Paper detail

Many Sparse Cuts via Higher Eigenvalues

Cheeger's fundamental inequality states that any edge-weighted graph has a vertex subset $S$ such that its expansion (a.k.a. conductance) is bounded as follows: \[ ϕ(S) \defeq \frac{w(S,\bar{S})}{\min \set{w(S), w(\bar{S})}} \leq 2\sqrt{λ_2} \] where $w$ is the total edge weight of a subset or a cut and $λ_2$ is the second smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian of the graph. Here we prove the following natural generalization: for any integer $k \in [n]$, there exist $ck$ disjoint subsets $S_1, ..., S_{ck}$, such that \[ \max_i ϕ(S_i) \leq C \sqrt{λ_{k} \log k} \] where $λ_i$ is the $i^{th}$ smallest eigenvalue of the normalized Laplacian and $c<1,C>0$ are suitable absolute constants. Our proof is via a polynomial-time algorithm to find such subsets, consisting of a spectral projection and a randomized rounding. As a consequence, we get the same upper bound for the small set expansion problem, namely for any $k$, there is a subset $S$ whose weight is at most a $\bigO(1/k)$ fraction of the total weight and $ϕ(S) \le C \sqrt{λ_k \log k}$. Both results are the best possible up to constant factors. The underlying algorithmic problem, namely finding $k$ subsets such that the maximum expansion is minimized, besides extending sparse cuts to more than one subset, appears to be a natural clustering problem in its own right.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.