Paper detail

On The Inverse Geostatistical Problem of Inference on Missing Locations

The standard geostatistical problem is to predict the values of a spatially continuous phenomenon, $S(x)$ say, at locations $x$ using data $(y_i,x_i):i=1,..,n$ where $y_i$ is the realization at location $x_i$ of $S(x_i)$, or of a random variable $Y_i$ that is stochastically related to $S(x_i)$. In this paper we address the inverse problem of predicting the locations of observed measurements $y$. We discuss how knowledge of the sampling mechanism can and should inform a prior specification, $π(x)$ say, for the joint distribution of the measurement locations $X = \{x_i: i=1,...,n\}$, and propose an efficient Metropolis-Hastings algorithm for drawing samples from the resulting predictive distribution of the missing elements of $X$. An important feature in many applied settings is that this predictive distribution is multi-modal, which severely limits the usefulness of simple summary measures such as the mean or median. We present two simulated examples to demonstrate the importance of the specification for $π(x)$, and analyze rainfall data from Paraná State, Brazil to show how, under additional assumptions, an empirical of estimate of $π(x)$ can be used when no prior information on the sampling design is available.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.