Source author record

Maurice Chiodo

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
3topics
4close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2021arXiv

A Hippocratic Oath for mathematicians? Mapping the landscape of ethics in mathematics

While the consequences of mathematically-based software, algorithms and strategies have become ever wider and better appreciated, ethical reflection on mathematics has remained primitive. We review the somewhat disconnected suggestions of commentators in recent decades with a view to piecing together a coherent approach to ethics in mathematics. Calls for a Hippocratic Oath for mathematicians are examined and it is concluded that while lessons can be learned from the medical profession, the relation of mathematicians to those affected by their work is significantly different. There is something to be learned also from the codes of conduct of cognate but professionalised quantitative disciplines such as engineering and accountancy, as well as from legal principles bearing on professional work. We conclude with recommendations that professional societies in mathematics should sponsor an (international) code of ethics, institutional mission statements for mathematicians and syllabuses for incorporation into mathematics degrees.

preprint2016arXiv

XX-torsion and universal groups

For a set X⊆NX\subseteq \mathbb{N}, we define the XX-torsion of a group GG to be all elements g∈Gg\in G with gn=eg^{n}=e for some n∈Xn\in X. With XX recursively enumerable, we give two independent proofs (group-theoretic, and model-theoretic) that there exists a universal finitely presented XX-torsion-free group; one which contains all finitely presented XX-torsion-free groups. We also show that, if XX is recursively enumerable, then the set of finite presentations of XX-torsion-free groups is Π20Π_{2}^{0}-complete in Kleene's arithmetic hierarchy.

preprint2016arXiv

On torsion in finitely presented groups

We give a uniform construction that, on input of a recursive presentation PP of a group, outputs a recursive presentation of a torsion-free group, isomorphic to PP whenever PP is itself torsion-free. We use this to re-obtain a known result, the existence of a universal finitely presented torsion-free group; one into which all finitely presented torsion-free groups embed. We apply our techniques to show that recognising embeddability of finitely presented groups is Π20Π^{0}_{2}-hard, Σ20Σ^{0}_{2}-hard, and lies in Σ30Σ^{0}_{3}. We also show that the sets of orders of torsion elements of finitely presented groups are precisely the Σ20Σ^{0}_{2} sets which are closed under taking factors.

preprint2016arXiv

Transversals as generating sets in finitely generated groups

We explore transversals of finite index subgroups of finitely generated groups. We show that when HH is a subgroup of a rank nn group GG and HH has index at least nn in GG then we can construct a left transversal for HH which contains a generating set of size nn for GG, and that the construction is algorithmic when GG is finitely presented. We also show that, in the case where GG has rank n≤3n \leq3, there is a simultaneous left-right transversal for HH which contains a generating set of size nn for GG. We finish by showing that if HH is a subgroup of a rank nn group GG with index less than 3⋅2n−13 \cdot 2^{n-1}, and HH contains no primitive elements of GG, then HH is normal in GG and G/H≅C2nG/H \cong C_{2}^{n}.

preprint2010arXiv

Finding non-trivial elements and splittings in groups

It is well known that the triviality problem for finitely presented groups is unsolvable; we ask the question of whether there exists a general procedure to produce a non-trivial element from a finite presentation of a non-trivial group. If not, then this would resolve an open problem by J. Wiegold: `Is every finitely generated perfect group the normal closure of one element?' We prove a weakened version of our question: there is no general procedure to pick a non-trivial generator from a finite presentation of a non-trivial group. We also show there is neither a general procedure to decompose a finite presentation of a non-trivial free product into two non-trivial finitely presented factors, nor one to construct an embedding from one finitely presented group into another in which it embeds. We apply our results to show that a construction by Stallings on splitting groups with more than one end can never be made algorithmic, nor can the process of splitting connect sums of non-simply connected closed 4-manifolds.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.