Source author record

A. I. Vainshtein

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

4works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

4 publications

preprint1994arXiv

The Pole Mass of The Heavy Quark. Perturbation Theory and Beyond

The key quantity of the heavy quark theory is the quark mass mQm_Q. Since quarks are unobservable one can suggest different definitions of mQm_Q. One of the most popular choices is the pole quark mass routinely used in perturbative calculations and in some analyses based on heavy quark expansions. We show that no precise definition of the pole mass can be given in the full theory once non-perturbative effects are included. Any definition of this quantity suffers from an intrinsic uncertainty of order $\Lam /m_Q$. This fact is succinctly described by the existence of an infrared renormalon generating a factorial divergence in the high-order coefficients of the αsα_s series; the corresponding singularity in the Borel plane is situated at 2π/b2π/b. A peculiar feature is that this renormalon is not associated with the matrix element of a local operator. The difference $\La \equiv M_{H_Q}-m_Q^{pole}$ can still be defined in Heavy Quark Effective Theory, but only at the price of introducing an explicit dependence on a normalization point μμ: $\La (μ)$. Fortunately the pole mass mQ(0)m_Q(0) {\em per se} does not appear in calculable observable quantities.

preprint1992arXiv

Nonperturbative Corrections to Inclusive Beauty and Charm Decays: QCD versus Phenomenological Models

We present a selfconsistent method for treating nonperturbative effects in inclusive nonleptonic and semileptonic decays of heavy flavour hadrons. These effects give rise to powerlike corrections ∝1/mQn \propto 1/m_Q^n\,, n≥2n \ge 2 with mQm_Q denoting the heavy quark mass.The leading correction to the semileptonic branching ratio occurs for n=2. It is expressed in terms of the vector-pseudoscalar mass splitting: $δBR\ind{sl}/BR\ind{sl} \simeq BR\ind{nl}\, \cdot \,6\,(\,(M_V^2-M_P^2)/m_Q^2)\cdot (c_+^2 - c_-^2)/2N_c$ and yields a {\it reduction} of $BR\ind{sl}$. This nonperturbative correction contributes to the nonleptonic width with a sign opposite to that of the perturbative terms that are non-leading in 1/Nc1/N_c. In beauty decays the former reduces the latter by 20 \% whereas in charm decays they more or less cancel. This leads to a {\it reduction} of $BR\ind{sl}$ by no more than 10 \% in beauty decays and by a factor of roughly two in charm decays. We confront these results with those obtained from phenomenological models of heavy flavour decays and find that such models are unable to mimic these leading corrections by a specific choice of quark masses or by invoking Fermi motion.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.