BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Maximilian März

Maximilian März contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Information TheoryMachine Learningmath.ITeess.IVComputer Visionmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
7topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Near-Exact Recovery for Tomographic Inverse Problems via Deep Learning

This work is concerned with the following fundamental question in scientific machine learning: Can deep-learning-based methods solve noise-free inverse problems to near-perfect accuracy? Positive evidence is provided for the first time, focusing on a prototypical computed tomography (CT) setup. We demonstrate that an iterative end-to-end network scheme enables reconstructions close to numerical precision, comparable to classical compressed sensing strategies. Our results build on our winning submission to the recent AAPM DL-Sparse-View CT Challenge. Its goal was to identify the state-of-the-art in solving the sparse-view CT inverse problem with data-driven techniques. A specific difficulty of the challenge setup was that the precise forward model remained unknown to the participants. Therefore, a key feature of our approach was to initially estimate the unknown fanbeam geometry in a data-driven calibration step. Apart from an in-depth analysis of our methodology, we also demonstrate its state-of-the-art performance on the open-access real-world dataset LoDoPaB CT.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

$\ell^1$-Analysis Minimization and Generalized (Co-)Sparsity: When Does Recovery Succeed?

This paper investigates the problem of signal estimation from undersampled noisy sub-Gaussian measurements under the assumption of a cosparse model. Based on generalized notions of sparsity, we derive novel recovery guarantees for the $\ell^1$-analysis basis pursuit, enabling accurate predictions of its sample complexity. The corresponding bounds on the number of required measurements do explicitly depend on the Gram matrix of the analysis operator and therefore particularly account for its mutual coherence structure. Our findings defy conventional wisdom which promotes the sparsity of analysis coefficients as the crucial quantity to study. In fact, this common paradigm breaks down completely in many situations of practical interest, for instance, when applying a redundant (multilevel) frame as analysis prior. By extensive numerical experiments, we demonstrate that, in contrast, our theoretical sampling-rate bounds reliably capture the recovery capability of various examples, such as redundant wavelets systems, total variation, or random frames. The proofs of our main results build upon recent achievements in the convex geometry of data mining problems. More precisely, we establish a sophisticated upper bound on the conic Gaussian mean width that is associated with the underlying $\ell^1$-analysis polytope. Due to a novel localization argument, it turns out that the presented framework naturally extends to stable recovery, allowing us to incorporate compressible coefficient sequences as well.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Compressed Sensing with 1D Total Variation: Breaking Sample Complexity Barriers via Non-Uniform Recovery

This paper investigates total variation minimization in one spatial dimension for the recovery of gradient-sparse signals from undersampled Gaussian measurements. Recently established bounds for the required sampling rate state that uniform recovery of all $s$-gradient-sparse signals in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is only possible with $m \gtrsim \sqrt{s n} \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements. Such a condition is especially prohibitive for high-dimensional problems, where $s$ is much smaller than $n$. However, previous empirical findings seem to indicate that this sampling rate does not reflect the typical behavior of total variation minimization. The present work provides a rigorous analysis that breaks the $\sqrt{s n}$-bottleneck for a large class of "natural" signals. The main result shows that non-uniform recovery succeeds with high probability for $m \gtrsim s \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements if the jump discontinuities of the signal vector are sufficiently well separated. In particular, this guarantee allows for signals arising from a discretization of piecewise constant functions defined on an interval. The key ingredient of the proof is a novel upper bound for the associated conic Gaussian mean width, which is based on a signal-dependent, non-dyadic Haar wavelet transform. Furthermore, a natural extension to stable and robust recovery is addressed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Compressed Sensing with 1D Total Variation: Breaking Sample Complexity Barriers via Non-Uniform Recovery (iTWIST'20)

This paper investigates total variation minimization in one spatial dimension for the recovery of gradient-sparse signals from undersampled Gaussian measurements. Recently established bounds for the required sampling rate state that uniform recovery of all $s$-gradient-sparse signals in $\mathbb{R}^n$ is only possible with $m \gtrsim \sqrt{s n} \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements. Such a condition is especially prohibitive for high-dimensional problems, where $s$ is much smaller than $n$. However, previous empirical findings seem to indicate that the latter sampling rate does not reflect the typical behavior of total variation minimization. Indeed, this work provides a rigorous analysis that breaks the $\sqrt{s n}$-bottleneck for a large class of natural signals. The main result shows that non-uniform recovery succeeds with high probability for $m \gtrsim s \cdot \text{PolyLog}(n)$ measurements if the jump discontinuities of the signal vector are sufficiently well separated. In particular, this guarantee allows for signals arising from a discretization of piecewise constant functions defined on an interval. The present paper serves as a short summary of the main results in our recent work [arxiv:2001.09952].

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Interval Neural Networks as Instability Detectors for Image Reconstructions

This work investigates the detection of instabilities that may occur when utilizing deep learning models for image reconstruction tasks. Although neural networks often empirically outperform traditional reconstruction methods, their usage for sensitive medical applications remains controversial. Indeed, in a recent series of works, it has been demonstrated that deep learning approaches are susceptible to various types of instabilities, caused for instance by adversarial noise or out-of-distribution features. It is argued that this phenomenon can be observed regardless of the underlying architecture and that there is no easy remedy. Based on this insight, the present work demonstrates on two use cases how uncertainty quantification methods can be employed as instability detectors. In particular, it is shown that the recently proposed Interval Neural Networks are highly effective in revealing instabilities of reconstructions. Such an ability is crucial to ensure a safe use of deep learning-based methods for medical image reconstruction.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Interval Neural Networks: Uncertainty Scores

We propose a fast, non-Bayesian method for producing uncertainty scores in the output of pre-trained deep neural networks (DNNs) using a data-driven interval propagating network. This interval neural network (INN) has interval valued parameters and propagates its input using interval arithmetic. The INN produces sensible lower and upper bounds encompassing the ground truth. We provide theoretical justification for the validity of these bounds. Furthermore, its asymmetric uncertainty scores offer additional, directional information beyond what Gaussian-based, symmetric variance estimation can provide. We find that noise in the data is adequately captured by the intervals produced with our method. In numerical experiments on an image reconstruction task, we demonstrate the practical utility of INNs as a proxy for the prediction error in comparison to two state-of-the-art uncertainty quantification methods. In summary, INNs produce fast, theoretically justified uncertainty scores for DNNs that are easy to interpret, come with added information and pose as improved error proxies - features that may prove useful in advancing the usability of DNNs especially in sensitive applications such as health care.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Sampling Rates for $\ell^1$-Synthesis

This work investigates the problem of signal recovery from undersampled noisy sub-Gaussian measurements under the assumption of a synthesis-based sparsity model. Solving the $\ell^1$-synthesis basis pursuit allows for a simultaneous estimation of a coefficient representation as well as the sought-for signal. However, due to linear dependencies within redundant dictionary atoms it might be impossible to identify a specific representation vector, although the actual signal is still successfully recovered. The present manuscript studies both estimation problems from a non-uniform, signal-dependent perspective. By utilizing recent results on the convex geometry of linear inverse problems, the sampling rates describing the phase transitions of each formulation are identified. In both cases, they are given by the conic Gaussian mean width of an $\ell^1$-descent cone that is linearly transformed by the dictionary. In general, this expression does not allow a simple calculation by following the polarity-based approach commonly found in the literature. Hence, two upper bounds involving the sparsity of coefficient representations are provided: The first one is based on a local condition number and the second one on a geometric analysis that makes use of the thinness of high-dimensional polyhedral cones with not too many generators. It is furthermore revealed that both recovery problems can differ dramatically with respect to robustness to measurement noise -- a fact that seems to have gone unnoticed in most of the related literature. All insights are carefully undermined by numerical simulations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Solving Inverse Problems With Deep Neural Networks -- Robustness Included?

In the past five years, deep learning methods have become state-of-the-art in solving various inverse problems. Before such approaches can find application in safety-critical fields, a verification of their reliability appears mandatory. Recent works have pointed out instabilities of deep neural networks for several image reconstruction tasks. In analogy to adversarial attacks in classification, it was shown that slight distortions in the input domain may cause severe artifacts. The present article sheds new light on this concern, by conducting an extensive study of the robustness of deep-learning-based algorithms for solving underdetermined inverse problems. This covers compressed sensing with Gaussian measurements as well as image recovery from Fourier and Radon measurements, including a real-world scenario for magnetic resonance imaging (using the NYU-fastMRI dataset). Our main focus is on computing adversarial perturbations of the measurements that maximize the reconstruction error. A distinctive feature of our approach is the quantitative and qualitative comparison with total-variation minimization, which serves as a provably robust reference method. In contrast to previous findings, our results reveal that standard end-to-end network architectures are not only resilient against statistical noise, but also against adversarial perturbations. All considered networks are trained by common deep learning techniques, without sophisticated defense strategies.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access