Source author record

Douglas F. Rall

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

17works
2topics
4close collaborators

Published work

17 publications

preprint2026arXiv

Total isolation game in graphs

The total isolation game is played on a graph GG by two players who take turns playing a vertex such that if SS is the set of already played vertices, then a vertex can be selected only if it is adjacent to a vertex that belongs to a (nontrivial) component of the graph G−NG(S)G - N_G(S) of order at least 22 or a vertex that is isolated in G−NG(S)G - N_G(S) and belongs to the set SS, where NG(S)N_G(S) is the set of vertices adjacent to a vertex in SS. Dominator wishes to finish the game with the minimum number of played vertices, while Staller has the opposite goal. The game total isolation number ιgt(G)ι_{\rm gt}(G) is the number of moves in the Dominator-start game where both players play optimally. We prove that if GG is a connected graph of order n≥3n \ge 3, then ιgt(G)<56nι_{\rm gt}(G) < \frac{5}{6}n. Furthermore if GG has minimum degree at least 22, then we prove that ιgt(G)≤34nι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n. More generally, if GG is a connected graph of order n≥3n \ge 3 with minimum degree δδ where δ≥2δ\ge 2, then we prove that ιgt(G)≤(2δ−13δ−2)nι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \left( \frac{2δ-1}{3δ-2} \right) n. Among other results it is proved that if GG is a graph of order nn with diameter 22, then ιgt(G)≤23nι_{\rm gt}(G) \le \frac{2}{3}n.

preprint2022arXiv

On independent domination in direct products

In \cite{nr-1996} Nowakowski and Rall listed a series of conjectures involving several different graph products. In particular, they conjectured that i(G×H)≥i(G)i(H)i(G\times H) \ge i(G)i(H) where i(G)i(G) is the independent domination number of GG and G×HG\times H is the direct product of graphs GG and HH. We show this conjecture is false, and, in fact, construct pairs of graphs for which min⁡{i(G),i(H)}−i(G×H)\min\{i(G), i(H)\} - i(G\times H) is arbitrarily large. We also give the exact value of i(G×Kn)i(G\times K_n) when GG is either a path or a cycle.

preprint2020arXiv

Domination in digraphs and their products

A dominating (respectively, total dominating) set SS of a digraph DD is a set of vertices in DD such that the union of the closed (respectively, open) out-neighborhoods of vertices in SS equals the vertex set of DD. The minimum size of a dominating (respectively, total dominating) set of DD is the domination (respectively, total domination) number of DD, denoted γ(D)γ(D) (respectively,γt(D)γ_t(D)). The maximum number of pairwise disjoint closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods of DD is denoted by ρ(D)ρ(D) (respectively,ρo(D)ρ^{\rm o}(D)). We prove that in digraphs whose underlying graphs have girth at least 77, the closed (respectively,open) in-neighborhoods enjoy the Helly property, and use these two results to prove that in any ditree TT (that is, a digraph whose underlying graph is a tree), γt(T)=ρo(T)γ_t(T)=ρ^{\rm o}(T) and γ(T)=ρ(T)γ(T)=ρ(T). By using the former equality we then prove that γt(G×T)=γt(G)γt(T)γ_t(G\times T)=γ_t(G)γ_t(T), where GG is any digraph and TT is any ditree, each without a source vertex, and G×TG\times T is their direct product. From the equality γ(T)=ρ(T)γ(T)=ρ(T) we derive the bound γ(G□T)≥γ(G)γ(T)γ(G\mathbin{\Box} T)\geγ(G)γ(T), where GG is an arbitrary digraph, TT an arbitrary ditree and G□TG\mathbin{\Box} T is their Cartesian product. In general digraphs this Vizing-type bound fails, yet we prove that for any digraphs GG and HH, where γ(G)≥γ(H)γ(G)\geγ(H), we have γ(G□H)≥12γ(G)(γ(H)+1)γ(G \mathbin{\Box} H) \ge \frac{1}{2}γ(G)(γ(H) + 1). This inequality is sharp as demonstrated by an infinite family of examples. Ditrees TT and digraphs HH enjoying γ(T□H)=γ(T)γ(H)γ(T\mathbin{\Box} H)=γ(T)γ(H) are also investigated.

preprint2020arXiv

General dd-position sets

The general dd-position number gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) of a graph GG is the cardinality of a largest set SS for which no three distinct vertices from SS lie on a common geodesic of length at most dd. This new graph parameter generalizes the well studied general position number. We first give some results concerning the monotonic behavior of gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) with respect to the suitable values of dd. We show that the decision problem concerning finding gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) is NP-complete for any value of dd. The value of gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) when GG is a path or a cycle is computed and a structural characterization of general dd-position sets is shown. Moreover, we present some relationships with other topics including strong resolving graphs and dissociation sets. We finish our exposition by proving that gpd(G){\rm gp}_d(G) is infinite whenever GG is an infinite graph and dd is a finite integer.

preprint2020arXiv

On graphs having one size of maximal open packings

A set PP of vertices in a graph GG is an open packing if no two distinct vertices in PP have a common neighbor. Among all maximal open packings in GG, the smallest cardinality is denoted ρLo(G)ρ^{\rm o}_L(G) and the largest cardinality is ρo(G)ρ^{\rm o}(G). There exist graphs for which these two invariants are arbitrarily far apart. In this paper we begin the investigation of the class of graphs that have one size of maximal open packings. By presenting a method of constructing such graphs we show that every graph is the induced subgraph of a graph in this class. The main result of the paper is a structural characterization of those GG that do not have a cycle of order less than 1515 and for which ρLo(G)=ρo(G)ρ^{\rm o}_L(G)=ρ^{\rm o}(G).

preprint2020arXiv

The Enclaveless Competition Game

For a subset SS of vertices in a graph GG, a vertex v∈Sv \in S is an enclave of SS if vv and all of its neighbors are in SS, where a neighbor of vv is a vertex adjacent to vv. A set SS is enclaveless if it does not contain any enclaves. The enclaveless number Ψ(G)Ψ(G) of GG is the maximum cardinality of an enclaveless set in GG. As first observed in 1997 by Slater [J. Res. Nat. Bur. Standards 82 (1977), 197--202], if GG is a graph with nn vertices, then γ(G)+Ψ(G)=nγ(G) + Ψ(G) = n where γ(G)γ(G) is the well-studied domination number of GG. In this paper, we continue the study of the competition-enclaveless game introduced in 2001 by Phillips and Slater [Graph Theory Notes N. Y. 41 (2001), 37--41] and defined as follows. Two players take turns in constructing a maximal enclaveless set SS, where one player, Maximizer, tries to maximize ∣S∣|S| and one player, Minimizer, tries to minimize~∣S∣|S|. The competition-enclaveless game number Ψg+(G)Ψ_g^+(G) of GG is the number of vertices played when Maximizer starts the game and both players play optimally. We study among other problems the conjecture that if GG is an isolate-free graph of order nn, then Ψg+(G)≥12nΨ_g^+(G) \ge \frac{1}{2}n. We prove this conjecture for regular graphs and for claw-free graphs.

preprint2016arXiv

On minimum identifying codes in some Cartesian product graphs

An identifying code in a graph is a dominating set that also has the property that the closed neighborhood of each vertex in the graph has a distinct intersection with the set. The minimum cardinality of an identifying code, or ID code, in a graph GG is called the ID code number of GG and is denoted $\gid(G)$. In this paper, we give upper and lower bounds for the ID code number of the prism of a graph, or G□K2G\Box K_2. In particular, we show that $\gid(G \Box K_2) \ge \gid(G)$ and we show that this bound is sharp. We also give upper and lower bounds for the ID code number of grid graphs and a general upper bound for $\gid(G\Box K_2)$.

preprint2016arXiv

Packing chromatic number under local changes in a graph

The packing chromatic number χρ(G)χ_ρ(G) of a graph GG is the smallest integer kk such that there exists a kk-vertex coloring of GG in which any two vertices receiving color ii are at distance at least i+1i+1. It is proved that in the class of subcubic graphs the packing chromatic number is bigger than 1313, thus answering an open problem from [Gastineau, Togni, SS-packing colorings of cubic graphs, Discrete Math.\ 339 (2016) 2461--2470]. In addition, the packing chromatic number is investigated with respect to several local operations. In particular, if Se(G)S_e(G) is the graph obtained from a graph GG by subdividing its edge ee, then ⌊χρ(G)/2⌋+1≤χρ(Se(G))≤χρ(G)+1\left\lfloor χ_ρ(G)/2 \right\rfloor +1 \le χ_ρ(S_e(G)) \le χ_ρ(G)+1.

preprint2016arXiv

Packing chromatic number, (1,1,2,2)(1,1,2,2)-colorings, and characterizing the Petersen graph

The packing chromatic number χρ(G)χ_ρ(G) of a graph GG is the smallest integer kk such that the vertex set of GG can be partitioned into sets Π1,…,ΠkΠ_1,\ldots,Π_k, where ΠiΠ_i, i∈[k]i\in [k], is an ii-packing. The following conjecture is posed and studied: if GG is a subcubic graph, then χρ(S(G))≤5χ_ρ(S(G))\le 5, where S(G)S(G) is the subdivision of GG. The conjecture is proved for all generalized prisms of cycles. To get this result it is proved that if GG is a generalized prism of a cycle, then GG is (1,1,2,2)(1,1,2,2)-colorable if and only if GG is not the Petersen graph. The validity of the conjecture is further proved for graphs that can be obtained from generalized prisms in such a way that one of the two nn-cycles in the edge set of a generalized prism is replaced by a union of cycles among which at most one is a 5-cycle. The packing chromatic number of graphs obtained by subdividing each of its edges a fixed number of times is also considered.

preprint2016arXiv

Total Dominating Sequences in Graphs

A vertex in a graph totally dominates another vertex if they are adjacent. A sequence of vertices in a graph GG is called a total dominating sequence if every vertex vv in the sequence totally dominates at least one vertex that was not totally dominated by any vertex that precedes vv in the sequence, and at the end all vertices of GG are totally dominated. While the length of a shortest such sequence is the total domination number of GG, in this paper we investigate total dominating sequences of maximum length, which we call the Grundy total domination number, γgrt(G)γ_{\rm gr}^t(G), of GG. We provide a characterization of the graphs GG for which γgrt(G)=∣V(G)∣γ_{\rm gr}^t(G)=|V(G)| and of those for which γgrt(G)=2γ_{\rm gr}^t(G)=2. We show that if TT is a nontrivial tree of order~nn with no vertex with two or more leaf-neighbors, then γgrt(T)≥23(n+1)γ_{\rm gr}^t(T) \ge \frac{2}{3}(n+1), and characterize the extremal trees. We also prove that for k≥3k \ge 3, if GG is a connected kk-regular graph of order~nn different from Kk,kK_{k,k}, then γgrt(G)≥(n+⌈k2⌉−2)/(k−1)γ_{\rm gr}^t(G) \ge (n + \lceil \frac{k}{2} \rceil - 2)/(k-1) if GG is not bipartite and γgrt(G)≥(n+2⌈k2⌉−4)/(k−1)γ_{\rm gr}^t(G) \ge (n + 2\lceil \frac{k}{2} \rceil - 4)/(k-1) if GG is bipartite. The Grundy total domination number is proven to be bounded from above by two times the Grundy domination number, while the former invariant can be arbitrarily smaller than the latter. Finally, a natural connection with edge covering sequences in hypergraphs is established, which in particular yields the NP-completeness of the decision version of the Grundy total domination number.

preprint2016arXiv

Trees with Equal Total Domination and Game Total Domination Numbers

In this paper, we continue the study of the total domination game in graphs introduced in [Graphs Combin. 31(5) (2015), 1453--1462], where the players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of GG. Each vertex chosen must strictly increase the number of vertices totally dominated, where a vertex totally dominates another vertex if they are neighbors. This process eventually produces a total dominating set SS of GG in which every vertex is totally dominated by a vertex in SS. Dominator wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The game total domination number, γtg(G)γ_{\rm tg}(G), (respectively, Staller-start game total domination number, γtg′(G)γ_{\rm tg}'(G)) of GG is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator (respectively, Staller) starts the game and both players play optimally. For general graphs GG, sometimes γtg(G)>γtg′(G)γ_{\rm tg}(G) > γ_{\rm tg}'(G). We show that if GG is a forest with no isolated vertex, then γtg(G)≤γtg′(G)γ_{\rm tg}(G) \le γ_{\rm tg}'(G). Using this result, we characterize the trees with equal total domination and game total domination number.

preprint2015arXiv

Progress Towards the Total Domination Game 34\frac{3}{4}-Conjecture

In this paper, we continue the study of the total domination game in graphs introduced in [Graphs Combin. 31(5) (2015), 1453--1462], where the players Dominator and Staller alternately select vertices of GG. Each vertex chosen must strictly increase the number of vertices totally dominated, where a vertex totally dominates another vertex if they are neighbors. This process eventually produces a total dominating set SS of GG in which every vertex is totally dominated by a vertex in SS. Dominator wishes to minimize the number of vertices chosen, while Staller wishes to maximize it. The game total domination number, γtg(G)γ_{\rm tg}(G), of GG is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator starts the game and both players play optimally. Henning, Klavžar and Rall [Combinatorica, to appear] posted the 34\frac{3}{4}-Game Total Domination Conjecture that states that if GG is a graph on nn vertices in which every component contains at least three vertices, then γtg(G)≤34nγ_{\rm tg}(G) \le \frac{3}{4}n. In this paper, we prove this conjecture over the class of graphs GG that satisfy both the condition that the degree sum of adjacent vertices in GG is at least 44 and the condition that no two vertices of degree 11 are at distance 44 apart in GG. In particular, we prove that by adopting a greedy strategy, Dominator can complete the total domination game played in a graph with minimum degree at least 22 in at most 3n/43n/4 moves.

preprint2013arXiv

Domination game played on trees and spanning subgraphs

The domination game is played on a graph G. Vertices are chosen, one at a time, by two players Dominator and Staller. Each chosen vertex must enlarge the set of vertices of G dominated to that point in the game. Both players use an optimal strategy---Dominator plays so as to end the game as quickly as possible while Staller plays in such a way that the game lasts as many steps as possible. The game domination number of G is the number of vertices chosen when Dominator starts the game and the Staller-start game domination number of G when Staller starts the game. In this paper these two games are studied when played on trees and spanning subgraphs. A lower bound for the game domination number of a tree in terms of the order and maximum degree is proved and shown to be asymptotically tight. It is shown that for every k, there is a tree T with game domination number k and Staller-start game domination number k+1, and it is conjectured that there is no tree with game domination number k and Staller-start game domination number k-1. A relation between the game domination number of a graph and its spanning subgraphs is considered. It is proved that for any positive integer n, there exists a graph G and its spanning tree T such that the game domination number of G is at least n more than the game domination number of T. Moreover, there exist 3-connected graphs G having a spanning subgraph such that the game domination number of the spanning subgraph is arbitrarily smaller than that of G.

preprint2013arXiv

Rainbow domination in the lexicographic product of graphs

Let k be a positive integer and let f be a map from V(G) to the set of all subsets of {1,2,3,...,k}. The function f is called a k-rainbow dominating function of G provided that whenever u is a vertex of G such that f(u) is the empty set, then for each integer r in {1,2,3,...,k} there is a neighbor x of u such that f(x) contains r. The k-rainbow domination number of G is the minimum sum (over all the vertices of G) of the cardinalities of the subsets assigned by a k-rainbow dominating function of G. The k-rainbow domination number of G is the ordinary domination number of the Cartesian product of G and a complete graph of order k. We focus on the 2-rainbow domination number of the lexicographic product of graphs and prove sharp lower and upper bounds for this number. In fact, we prove the exact value of the 2-rainbow domination number of the lexicographic product of G with H in terms of domination invariants of G, except for the case when H has 2-rainbow domination number 3 and there is a minimum 2-rainbow dominating function of H such that some vertex in H is assigned the label {1,2}.

preprint2012arXiv

Identifying codes of the direct product of two cliques

An identifying code in a graph is a dominating set that also has the property that the closed neighborhood of each vertex in the graph has a distinct intersection with the set. It was recently shown by Gravier, Moncel and Semri that the minimum cardinality of an identifying code for the Cartesian product of two cliques of the same order n is the floor of 3n/2. We consider identifying codes of the direct product of two cliques. In particular, we answer a question of Klavzar and determine the minimum cardinality of an identifying code for the direct product of any two cliques.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.