BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Emanuele Giorgi

Emanuele Giorgi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
ApplicationsComputationmath.STMethodologyStatistics Theory

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2020arXiv

Understanding the effects of dichotomization of continuous outcomes on geostatistical inference

Diagnosis is often based on the exceedance or not of continuous health indicators of a predefined cut-off value, so as to classify patients into positives and negatives for the disease under investigation. In this paper, we investigate the effects of dichotomization of spatially-referenced continuous outcome variables on geostatistical inference. Although this issue has been extensively studied in other fields, dichotomization is still a common practice in epidemiological studies. Furthermore, the effects of this practice in the context of prevalence mapping have not been fully understood. Here, we demonstrate how spatial correlation affects the loss of information due to dichotomization, how linear geostatistical models can be used to map disease prevalence and thus avoid dichotomization, and finally, how dichotomization affects our predictive inference on prevalence. To pursue these objectives, we develop a metric, based on the composite likelihood, which can be used to quantify the potential loss of information after dichotomization without requiring the fitting of Binomial geostatistical models. Through a simulation study and two applications on disease mapping in Africa, we show that, as thresholds used for dichotomization move further away from the mean of the underlying process, the performance of binomial geostatistical models deteriorates substantially. We also find that dichotomization can lead to the loss of fine scale features of disease prevalence and increased uncertainty in the parameter estimates, especially in the presence of a large noise to signal ratio. These findings strongly support the conclusions from previous studies that dichotomization should be always avoided whenever feasible.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On the Computation of Multivariate Scenario Sets for the Skew-t and Generalized Hyperbolic Families

We examine the problem of computing multivariate scenarios sets for skewed distributions. Our interest is motivated by the potential use of such sets in the "stress testing" of insurance companies and banks whose solvency is dependent on changes in a set of financial "risk factors". We define multivariate scenario sets based on the notion of half-space depth (HD) and also introduce the notion of expectile depth (ED) where half-spaces are defined by expectiles rather than quantiles. We then use the HD and ED functions to define convex scenario sets that generalize the concepts of quantile and expectile to higher dimensions. In the case of elliptical distributions these sets coincide with the regions encompassed by the contours of the density function. In the context of multivariate skewed distributions, the equivalence of depth contours and density contours does not hold in general. We consider two parametric families that account for skewness and heavy tails: the generalized hyperbolic and the skew-t distributions. By making use of a canonical form representation, where skewness is completely absorbed by one component, we show that the HD contours of these distributions are "near-elliptical" and, in the case of the skew-Cauchy distribution, we prove that the HD contours are exactly elliptical. We propose a measure of multivariate skewness as a deviation from angular symmetry and show that it can explain the quality of the elliptical approximation for the HD contours.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

On The Inverse Geostatistical Problem of Inference on Missing Locations

The standard geostatistical problem is to predict the values of a spatially continuous phenomenon, $S(x)$ say, at locations $x$ using data $(y_i,x_i):i=1,..,n$ where $y_i$ is the realization at location $x_i$ of $S(x_i)$, or of a random variable $Y_i$ that is stochastically related to $S(x_i)$. In this paper we address the inverse problem of predicting the locations of observed measurements $y$. We discuss how knowledge of the sampling mechanism can and should inform a prior specification, $π(x)$ say, for the joint distribution of the measurement locations $X = \{x_i: i=1,...,n\}$, and propose an efficient Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for drawing samples from the resulting predictive distribution of the missing elements of $X$. An important feature in many applied settings is that this predictive distribution is multi-modal, which severely limits the usefulness of simple summary measures such as the mean or median. We present two simulated examples to demonstrate the importance of the specification for $π(x)$, and analyze rainfall data from Paraná State, Brazil to show how, under additional assumptions, an empirical of estimate of $π(x)$ can be used when no prior information on the sampling design is available.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Combining data from multiple spatially referenced prevalence surveys using generalized linear geostatistical models

Data from multiple prevalence surveys can provide information on common parameters of interest, which can therefore be estimated more precisely in a joint analysis than by separate analyses of the data from each survey. However, fitting a single model to the combined data from multiple surveys is inadvisable without testing the implicit assumption that all of the surveys are directed at the same inferential target. In this paper we propose a multivariate generalized linear geostatistical model that accommodates two sources of heterogeneity across surveys so as to correct for spatially structured bias in non-randomised surveys and to allow for temporal variation in the underlying prevalence surface between consecutive survey-periods. We describe a Monte Carlo maximum likelihood procedure for parameter estimation, and show through simulation experiments how accounting for the different sources of heterogeneity among surveys in a joint model leads to more precise inferences. We describe an application to multiple surveys of malaria prevalence conducted in Chikhwawa District, Southern Malawi, and discuss how this approach could inform hybrid sampling strategies that combine data from randomised and non-randomised surveys so as to make the most efficient use of all available data.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access