Source author record

Kirsti Kuenzel

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

5works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

5 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Characterizing all K4K_4-free well-edge-dominated graphs of girth 3

Given a graph GG, a set FF of edges is an edge dominating set if all edges in GG are either in FF or adjacent to an edge in FF. GG is said to be well-edge-dominated if every minimal edge dominating set is also minimum. In 2022, it was proven that there are precisely three nonbipartite, well-edge-dominated graphs with girth at least four. Then in 2025, a characterization of all well-edge-dominated graphs containing exactly one triangle was found. In this paper, we characterize all well-edge-dominated graphs that contain a triangle and yet are K4K_4-free.

preprint2022arXiv

Graphs which satisfy a Vizing-like bound for power domination of Cartesian products

Power domination is a two-step observation process that is used to monitor power networks and can be viewed as a combination of domination and zero forcing. Given a graph GG, a subset S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) that can observe all vertices of GG using this process is known as a power dominating set of GG, and the power domination number of GG, γP(G)γ_P(G), is the minimum number of vertices in a power dominating set. We introduce a new partition on the vertices of a graph to provide a lower bound for the power domination number. We also consider the power domination number of the Cartesian product of two graphs, G□HG \Box H, and show certain graphs satisfy a Vizing-like bound with regards to the power domination number. In particular, we prove that for any two trees T1T_1 and T2T_2, γP(T1)γP(T2)≤γP(T1□T2)γ_P(T_1)γ_P(T_2) \leq γ_P(T_1 \Box T_2).

preprint2022arXiv

On independent domination in direct products

In \cite{nr-1996} Nowakowski and Rall listed a series of conjectures involving several different graph products. In particular, they conjectured that i(G×H)≥i(G)i(H)i(G\times H) \ge i(G)i(H) where i(G)i(G) is the independent domination number of GG and G×HG\times H is the direct product of graphs GG and HH. We show this conjecture is false, and, in fact, construct pairs of graphs for which min⁡{i(G),i(H)}−i(G×H)\min\{i(G), i(H)\} - i(G\times H) is arbitrarily large. We also give the exact value of i(G×Kn)i(G\times K_n) when GG is either a path or a cycle.

preprint2022arXiv

Power domination in cubic graphs and Cartesian products

The power domination problem focuses on finding the optimal placement of phase measurement units (PMUs) to monitor an electrical power network. In the context of graphs, the power domination number of a graph GG, denoted γP(G)γ_P(G), is the minimum number of vertices needed to observe every vertex in the graph according to a specific set of observation rules. In \cite{ZKC_cubic}, Zhao et al. proved that if GG is a connected claw-free cubic graph of order nn, then γP(G)≤n/4γ_P(G) \leq n/4. In this paper, we show that if GG is a claw-free diamond-free cubic graph of order nn, then γP(G)≤n/6γ_P(G) \le n/6, and this bound is sharp. We also provide new bounds on γP(G□H)γ_P(G \Box H) where G□HG\Box H is the Cartesian product of graphs GG and HH. In the specific case that GG and HH are trees whose power domination number and domination number are equal, we show the Vizing-like inequality holds and γP(G□H)≥γP(G)γP(H)γ_P(G \Box H) \ge γ_P(G)γ_P(H).

preprint2020arXiv

Domination in digraphs and their products

A dominating (respectively, total dominating) set SS of a digraph DD is a set of vertices in DD such that the union of the closed (respectively, open) out-neighborhoods of vertices in SS equals the vertex set of DD. The minimum size of a dominating (respectively, total dominating) set of DD is the domination (respectively, total domination) number of DD, denoted γ(D)γ(D) (respectively,γt(D)γ_t(D)). The maximum number of pairwise disjoint closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods of DD is denoted by ρ(D)ρ(D) (respectively,ρo(D)ρ^{\rm o}(D)). We prove that in digraphs whose underlying graphs have girth at least 77, the closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods enjoy the Helly property, and use these two results to prove that in any ditree TT (that is, a digraph whose underlying graph is a tree), γt(T)=ρo(T)γ_t(T)=ρ^{\rm o}(T) and γ(T)=ρ(T)γ(T)=ρ(T). By using the former equality we then prove that γt(G×T)=γt(G)γt(T)γ_t(G\times T)=γ_t(G)γ_t(T), where GG is any digraph and TT is any ditree, each without a source vertex, and G×TG\times T is their direct product. From the equality γ(T)=ρ(T)γ(T)=ρ(T) we derive the bound γ(G□T)≥γ(G)γ(T)γ(G\mathbin{\Box} T)\geγ(G)γ(T), where GG is an arbitrary digraph, TT an arbitrary ditree and G□TG\mathbin{\Box} T is their Cartesian product. In general digraphs this Vizing-type bound fails, yet we prove that for any digraphs GG and HH, where γ(G)≥γ(H)γ(G)\geγ(H), we have γ(G□H)≥12γ(G)(γ(H)+1)γ(G \mathbin{\Box} H) \ge \frac{1}{2}γ(G)(γ(H) + 1). This inequality is sharp as demonstrated by an infinite family of examples. Ditrees TT and digraphs HH enjoying γ(T□H)=γ(T)γ(H)γ(T\mathbin{\Box} H)=γ(T)γ(H) are also investigated.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.