Paper detail

Do Higher Order Perturbative Corrections Upset |V_{cb}| and |V_{ub}| Determined from Semileptonic Widths?

It is shown that large perturbative corrections found previously for semileptonic beauty and charm decays are associated with using inappropriate pole masses. The latter, in the perturbative expansion, suffer from the 1/m_Q infrared renormalon which is absent in the widths, which leads to similar large corrections in m_Q. Pole masses are neither measured directly in experiment. If the widths are related to parameters determined in experiment, the overall impact of the calculated second order corrections becomes strongly suppressed and leads to less than 1\% change in |V_{cb}| and |V_{ub}|. Even in charm decays the perturbative corrections appear to be very moderate in the consistent OPE-compliant treatment. The updated estimate of |V_{cb}| is given, based on recent accurate determination of m_b and α_s(1 GeV). The theoretical accuracy of determination of |V_{ub}| from Γ_{sl}(b->u) appears to be good as well.

preprint1995arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.