Paper detail

What to learn from a few visible transitions' statistics?

Interpreting partial information collected from systems subject to noise is a key problem across scientific disciplines. Theoretical frameworks often focus on the dynamics of variables that result from coarse-graining the internal states of a physical system. However, most experimental apparatuses can only detect a partial set of transitions, while internal states are inaccessible. Here, we consider an observer who records a time series of occurrences of one or several transitions performed by a system, under the assumption that its underlying dynamics is Markovian. We pose the question of how one can use the transitions' information to make inferences of dynamical, thermodynamical, and biochemical properties. First, elaborating on first-passage time techniques, we derive analytical expressions for the probabilities of consecutive transitions and the time elapsed between them. Second, we derive a lower bound for the entropy production rate that equals the sum of two non-negative contributions, one due to the statistics of transitions and a second due to the statistics of inter-transition times. We also show that when only one current is measured, our estimate still detects irreversibility even in the absence of net currents. We illustrate the developed framework in experimentally-validated biophysical models of kinesin and dynein molecular motors, and in a minimal model for template-directed polymerization. Our results reveal that while entropy production is entailed in the statistics of two successive transitions of the same type, the statistics of two different successive transitions can probe the existence of an underlying disorder in the motion of a molecular motor. Taken all together, our results highlight the power of inference from transition statistics ranging from thermodynamic quantities to network-topology properties of Markov processes.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.