BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Martin Genzel

Martin Genzel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information Theorymath.ITMachine Learningmath.STStatistics TheoryApplicationseess.IVmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
9topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Generic Error Bounds for the Generalized Lasso with Sub-Exponential Data

This work performs a non-asymptotic analysis of the generalized Lasso under the assumption of sub-exponential data. Our main results continue recent research on the benchmark case of (sub-)Gaussian sample distributions and thereby explore what conclusions are still valid when going beyond. While many statistical features remain unaffected (e.g., consistency and error decay rates), the key difference becomes manifested in how the complexity of the hypothesis set is measured. It turns out that the estimation error can be controlled by means of two complexity parameters that arise naturally from a generic-chaining-based proof strategy. The output model can be non-realizable, while the only requirement for the input vector is a generic concentration inequality of Bernstein-type, which can be implemented for a variety of sub-exponential distributions. This abstract approach allows us to reproduce, unify, and extend previously known guarantees for the generalized Lasso. In particular, we present applications to semi-parametric output models and phase retrieval via the lifted Lasso. Moreover, our findings are discussed in the context of sparse recovery and high-dimensional estimation problems.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning

This work is concerned with the following fundamental question in scientific machine learning: Can deep-learning-based methods solve noise-free inverse problems to near-perfect accuracy? Positive evidence is provided for the first time, focusing on a prototypical computed tomography (CT) setup. We demonstrate that an iterative end-to-end network scheme enables reconstructions close to numerical precision, comparable to classical compressed sensing strategies. Our results build on our winning submission to the recent AAPM DL-Sparse-View CT Challenge. Its goal was to identify the state-of-the-art in solving the sparse-view CT inverse problem with data-driven techniques. A specific difficulty of the challenge setup was that the precise forward model remained unknown to the participants. Therefore, a key feature of our approach was to initially estimate the unknown fanbeam geometry in a data-driven calibration step. Apart from an in-depth analysis of our methodology, we also demonstrate its state-of-the-art performance on the open-access real-world dataset LoDoPaB CT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

$\ell^1$-Analysis Minimization and Generalized (Co-)Sparsity: When Does Recovery Succeed?

This paper investigates the problem of signal estimation from undersampled noisy sub-Gaussian measurements under the assumption of a cosparse model. Based on generalized notions of sparsity, we derive novel recovery guarantees for the $\ell^1$-analysis basis pursuit, enabling accurate predictions of its sample complexity. The corresponding bounds on the number of required measurements do explicitly depend on the Gram matrix of the analysis operator and therefore particularly account for its mutual coherence structure. Our findings defy conventional wisdom which promotes the sparsity of analysis coefficients as the crucial quantity to study. In fact, this common paradigm breaks down completely in many situations of practical interest, for instance, when applying a redundant (multilevel) frame as analysis prior. By extensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that, in contrast, our theoretical sampling-rate bounds reliably capture the recovery capability of various examples, such as redundant wavelets systems, total variation, or random frames. The proofs of our main results build upon recent achievements in the convex geometry of data mining problems. More precisely, we establish a sophisticated upper bound on the conic Gaussian mean width that is associated with the underlying $\ell^1$-analysis polytope. Due to a novel localization argument, it turns out that the presented framework naturally extends to stable recovery, allowing us to incorporate compressible coefficient sequences as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Compressed Sensing with 1D Total Variation: Breaking Sample Complexity Barriers via Non-Uniform Recovery

This paper investigates total variation minimization in one spatial dimension for the recovery of gradient-sparse signals from undersampled Gaussian measurements. Recently established bounds for the required sampling rate state that uniform recovery of all $s$-gradient-sparse signals in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is only possible with $m \gtrsim \sqrt{s n} \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements. Such a condition is especially prohibitive for high-dimensional problems, where $s$ is much smaller than $n$. However, previous empirical findings seem to indicate that this sampling rate does not reflect the typical behavior of total variation minimization. The present work provides a rigorous analysis that breaks the $\sqrt{s n}$-bottleneck for a large class of "natural" signals. The main result shows that non-uniform recovery succeeds with high probability for $m \gtrsim s \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements if the jump discontinuities of the signal vector are sufficiently well separated. In particular, this guarantee allows for signals arising from a discretization of piecewise constant functions defined on an interval. The key ingredient of the proof is a novel upper bound for the associated conic Gaussian mean width, which is based on a signal-dependent, non-dyadic Haar wavelet transform. Furthermore, a natural extension to stable and robust recovery is addressed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compressed Sensing with 1D Total Variation: Breaking Sample Complexity Barriers via Non-Uniform Recovery (iTWIST'20)

This paper investigates total variation minimization in one spatial dimension for the recovery of gradient-sparse signals from undersampled Gaussian measurements. Recently established bounds for the required sampling rate state that uniform recovery of all $s$-gradient-sparse signals in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is only possible with $m \gtrsim \sqrt{s n} \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements. Such a condition is especially prohibitive for high-dimensional problems, where $s$ is much smaller than $n$. However, previous empirical findings seem to indicate that the latter sampling rate does not reflect the typical behavior of total variation minimization. Indeed, this work provides a rigorous analysis that breaks the $\sqrt{s n}$-bottleneck for a large class of natural signals. The main result shows that non-uniform recovery succeeds with high probability for $m \gtrsim s \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements if the jump discontinuities of the signal vector are sufficiently well separated. In particular, this guarantee allows for signals arising from a discretization of piecewise constant functions defined on an interval. The present paper serves as a short summary of the main results in our recent work [arxiv:2001.09952].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Recovering Structured Data From Superimposed Non-Linear Measurements

This work deals with the problem of distributed data acquisition under non-linear communication constraints. More specifically, we consider a model setup where $M$ distributed nodes take individual measurements of an unknown structured source vector $x_0 \in \mathbb{R}^n$, communicating their readings simultaneously to a central receiver. Since this procedure involves collisions and is usually imperfect, the receiver measures a superposition of non-linearly distorted signals. In a first step, we will show that an $s$-sparse vector $x_0$ can be successfully recovered from $O(s \cdot\log(2n/s))$ of such superimposed measurements, using a traditional Lasso estimator that does not rely on any knowledge about the non-linear corruptions. This direct method however fails to work for several "uncalibrated" system configurations. These blind reconstruction tasks can be easily handled with the $\ell^{1,2}$-Group-Lasso, but coming along with an increased sampling rate of $O(s\cdot \max\{M, \log(2n/s) \})$ observations - in fact, the purpose of this lifting strategy is to extend a certain class of bilinear inverse problems to non-linear acquisition. Our two algorithmic approaches are a special instance of a more abstract framework which includes sub-Gaussian measurement designs as well as general (convex) structural constraints. These results are of independent interest for various recovery and learning tasks, as they apply to arbitrary non-linear observation models. Finally, to illustrate the practical scope of our theoretical findings, an application to wireless sensor networks is discussed, which actually serves as the prototypical example of our methodology.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Robust 1-Bit Compressed Sensing via Hinge Loss Minimization

This work theoretically studies the problem of estimating a structured high-dimensional signal $x_0 \in \mathbb{R}^n$ from noisy $1$-bit Gaussian measurements. Our recovery approach is based on a simple convex program which uses the hinge loss function as data fidelity term. While such a risk minimization strategy is very natural to learn binary output models, such as in classification, its capacity to estimate a specific signal vector is largely unexplored. A major difficulty is that the hinge loss is just piecewise linear, so that its "curvature energy" is concentrated in a single point. This is substantially different from other popular loss functions considered in signal estimation, e.g., the square or logistic loss, which are at least locally strongly convex. It is therefore somewhat unexpected that we can still prove very similar types of recovery guarantees for the hinge loss estimator, even in the presence of strong noise. More specifically, our non-asymptotic error bounds show that stable and robust reconstruction of $x_0$ can be achieved with the optimal oversampling rate $O(m^{-1/2})$ in terms of the number of measurements $m$. Moreover, we permit a wide class of structural assumptions on the ground truth signal, in the sense that $x_0$ can belong to an arbitrary bounded convex set $K \subset \mathbb{R}^n$. The proofs of our main results rely on some recent advances in statistical learning theory due to Mendelson. In particular, we invoke an adapted version of Mendelson's small ball method that allows us to establish a quadratic lower bound on the error of the first order Taylor approximation of the empirical hinge loss function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?

In the past five years, deep learning methods have become state-of-the-art in solving various inverse problems. Before such approaches can find application in safety-critical fields, a verification of their reliability appears mandatory. Recent works have pointed out instabilities of deep neural networks for several image reconstruction tasks. In analogy to adversarial attacks in classification, it was shown that slight distortions in the input domain may cause severe artifacts. The present article sheds new light on this concern, by conducting an extensive study of the robustness of deep-learning-based algorithms for solving underdetermined inverse problems. This covers compressed sensing with Gaussian measurements as well as image recovery from Fourier and Radon measurements, including a real-world scenario for magnetic resonance imaging (using the NYU-fastMRI dataset). Our main focus is on computing adversarial perturbations of the measurements that maximize the reconstruction error. A distinctive feature of our approach is the quantitative and qualitative comparison with total-variation minimization, which serves as a provably robust reference method. In contrast to previous findings, our results reveal that standard end-to-end network architectures are not only resilient against statistical noise, but also against adversarial perturbations. All considered networks are trained by common deep learning techniques, without sophisticated defense strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access