Paper detail

Of dice and men. Subjective priors, gauge invariance, and nonequilibrium thermodynamics

"Ceci n'est pas une pipe" wrote René Magritte on what was only the representation of a pipe. Phenomena and their physical descriptions differ, and in particular the laws ruling the former might enjoy symmetries that have to be spent to attain the latter. So, inertial frames are necessary to draw numbers out of Newtonian mechanics and confront with experiment, but ultimately the laws of mechanics are independent of reference frames. Generalizing work done in Ref. [M. Polettini, EPL 97 (2012) 30003] to continuous systems, we discuss from a foundational point of view how subjectivity in the choice of reference prior probability is a (gauge) symmetry of thermodynamics. In particular, a change of priors corresponds to a change of coordinates. Employing an approach based on the stochastic thermodynamics of continuous state-space diffusion processes, we discuss the difference between thermostatic and thermodynamic observables and show that, while the quantification of entropy depends on priors, the second law of thermodynamics is formulated in terms of invariant quantities, in particular the curvature of the thermodynamic force (gauge potential), which we calculate in a few examples of processes led by different nonequilibrium mechanisms.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.