BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Masato Hisakado

Masato Hisakado contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
physics.soc-phcond-mat.stat-mechphysics.data-anSocial and Information NetworksApplicationsMethodologyq-fin.RMq-fin.ST

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
12works
0followers
8topics
3close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

12 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

From the multi-terms urn model to the self-exciting negative binomial distribution and Hawkes processes

This study considers a new multi-term urn process that has a correlation in the same term and temporal correlation. The objective is to clarify the relationship between the urn model and the Hawkes process. Correlation in the same term is represented by the Pólya urn model and the temporal correlation is incorporated by introducing the conditional initial condition. In the double-scaling limit of this urn process, the self-exciting negative binomial distribution (SE-NBD) process, which is a marked Hawkes process, is obtained. In the standard continuous limit, this process becomes the Hawkes process, which has no correlation in the same term. The difference is the variance of the intensity function in that the phase transition from the steady to the non-steady state can be observed. The critical point, at which the power law distribution is obtained, is the same for the Hawkes and the urn processes. These two processes are used to analyze empirical data of financial default to estimate the parameters of the model. For the default portfolio, the results produced by the urn process are superior to those obtained with the Hawkes process and confirm self-excitation.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Multi-Dimensional self-exciting NBD process and Default portfolios

In this study, we apply a multidimensional self-exciting negative binomial distribution (SE-NBD) process to default portfolios with 13 sectors. The SE-NBD process is a Poisson process with a gamma-distributed intensity function. We extend the SE-NBD process to a multidimensional process. Using the multidimensional SE-NBD process (MD-SE-NBD), we can estimate interactions between these 13 sectors as a network. By applying impact analysis, we can classify upstream and downstream sectors. The upstream sectors are real-estate and financial institution (FI) sectors. From these upstream sectors, shock spreads to the downstream sectors. This is an amplifier of the shock. This is consistent with the analysis of bubble bursts. We compare these results to the multidimensional Hawkes process (MD-Hawkes) that has a zero-variance intensity function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Phase transition in the Bayesian estimation of the default portfolio

The probability of default (PD) estimation is an important process for financial institutions. The difficulty of the estimation depends on the correlations between borrowers. In this paper, we introduce a hierarchical Bayesian estimation method using the beta binomial distribution and consider a multi-year case with a temporal correlation. A phase transition occurs when the temporal correlation decays by power decay. When the power index is less than one, the PD estimator does not converge. It is difficult to estimate the PD with limited historical data. Conversely, when the power index is greater than one, the convergence is the same as that of the binomial distribution. We provide a condition for the estimation of the PD and discuss the universality class of the phase transition. We investigate the empirical default data history of rating agencies and their Fourier transformations to confirm the form of the correlation decay. The power spectrum of the decay history seems to be 1/f, which corresponds to a long memory. But the estimated power index is much greater than one. If we collect adequate historical data,the parameters can be estimated correctly.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2015arXiv

Finite-size scaling analysis of binary stochastic processes and universality classes of information cascade phase transition

We propose a finite-size scaling analysis of binary stochastic processes $X(t)\in \{0,1\}$ based on the second moment correlation length $ξ$ for the autocorrelation function $C(t)$. The purpose is to clarify the critical properties and provide a new data analysis method for information cascades. As a simple model to represent the different behaviors of subjects in information cascade experiments, we assume that $X(t)$ is a mixture of an independent random variable that takes 1 with probability $q$ and a random variable that depends on the ratio $z$ of the variables taking 1 among recent $r$ variables. We consider two types of the probability $f(z)$ that the latter takes 1: (i) analog [$f(z)=z$] and (ii) digital [$f(z)=θ(z-1/2)$]. We study the universal functions of scaling for $ξ$ and the integrated correlation time $τ$. For finite $r$, $C(t)$ decays exponentially as a function of $t$, and there is only one stable renormalization group (RG) fixed point. In the limit $r\to \infty$, where $X(t)$ depends on all the previous variables, $C(t)$ in model (i) obeys a power law, and the system becomes scale invariant. In model (ii) with $q\neq 1/2$, there are two stable RG fixed points, which correspond to the ordered and disordered phases of the information cascade phase transition with critical exponents $β=1$ and $ν_{||}=2$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2014arXiv

Information cascade, Kirman's ant colony model, and kinetic Ising model

In this paper, we discuss a voting model in which voters can obtain information from a finite number of previous voters. There exist three groups of voters: (i) digital herders and independent voters, (ii) analog herders and independent voters, and (iii) $\tanh$-type herders. In our previous paper [1], we used the mean field approximation for case (i). In that study, if the reference number $r$ is above three, phase transition occurs and the solution converges to one of the equilibria. However, the conclusion is different from mean field approximation. In this paper, we show that the solution oscillates between the two states. A good (bad) equilibrium is where a majority of $r$ select the correct (wrong) candidate. In this paper, we show that there is no phase transition when $r$ is finite. If the annealing schedule is adequately slow from finite $r$ to infinite $r$, the voting rate converges only to the good equilibrium. In case (ii), the state of reference votes is equivalent to that of Kirman's ant colony model, and it follows beta binomial distribution. In case (iii), we show that the model is equivalent to the finite-size kinetic Ising model. If the voters are rational, a simple herding experiment of information cascade is conducted. Information cascade results from the quenching of the kinetic Ising model.As case (i) is the limit of case (iii) when $\tanh$ function becomes a step function, the phase transition can be observed in infinite size limit. We can confirm that there is no phase transition when the reference number $r$ is finite.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Collective Adoption of Max-Min Strategy in an Information Cascade Voting Experiment

We consider a situation where one has to choose an option with multiplier m. The multiplier is inversely proportional to the number of people who have chosen the option and is proportional to the return if it is correct. If one does not know the correct option, we call him a herder, and then there is a zero-sum game between the herder and other people who have set the multiplier. The max-min strategy where one divides one&#39;s choice inversely proportional to m is optimal from the viewpoint of the maximization of expected return. We call the optimal herder an analog herder. The system of analog herders takes the probability of correct choice to one for any value of the ratio of herders, p<1, in the thermodynamic limit if the accuracy of the choice of informed person q is one. We study how herders choose by a voting experiment in which 50 to 60 subjects sequentially answer a two-choice quiz. We show that the probability of selecting a choice by the herders is inversely proportional to m for 4/3 < m < 4 and they collectively adopt the max-min strategy in that range.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Phase transition to two-peaks phase in an information cascade voting experiment

Observational learning is an important information aggregation mechanism. However, it occasionally leads to a state in which an entire population chooses a sub-optimal option. When it occurs and whether it is a phase transition remain unanswered. To address these questions, we performed a voting experiment in which subjects answered a two-choice quiz sequentially with and without information about the prior subjects&#39; choices. The subjects who could copy others are called herders. We obtained a microscopic rule regarding how herders copy others. Varying the ratio of herders led to qualitative changes in the macroscopic behavior in the experiment of about 50 subjects. If the ratio is small, the sequence of choices rapidly converges to the true one. As the ratio approaches 100%, convergence becomes extremely slow and information aggregation almost terminates. A simulation study of a stochastic model for 10^{6} subjects based on the herder&#39;s microscopic rule showed a phase transition to the two-peaks phase, where the convergence completely terminates, as the ratio exceeds some critical value.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Two kinds of Phase transitions in a Voting model

In this paper, we discuss a voting model with two candidates, C_0 and C_1. We consider two types of voters--herders and independents. The voting of independents is based on their fundamental values; on the other hand, the voting of herders is based on the number of previous votes. We can identify two kinds of phase transitions. One is an information cascade transition similar to a phase transition seen in Ising model. The other is a transition of super and normal diffusions. These phase transitions coexist. We compared our results to the conclusions of experiments and identified the phase transitions in the upper limit of the time t by using analysis of human behavior obtained from experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2011arXiv

Digital herders and phase transition in a voting model

In this paper, we discuss a voting model with two candidates, C_1 and C_2. We set two types of voters--herders and independents. The voting of independent voters is based on their fundamental values; on the other hand, the voting of herders is based on the number of votes. Herders always select the majority of the previous $r$ votes, which is visible to them. We call them digital herders. We can accurately calculate the distribution of votes for special cases. When r>=3, we find that a phase transition occurs at the upper limit of t, where t is the discrete time (or number of votes). As the fraction of herders increases, the model features a phase transition beyond which a state where most voters make the correct choice coexists with one where most of them are wrong. On the other hand, when r<3, there is no phase transition. In this case, the herders&#39; performance is the same as that of the independent voters. Finally, we recognize the behavior of human beings by conducting simple experiments.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Component Ratios of Independent and Herding Betters in a Racetrack Betting Market

We study the time series data of the racetrack betting market in the Japan Racing Association (JRA). As the number of votes t increases, the win bet fraction x(t) converges to the final win bet fraction x_{f}. We observe the power law $(x(t)-x_{f})^{2} \propto t^{-β}$ with $β\simeq 0.488$. We measure the degree of the completeness of the ordering of the horses using an index AR, the horses are ranked according to the size of the win bet fraction. AR(t) also obeys the power law and behaves as $\mbox{AR}_{f}-\mbox{AR}(t)\propto t^{-γ}$ with $γ\simeq 0.589$, where AR_{f} is the final value of AR. We introduce a simple voting model with two types of voters-independent and herding. Independent voters provide information about the winning probability of the horses and herding voters decide their votes based on the popularities of the horses.This model can explain two power laws of the betting process. The component ratio of the independent voter to the herding voter is 1:3.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Exact Scale Invariance in Mixing of Binary Candidates in Voting Model

We introduce a voting model and discuss the scale invariance in the mixing of candidates. The Candidates are classified into two categories $μ\in \{0,1\}$ and are called as `binary&#39; candidates. There are in total $N=N_{0}+N_{1}$ candidates, and voters vote for them one by one. The probability that a candidate gets a vote is proportional to the number of votes. The initial number of votes (`seed&#39;) of a candidate $μ$ is set to be $s_μ$. After infinite counts of voting, the probability function of the share of votes of the candidate $μ$ obeys gamma distributions with the shape exponent $s_μ$ in the thermodynamic limit $Z_{0}=N_{1}s_{1}+N_{0}s_{0}\to \infty$. Between the cumulative functions $\{x_μ\}$ of binary candidates, the power-law relation $1-x_{1} \sim (1-x_{0})^α$ with the critical exponent $α=s_{1}/s_{0}$ holds in the region $1-x_{0},1-x_{1}<<1$. In the double scaling limit $(s_{1},s_{0})\to (0,0)$ and $Z_{0} \to \infty$ with $s_{1}/s_{0}=α$ fixed, the relation $1-x_{1}=(1-x_{0})^α$ holds exactly over the entire range $0\le x_{0},x_{1} \le 1$. We study the data on horse races obtained from the Japan Racing Association for the period 1986 to 2006 and confirm scale invariance.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Phase transition and information cascade in a voting model

We introduce a voting model that is similar to a Keynesian beauty contest and analyze it from a mathematical point of view. There are two types of voters-copycat and independent-and two candidates. Our voting model is a binomial distribution (independent voters) doped in a beta binomial distribution (copycat voters). We find that the phase transition in this system is at the upper limit of $t$, where $t$ is the time (or the number of the votes). Our model contains three phases. If copycats constitute a majority or even half of the total voters, the voting rate converges more slowly than it would in a binomial distribution. If independents constitute the majority of voters, the voting rate converges at the same rate as it would in a binomial distribution. We also study why it is difficult to estimate the conclusion of a Keynesian beauty contest when there is an information cascade.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access