BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Kirsti Kuenzel

Kirsti Kuenzel contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CO

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Characterizing all $K_4$-free well-edge-dominated graphs of girth 3

Given a graph $G$, a set $F$ of edges is an edge dominating set if all edges in $G$ are either in $F$ or adjacent to an edge in $F$. $G$ is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set is also minimum. In 2022, it was proven that there are precisely three nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs with girth at least four. Then in 2025, a characterization of all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle was found. In this paper, we characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs that contain a triangle and yet are $K_4$-free.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Graphs which satisfy a Vizing-like bound for power domination of Cartesian products

Power domination is a two-step observation process that is used to monitor power networks and can be viewed as a combination of domination and zero forcing. Given a graph $G$, a subset $S\subseteq V(G)$ that can observe all vertices of $G$ using this process is known as a power dominating set of $G$, and the power domination number of $G$, $γ_P(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices in a power dominating set. We introduce a new partition on the vertices of a graph to provide a lower bound for the power domination number. We also consider the power domination number of the Cartesian product of two graphs, $G \Box H$, and show certain graphs satisfy a Vizing-like bound with regards to the power domination number. In particular, we prove that for any two trees $T_1$ and $T_2$, $γ_P(T_1)γ_P(T_2) \leq γ_P(T_1 \Box T_2)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

On independent domination in direct products

In \cite{nr-1996} Nowakowski and Rall listed a series of conjectures involving several different graph products. In particular, they conjectured that $i(G\times H) \ge i(G)i(H)$ where $i(G)$ is the independent domination number of $G$ and $G\times H$ is the direct product of graphs $G$ and $H$. We show this conjecture is false, and, in fact, construct pairs of graphs for which $\min\{i(G), i(H)\} - i(G\times H)$ is arbitrarily large. We also give the exact value of $i(G\times K_n)$ when $G$ is either a path or a cycle.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Power domination in cubic graphs and Cartesian products

The power domination problem focuses on finding the optimal placement of phase measurement units (PMUs) to monitor an electrical power network. In the context of graphs, the power domination number of a graph $G$, denoted $γ_P(G)$, is the minimum number of vertices needed to observe every vertex in the graph according to a specific set of observation rules. In \cite{ZKC_cubic}, Zhao et al. proved that if $G$ is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order $n$, then $γ_P(G) \leq n/4$. In this paper, we show that if $G$ is a claw-free diamond-free cubic graph of order $n$, then $γ_P(G) \le n/6$, and this bound is sharp. We also provide new bounds on $γ_P(G \Box H)$ where $G\Box H$ is the Cartesian product of graphs $G$ and $H$. In the specific case that $G$ and $H$ are trees whose power domination number and domination number are equal, we show the Vizing-like inequality holds and $γ_P(G \Box H) \ge γ_P(G)γ_P(H)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Domination in digraphs and their products

A dominating (respectively, total dominating) set $S$ of a digraph $D$ is a set of vertices in $D$ such that the union of the closed (respectively, open) out-neighborhoods of vertices in $S$ equals the vertex set of $D$. The minimum size of a dominating (respectively, total dominating) set of $D$ is the domination (respectively, total domination) number of $D$, denoted $γ(D)$ (respectively,$γ_t(D)$). The maximum number of pairwise disjoint closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods of $D$ is denoted by $ρ(D)$ (respectively,$ρ^{\rm o}(D)$). We prove that in digraphs whose underlying graphs have girth at least $7$, the closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods enjoy the Helly property, and use these two results to prove that in any ditree $T$ (that is, a digraph whose underlying graph is a tree), $γ_t(T)=ρ^{\rm o}(T)$ and $γ(T)=ρ(T)$. By using the former equality we then prove that $γ_t(G\times T)=γ_t(G)γ_t(T)$, where $G$ is any digraph and $T$ is any ditree, each without a source vertex, and $G\times T$ is their direct product. From the equality $γ(T)=ρ(T)$ we derive the bound $γ(G\mathbin{\Box} T)\geγ(G)γ(T)$, where $G$ is an arbitrary digraph, $T$ an arbitrary ditree and $G\mathbin{\Box} T$ is their Cartesian product. In general digraphs this Vizing-type bound fails, yet we prove that for any digraphs $G$ and $H$, where $γ(G)\geγ(H)$, we have $γ(G \mathbin{\Box} H) \ge \frac{1}{2}γ(G)(γ(H) + 1)$. This inequality is sharp as demonstrated by an infinite family of examples. Ditrees $T$ and digraphs $H$ enjoying $γ(T\mathbin{\Box} H)=γ(T)γ(H)$ are also investigated.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access