BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Matteo Polettini

Matteo Polettini contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MPBiological Physicsmath.FAmath.MG

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
6works
0followers
6topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Mutual Multilinearity of Nonequilibrium Network Currents

Continuous-time Markov chains have been successful in modelling systems across numerous fields, with currents being fundamental entities that describe the flows of energy, particles, individuals, chemical species, information, or other quantities. They apply to systems described by agents transitioning between vertices along the edges of a network (at some rate in each direction). It has recently been shown by the authors that, at stationarity, a hidden linearity exists between currents that flow along edges: if one controls the current of a specific "input" edge (by tuning transition rates along it), any other current is a linear-affine function of the input current [PRL 133, 047401 (2024)]. In this paper, we extend this result to the situation where one controls the currents of several edges, and prove that other currents are in linear-affine relation with the input ones. Two proofs with distinct insights are provided: the first relies on Kirchhoff's current law and reduces the input set inductively through graph analysis, while the second utilizes the resolvent approach via a Laplace transform in time. We obtain explicit expressions for the current-to-current susceptibilities, which allow one to map current dependencies through the network. We also verify from our expression that Kirchhoff's current law is recovered as a limiting case of our mutual linearity. Last, we uncover that susceptibilities can be obtained from fluctuations when the reference system is originally at equilibrium.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

What to learn from a few visible transitions' statistics?

Interpreting partial information collected from systems subject to noise is a key problem across scientific disciplines. Theoretical frameworks often focus on the dynamics of variables that result from coarse-graining the internal states of a physical system. However, most experimental apparatuses can only detect a partial set of transitions, while internal states are inaccessible. Here, we consider an observer who records a time series of occurrences of one or several transitions performed by a system, under the assumption that its underlying dynamics is Markovian. We pose the question of how one can use the transitions' information to make inferences of dynamical, thermodynamical, and biochemical properties. First, elaborating on first-passage time techniques, we derive analytical expressions for the probabilities of consecutive transitions and the time elapsed between them. Second, we derive a lower bound for the entropy production rate that equals the sum of two non-negative contributions, one due to the statistics of transitions and a second due to the statistics of inter-transition times. We also show that when only one current is measured, our estimate still detects irreversibility even in the absence of net currents. We illustrate the developed framework in experimentally-validated biophysical models of kinesin and dynein molecular motors, and in a minimal model for template-directed polymerization. Our results reveal that while entropy production is entailed in the statistics of two successive transitions of the same type, the statistics of two different successive transitions can probe the existence of an underlying disorder in the motion of a molecular motor. Taken all together, our results highlight the power of inference from transition statistics ranging from thermodynamic quantities to network-topology properties of Markov processes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Fluctuation-dissipation supersymmetry

Open systems may be perturbed out of equilibrium states either by subjecting them to nonconservative forces or by injecting external currents. For small perturbations, the linear response is quantified by two different matrices. In the framework of network thermodynamics, under very broad assumptions, we show that the two matrices are connected by a supersymmetry, predicting that they have the same spectrum - up to the degeneracy of the ground state. Our approach brings into the mathematics of supersymmetry a new ingredient, namely oblique projection operators.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Oblique projections on metric spaces

It is known that complementary oblique projections $\hat{P}_0 + \hat{P}_1 = I$ on a Hilbert space $\mathscr{H}$ have the same standard operator norm $\|\hat{P}_0\| = \|\hat{P}_1\|$ and the same singular values, but for the multiplicity of $0$ and $1$. We generalize these results to Hilbert spaces endowed with a positive-definite metric $G$ on top of the scalar product. Our main result is that the volume elements (pseudodeterminants $\det_+$) of the metrics $L_0,L_1$ induced by $G$ on the complementary oblique subspaces $\mathscr{H} = \mathscr{H}_0 \oplus \mathscr{H}_1$, and of those $\mathitΓ_0,\mathitΓ_1$ induced on their algebraic duals, obey the relations \begin{align} \frac{\det_+ L_1}{\det_+ \mathitΓ_0} = \frac{\det_+ L_0}{\det_+ \mathitΓ_1} = {\det}_+ G. \nonumber \end{align} Furthermore, we break this result down to eigenvalues, proving a "supersymmetry" of the two operators $\sqrt{\mathitΓ_0 L_0}$ and $\sqrt{L_1 \mathitΓ_1}$. We connect the former result to a well-known duality property of the weighted-spanning-tree polynomials in graph theory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sustaining a temperature difference

We derive an expression for the minimal rate of entropy that sustains two reservoirs at different temperatures $T_0$ and $T_\ell$. The law displays an intuitive $\ell^{-1}$ dependency on the relative distance and a characterisic $\log^2 (T_\ell/T_0)$ dependency on the boundary temperatures. First we give a back-of-envelope argument based on the Fourier Law (FL) of conduction, showing that the least-dissipation profile is exponential. Then we revisit a model of a chain of oscillators, each coupled to a heat reservoir. In the limit of large damping we reobtain the exponential and squared-log behaviors, providing a self-consistent derivation of the FL. For small damping "equipartition frustration" leads to a well-known balistic behaviour, whose incompatibility with the FL posed a long-time challenge.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2018arXiv

Effective fluctuation and response theory

The response of thermodynamic systems perturbed out of an equilibrium steady-state is described by the reciprocal and the fluctuation-dissipation relations. The so-called fluctuation theorems extended the study of fluctuations far beyond equilibrium. All these results rely on the crucial assumption that the observer has complete information about the system. Such a precise control is difficult to attain, hence the following questions are compelling: Will an observer who has marginal information be able to perform an effective thermodynamic analysis? Given that such observer will only establish local equilibrium amidst the whirling of hidden degrees of freedom, by perturbing the stalling currents will he/she observe equilibrium-like fluctuations? We model the dynamics of open systems as Markov jump processes on finite networks. We establish that: 1) While marginal currents do not obey a full-fledged fluctuation relation, there exist effective affinities for which an integral fluctuation relation holds; 2) Under reasonable assumptions on the parametrization of the rates, effective and "real" affinities only differ by a constant; 3) At stalling, i.e. where the marginal currents vanish, a symmetrized fluctuation-dissipation relation holds while reciprocity does not; 4) There exists a notion of marginal time-reversal that plays a role akin to that played by time-reversal for complete systems, which restores the fluctuation relation and reciprocity. The above results hold for configuration-space currents, and for phenomenological currents provided that certain symmetries of the effective affinities are respected - a condition whose range of validity we deem the most interesting question left open to future inquiry. Our results are constructive and operational: we provide an explicit expression for the effective affinities and propose a procedure to measure them in laboratory.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access