Researcher profile

I. I. Bigi

I. I. Bigi contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Probing violation of CP & T invariance in the transitions of τ leptons

The SM predicts zero value for {\bf CP} \& {\bf T} violation in the decays of $τ$ leptons -- except $τ^- \to νK_S [π^-/π^-π^0 ...]$. Our community could establish impact of New Dynamics (ND) in a {\bf CP} asymmetry in a semi-hadronic $τ$ transition and later in a second one. To be `practical', I suggest to our experimental colleagues to probe $τ^- \to ν\bar K^0 [π^-/π^-π^0/π^-η]$and $τ^- \to νK^-[π^0/π^+π^-/η]$. While I had mostly given comments about {\bf CP} violation in $τ$ transitions, some theorists have shown how ND models could produce {\bf CP} asymmetries; I will discuss these ones, although sometimes I am not a true theorist, but as a phenomenalist here. I can hardly `dream' that {\bf CP} asymmetry in $τ$ decays could connected with our huge asymmetry in `our' matter vs. anti-matter.

preprint2020arXiv

2019/20 Lessons from $τ(Ω_c^0)$ \& $τ(Ξ_c^0)$ and {\bf CP} asymmetry in charm decays

Our 2003 "Cicerone" had discussed charm dynamics with different directions and levels \cite{CICERONE}. Here we focus on two items, where the `landscape' has changed sizably. (A) The lifetimes \& semi-leptonic decays of charm hadrons show the impact of non-perturbative QCD and to which degree one can apply Heavy Quark Expansion (HQE) for charm hadrons. It is more complex as we have learnt from 2019/20 data. (B) {\bf CP} asymmetry has been established in 2019 \cite{LHCbGuy}: $ΔA_{\bf CP} \equiv A_{\bf CP}(D^0 \to K^+K^-) - A_{\bf CP}(D^0 \to π^+π^-) $=$\, -\, (1.54 \pm 0.29 ) \cdot 10^{-3}$ is quite an achievement by the LHCb collaboration! Our community is at the beginning of a long travel for fundamental dynamics. Can the SM account for these? We discuss the assumptions that were made up to 2018 data and new conclusions from 2019/20 ones. We need more data; however, one has to discuss correlations between different transitions. We give an {\bf Appendix} what we have learnt for large {\bf CP} asymmetry in $K_L \to π^+π^-e^+e^-$.