Paper detail

Component Ratios of Independent and Herding Betters in a Racetrack Betting Market

We study the time series data of the racetrack betting market in the Japan Racing Association (JRA). As the number of votes t increases, the win bet fraction x(t) converges to the final win bet fraction x_{f}. We observe the power law $(x(t)-x_{f})^{2} \propto t^{-β}$ with $β\simeq 0.488$. We measure the degree of the completeness of the ordering of the horses using an index AR, the horses are ranked according to the size of the win bet fraction. AR(t) also obeys the power law and behaves as $\mbox{AR}_{f}-\mbox{AR}(t)\propto t^{-γ}$ with $γ\simeq 0.589$, where AR_{f} is the final value of AR. We introduce a simple voting model with two types of voters-independent and herding. Independent voters provide information about the winning probability of the horses and herding voters decide their votes based on the popularities of the horses.This model can explain two power laws of the betting process. The component ratio of the independent voter to the herding voter is 1:3.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.