Source author record

Houston Schuerger

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

2works
1topics
4close collaborators

Published work

2 publications

preprint2022arXiv

Computer assisted discovery: Zero forcing vs vertex cover

In this paper, we showcase the process of using an automated conjecturing program called \emph{TxGraffiti} written and maintained by the second author. We begin by proving a conjecture formulated by \emph{TxGraffiti} that for a claw-free graph GG, the vertex cover number β(G)β(G) is greater than or equal to the zero forcing number Z(G)Z(G). Our proof of this result is constructive, and yields a polynomial time algorithm to find a zero forcing set with cardinality β(G)β(G). We also use the output of \emph{TxGraffiti} to construct several infinite families of claw-free graphs for which Z(G)=β(G)Z(G)=β(G). Additionally, inspired by the aforementioned conjecture of \emph{TxGraffiti}, we also prove a more general relation between the zero forcing number and the vertex cover number for any connected graph with maximum degree Δ≥3Δ\ge 3, namely that Z(G)≤(Δ−2)β(G)Z(G)\leq (Δ-2)β(G)+1.

preprint2022arXiv

Graphs which satisfy a Vizing-like bound for power domination of Cartesian products

Power domination is a two-step observation process that is used to monitor power networks and can be viewed as a combination of domination and zero forcing. Given a graph GG, a subset S⊆V(G)S\subseteq V(G) that can observe all vertices of GG using this process is known as a power dominating set of GG, and the power domination number of GG, γP(G)γ_P(G), is the minimum number of vertices in a power dominating set. We introduce a new partition on the vertices of a graph to provide a lower bound for the power domination number. We also consider the power domination number of the Cartesian product of two graphs, G□HG \Box H, and show certain graphs satisfy a Vizing-like bound with regards to the power domination number. In particular, we prove that for any two trees T1T_1 and T2T_2, γP(T1)γP(T2)≤γP(T1□T2)γ_P(T_1)γ_P(T_2) \leq γ_P(T_1 \Box T_2).

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.