BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

N. G. Uraltsev

N. G. Uraltsev contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
hep-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
13works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

13 published item(s)

preprint1997arXiv

Key Distributions for Charmless Semileptonic B Decay

We present theoretical predictions for a few phenomenologically interesting distributions in the semileptonic b->u decays which are affected by Fermi motion. The perturbative effects are incorporated at the one-loop level and appear to be very moderate. Our treatment of Fermi motion is based directly on QCD, being encoded in the universal distribution function F(x). The decay distributions in the charged lepton energy, invariant mass of hadrons, hadron energy, and q^2 are given. We note that typically about 90% of all decay events are expected to have M_X < M_D; this feature can be exploited in determination of |V_ub|.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

A Closer Look at Perturbative Corrections in the b->c Semileptonic Transitions

We comment on two recent calculations of the second order perturbative corrections in the heavy flavor semileptonic transitions within the Brodsky-Lepage-Mackenzie approach. It is pointed out that the results do not show significant enhancement either in the inclusive $b\rightarrow c$ decays or in the exclusive amplitudes at zero recoil provided that the expansion parameter is chosen in a way appropriate to the kinematics at hand. The values of the second-order coefficients inferred from the BLM-type calculations appear to be of order unity in the both cases. Thus, in both cases no significant uncertainty in extracting $V_{cb}$ can be attributed to perturbative effects. The theoretical accuracy is mostly determined by the existing uncertainty in $1/m_c^2$ nonperturbative corrections in the exclusive $B\rightarrow D^*$ amplitude, and, to a lesser extent, by the uncertainty in the estimated value of the kinetic energy matrix element $μ_π^2$ in the case of $Γ_{\rm sl}(b\rightarrow c)$. The theoretical accuracy of the inclusive method of determination of $V_{cb}$ seemingly competes with and even exceeds the experimental accuracy.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

b -> s +γ: A QCD Consistent Analysis of the Photon Energy Distribution

The photon energy distribution in the inclusive b -> s+γtransitions is a combination of two components: the first component, soft physics, is determined by the so called primordial distribution function, while the second component, perturbative physics, is governed by the hard gluon emission. A simple ansatz is suggested for the primordial distribution function which obeys the QCD constraints known so far. We then discuss in detail how the hard gluon emission affects the energy distribution. An extension of the Sudakov approximation is worked out incorporating the Brodsky-Lepage-Mackenzie prescription and its generalizations. We explicitly calculate the marriage of nonperturbative with perturbative effects in the way required by OPE, introducing separation scale μ. A few parameters, such as m_b and μ_π^2 affect the shape of the distribution and, thus, can be determined by matching to the experimental data. The data, still scarce, while not giving precise values for these parameters, yield consistency with theory: the current values of the above parameters lie within experimental uncertainty. On the theoretical side we outline a method allowing one to go beyond the practical version of OPE.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Do Higher Order Perturbative Corrections Upset |V_{cb}| and |V_{ub}| Determined from Semileptonic Widths?

It is shown that large perturbative corrections found previously for semileptonic beauty and charm decays are associated with using inappropriate pole masses. The latter, in the perturbative expansion, suffer from the 1/m_Q infrared renormalon which is absent in the widths, which leads to similar large corrections in m_Q. Pole masses are neither measured directly in experiment. If the widths are related to parameters determined in experiment, the overall impact of the calculated second order corrections becomes strongly suppressed and leads to less than 1\% change in |V_{cb}| and |V_{ub}|. Even in charm decays the perturbative corrections appear to be very moderate in the consistent OPE-compliant treatment. The updated estimate of |V_{cb}| is given, based on recent accurate determination of m_b and α_s(1 GeV). The theoretical accuracy of determination of |V_{ub}| from Γ_{sl}(b->u) appears to be good as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1994arXiv

$|V_{cb}|$ from OPE Sum Rules for Heavy Flavor Transitions

We derive a model-independent upper bound for the axial-vector form factor of the $B\ra D^*$ transition at zero recoil, $F_{B\ra D^*}$. The form factor turns out to be noticeably less than unity. The deviation of $F_{B\ra D^*}$ from unity is larger than previously anticipated. Using our estimate we extract $|V_{cb}|$ from the measured exclusive rate of $B\ra D^* lν$ extrapolated to the point of zero recoil. The central `` exclusive&#34; value of $|V_{cb}|$ is in agreement with the value obtained from the inclusive semileptonic width $Γ(B\ra X_c lν)$. We argue that the theoretical uncertainty in determining $|V_{cb}|$ from the total inclusive width is significantly reduced if a constraint on the quark mass difference $m_b - m_c$ stemming from the heavy quark expansion is taken into account.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1994arXiv

Comment on the Renormalization Group Improvement in Exclusive $b\ra c $ Transitions

Using rather general consideration I argue that the numerical impact of the existing next-to-leading logarithmic summations of terms $\log{m_b/m_c}$ for perturbative factors $η_A$, $η_V$ in the exclusive zero recoil semileptonic transitions is irrelevant, and adopting corresponding corrections beyond the exact one loop result for both estimating the values of these formfactors and their theoretical uncertainty, is misleading. The central theoretical value if taken literally is then $η_A\simeq 0.97$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1994arXiv

Sum Rules for Heavy Flavor Transitions in the SV Limit

We show how sum rules for the weak decays of heavy flavor hadrons can be derived as the moments of spectral distributions in the small velocity (SV) limit. This systematic approach allows us to determine corrections to these sum rules, to obtain new sum rules and it provides us with a transparent physical interpretation; it also opens a new perspective on the notion of the heavy quark mass. Applying these sum rules we derive a lower bound on the deviation of the exclusive form factor $F_{B->D^*}$ from unity at zero recoil; likewise we give a field-theoretical derivation of a previously formulated inequality between the expectation value for the kinetic energy operator of the heavy quark and for the chromomagnetic operator. We analyze how the known results on nonperturbative corrections must be understood when one takes into account the normalization point dependence of the low scale parameters. Relation between the field-theoretic derivation of the sum rules and the quantum-mechanical approach is elucidated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1994arXiv

The Pole Mass of The Heavy Quark. Perturbation Theory and Beyond

The key quantity of the heavy quark theory is the quark mass $m_Q$. Since quarks are unobservable one can suggest different definitions of $m_Q$. One of the most popular choices is the pole quark mass routinely used in perturbative calculations and in some analyses based on heavy quark expansions. We show that no precise definition of the pole mass can be given in the full theory once non-perturbative effects are included. Any definition of this quantity suffers from an intrinsic uncertainty of order $\Lam /m_Q$. This fact is succinctly described by the existence of an infrared renormalon generating a factorial divergence in the high-order coefficients of the $α_s$ series; the corresponding singularity in the Borel plane is situated at $2π/b$. A peculiar feature is that this renormalon is not associated with the matrix element of a local operator. The difference $\La \equiv M_{H_Q}-m_Q^{pole}$ can still be defined in Heavy Quark Effective Theory, but only at the price of introducing an explicit dependence on a normalization point $μ$: $\La (μ)$. Fortunately the pole mass $m_Q(0)$ {\em per se} does not appear in calculable observable quantities.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

$D_s$ Lifetime, $m_b$, $m_c$ and $|V_{cb}|$ in the Heavy Quark Expansion

We present some straightforward applications of the QCD heavy quark expansion, stated in previous papers [1-3], to the inclusive widths of heavy flavour hadrons. We address the question of the $D_s$ lifetime and argue that -- barring Weak Annihilation (WA) -- $τ(D_s)$ is expected to exceed $τ(D^0)$ by several percent; on the other hand WA could provide a difference of up to $10\div20\%$ of {\it any} sign. We extract $m_c$, $m_b$ and $|V_{cb}|$ from $Γ\ind{SL}(D^+)$ and $Γ\ind{SL}(B)$. The values of the quark masses are somewhat higher, but compatible with estimates from QCD sum rules; we obtain $|V_{cb}|\simeq 0.043$ for $τ(B)=1.4$ psec and $BR_{SL}(B)=10.5$\% . We discuss the associated uncertainties in the $1/m_Q$ expansion as well as some consequences for other electroweak decays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

Anathematizing the Guralnik and Manohar Inequality for \barΛ

There is a recent claim by Guralnik and Manohar \cite{GM} to have established a rigorous lower bound on $\bar Λ$, the asymptotic difference between the mass of a heavy flavour {\em hadron} and that of the heavy flavour {\em quark}. We point out the flaw in their reasoning and discuss the underlying physical problem. An explicit counterexample to the GM bound is given; one can therefore not count on a refined proof to re-establish this bound. *********** Uses LaTeX No figures No macros file used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1993arXiv

QCD Predictions for Lepton Spectra in Inclusive Heavy Flavour Decays

We derive the lepton spectrum in semileptonic beauty decays from a nonperturbative treatment of QCD; it is based on an expansion in $1/m_Q$ with $m_Q$ being the heavy flavour quark mass. The leading corrections arising on the $1/m_Q$ level are completely expressed in terms of the difference in the mass of the heavy hadron and the quark. Nontrivial effects appear in $1/m_Q^2$ terms affecting mainly the endpoint region; they are different for meson and baryon decays as well as for beauty and charm decays.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1992arXiv

Nonperturbative Corrections to Inclusive Beauty and Charm Decays: QCD versus Phenomenological Models

We present a selfconsistent method for treating nonperturbative effects in inclusive nonleptonic and semileptonic decays of heavy flavour hadrons. These effects give rise to powerlike corrections $\propto 1/m_Q^n\,$, $n \ge 2$ with $m_Q$ denoting the heavy quark mass.The leading correction to the semileptonic branching ratio occurs for n=2. It is expressed in terms of the vector-pseudoscalar mass splitting: $δBR\ind{sl}/BR\ind{sl} \simeq BR\ind{nl}\, \cdot \,6\,(\,(M_V^2-M_P^2)/m_Q^2)\cdot (c_+^2 - c_-^2)/2N_c$ and yields a {\it reduction} of $BR\ind{sl}$. This nonperturbative correction contributes to the nonleptonic width with a sign opposite to that of the perturbative terms that are non-leading in $1/N_c$. In beauty decays the former reduces the latter by 20 \% whereas in charm decays they more or less cancel. This leads to a {\it reduction} of $BR\ind{sl}$ by no more than 10 \% in beauty decays and by a factor of roughly two in charm decays. We confront these results with those obtained from phenomenological models of heavy flavour decays and find that such models are unable to mimic these leading corrections by a specific choice of quark masses or by invoking Fermi motion.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access