifying hypothesis that implies the Unique Games Conjecture, all its consequences and, in addition, hardness results for other problems like Balanced Separator and Minimum Linear Arrangement, but our results also show that the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis problem lies at the combinatorial heart of the Unique Games Conjecture. The key technical ingredient is a new way of exploiting the structure of the Unique Games instances obtained from the Small-Set Expansion Hypothesis via (Raghavendra, Steurer, 2010). This additional structure allows us to modify standard reductions in a way that essentially destroys their local-gadget nature. Using this modification, we can argue about the expansion in the graphs produced by the reduction without relying on expansion properties of the underlying Unique Games instance (which would be impossible for a local-gadget reduction).

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access