BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Peter J. Diggle

Peter J. Diggle contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ComputationApplicationsMethodology

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
3topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2013arXiv

Combining data from multiple spatially referenced prevalence surveys using generalized linear geostatistical models

Data from multiple prevalence surveys can provide information on common parameters of interest, which can therefore be estimated more precisely in a joint analysis than by separate analyses of the data from each survey. However, fitting a single model to the combined data from multiple surveys is inadvisable without testing the implicit assumption that all of the surveys are directed at the same inferential target. In this paper we propose a multivariate generalized linear geostatistical model that accommodates two sources of heterogeneity across surveys so as to correct for spatially structured bias in non-randomised surveys and to allow for temporal variation in the underlying prevalence surface between consecutive survey-periods. We describe a Monte Carlo maximum likelihood procedure for parameter estimation, and show through simulation experiments how accounting for the different sources of heterogeneity among surveys in a joint model leads to more precise inferences. We describe an application to multiple surveys of malaria prevalence conducted in Chikhwawa District, Southern Malawi, and discuss how this approach could inform hybrid sampling strategies that combine data from randomised and non-randomised surveys so as to make the most efficient use of all available data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Spatial and Spatio-Temporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes: Extending the Geostatistical Paradigm

In this paper we first describe the class of log-Gaussian Cox processes (LGCPs) as models for spatial and spatio-temporal point process data. We discuss inference, with a particular focus on the computational challenges of likelihood-based inference. We then demonstrate the usefulness of the LGCP by describing four applications: estimating the intensity surface of a spatial point process; investigating spatial segregation in a multi-type process; constructing spatially continuous maps of disease risk from spatially discrete data; and real-time health surveillance. We argue that problems of this kind fit naturally into the realm of geostatistics, which traditionally is defined as the study of spatially continuous processes using spatially discrete observations at a finite number of locations. We suggest that a more useful definition of geostatistics is by the class of scientific problems that it addresses, rather than by particular models or data formats.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

INLA or MCMC? A Tutorial and Comparative Evaluation for Spatial Prediction in log-Gaussian Cox Processes

We investigate two options for performing Bayesian inference on spatial log-Gaussian Cox processes assuming a spatially continuous latent field: Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) and the integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA). We first describe the device of approximating a spatially continuous Gaussian field by a Gaussian Markov random field on a discrete lattice, and present a simulation study showing that, with careful choice of parameter values, small neighbourhood sizes can give excellent approximations. We then introduce the spatial log-Gaussian Cox process and describe MCMC and INLA methods for spatial prediction within this model class. We report the results of a simulation study in which we compare MALA and the technique of approximating the continuous latent field by a discrete one, followed by approximate Bayesian inference via INLA over a selection of 18 simulated scenarios. The results question the notion that the latter technique is both significantly faster and more robust than MCMC in this setting; 100,000 iterations of the MALA algorithm running in 20 minutes on a desktop PC delivered greater predictive accuracy than the default \verb=INLA= strategy, which ran in 4 minutes and gave comparative performance to the full Laplace approximation which ran in 39 minutes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

lgcp An R Package for Inference with Spatio-Temporal Log-Gaussian Cox Processes

This paper introduces an R package for spatio-temporal prediction and forecasting for log-Gaussian Cox processes. The main computational tool for these models is Markov chain Monte Carlo and the new package, lgcp, therefore also provides an extensible suite of functions for implementing MCMC algorithms for processes of this type. The modelling framework and details of inferential procedures are first presented before a tour of lgcp functionality is given via a walk-through data-analysis. Topics covered include reading in and converting data, estimation of the key components and parameters of the model, specifying output and simulation quantities, computation of Monte Carlo expectations, post-processing and simulation of data sets.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access