Paper detail

Effective fluctuation and response theory

The response of thermodynamic systems perturbed out of an equilibrium steady-state is described by the reciprocal and the fluctuation-dissipation relations. The so-called fluctuation theorems extended the study of fluctuations far beyond equilibrium. All these results rely on the crucial assumption that the observer has complete information about the system. Such a precise control is difficult to attain, hence the following questions are compelling: Will an observer who has marginal information be able to perform an effective thermodynamic analysis? Given that such observer will only establish local equilibrium amidst the whirling of hidden degrees of freedom, by perturbing the stalling currents will he/she observe equilibrium-like fluctuations? We model the dynamics of open systems as Markov jump processes on finite networks. We establish that: 1) While marginal currents do not obey a full-fledged fluctuation relation, there exist effective affinities for which an integral fluctuation relation holds; 2) Under reasonable assumptions on the parametrization of the rates, effective and "real" affinities only differ by a constant; 3) At stalling, i.e. where the marginal currents vanish, a symmetrized fluctuation-dissipation relation holds while reciprocity does not; 4) There exists a notion of marginal time-reversal that plays a role akin to that played by time-reversal for complete systems, which restores the fluctuation relation and reciprocity. The above results hold for configuration-space currents, and for phenomenological currents provided that certain symmetries of the effective affinities are respected - a condition whose range of validity we deem the most interesting question left open to future inquiry. Our results are constructive and operational: we provide an explicit expression for the effective affinities and propose a procedure to measure them in laboratory.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.