Source author record

Michael G. Chipeta

Michael G. Chipeta appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Inhibitory geostatistical designs for spatial prediction taking account of uncertain covariance structure

The problem of choosing spatial sampling designs for investigating unobserved spatial phenomenon S arises in many contexts, for example in identifying households to select for a prevalence survey to study disease burden and heterogeneity in a study region D. We studied randomised inhibitory spatial sampling designs to address the problem of spatial prediction whilst taking account of the need to estimate covariance structure. Two specific classes of design are inhibitory designs and inhibitory designs plus close pairs. In an inhibitory design, any pair of sample locations must be separated by at least an inhibition distance {$δ$}. In an inhibitory plus close pairs design, n - k sample locations in an inhibitory design with inhibition distance {$δ$} are augmented by k locations each positioned close to one of the randomly selected n - k locations in the inhibitory design, uniformly distributed within a disc of radius {$ζ$}. We present simulation results for the Matern class of covariance structures. When the nugget variance is non-negligible, inhibitory plus close pairs designs demonstrate improved predictive efficiency over designs without close pairs. We illustrate how these findings can be applied to the design of a rolling Malaria Indicator Survey that forms part of an ongoing large-scale, five-year malaria transmission reduction project in Malawi.

preprint2015arXiv

Adaptive Geostatistical Design and Analysis for Sequential Prevalence Surveys

Non-adaptive geostatistical designs (NAGD) offer standard ways of collecting and analysing geostatistical data in which sampling locations are fixed in advance of any data collection. In contrast, adaptive geostatistical designs (AGD) allow collection of exposure and outcome data over time to depend on information obtained from previous information to optimise data collection towards the analysis objective. AGDs are becoming more important in spatial mapping, particularly in poor resource settings where uniformly precise mapping may be unrealistically costly and priority is often to identify critical areas where interventions can have the most health impact. Two constructions are: $singleton$ and $batch$ adaptive sampling. In singleton sampling, locations $x_i$ are chosen sequentially and at each stage, $x_{k+1}$ depends on data obtained at locations $x_1,\ldots , x_k$. In batch sampling, locations are chosen in batches of size $b > 1$, allowing new batch, $\{x_{(k+1)},\ldots ,x_{(k+b)}\}$, to depend on data obtained at locations $x_1,\ldots, x_{kb}$. In most settings, batch sampling is more realistic than singleton sampling. We propose specific batch AGDs and assess their efficiency relative to their singleton adaptive and non-adaptive counterparts by using simulations. We show how we apply these findings to inform an AGD of a rolling Malaria Indicator Survey, part of a large-scale, five-year malaria transmission reduction project in Malawi.