Researcher profile

Jeff M. Phillips

Jeff M. Phillips contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2026arXiv

Optimizing Computational-Statistical Runtime for Wasserstein Distance Estimation

Squared Wasserstein distance is a frequently used tool to measure discrepancy between probability distributions. This distance is typically computed between empirical measures of size $n$ from two underlying random samples. Unfortunately, even in lower dimensional Euclidean space problems $\left( d \in \{2,3\} \right)$, algorithms for Wasserstein distance computation with approximate or exact precision guarantees scale poorly in the runtime as a function of $n$ and the desired precision. In response, we consider the computational-statistical runtime, where the goal is to estimate from samples the Wasserstein distance between potentially smooth measures up to $ε$-additive error in expectation with respect to the sampling; we allow $O(1)$ computational cost for collecting a sample. Towards this, we develop a Sample-Sketch-Solve paradigm where we introduce a regular cartesian grid sketch of the samples. We show that (especially under $α$-Hölder smooth distributions) this can compress the data without increasing asymptotic error, and also regularizes the structure which enables faster exact algorithms. Ultimately, we approximate $W_2^2(P,Q)$ within $ε$ error in $ε^{-\max(2,\frac{d+1+o(1)}{1+α})}$ time for $0 < α< 1$ Hölder smooth distributions $P,Q$ on $(0,1)^{d}$; an optimal $Θ(ε^{-2})$ for $α> 1/2$ when $d=2$ and nearly optimal as $α\to 1$ when $d = 3$.

preprint2026arXiv

TabKDE: Simple and Scalable Tabular Data Generation with Kernel Density Estimates

Tabular data generation considers a large table with multiple columns -- each column comprised of numerical, categorical, or sometimes ordinal values. The goal is to produce new rows for the table that replicate the distribution of rows from the original data -- without just copying those initial rows. The last 4 years have seen enormous progress on this problem, mostly using computational expensive methods that employ one-hot encoding, VAEs, and diffusion. This paper describes a new approach to the problem of tabular data generation. By employing copula transformations and modeling the distribution as a kernel density estimate we can nearly match the accuracy and leakage-avoidance achievements of the previous methods, but with almost no training time. Our method is very scalable, and can be run on data sets orders of magnitude larger than prior state-of-the-art on a simple laptop. Moreover, because we employ kernel density estimates, we can store the model as a coreset of the original data -- we believe the first for generative modeling -- and as a result, require significantly less space as well. Our code is available here: \url{https://github.com/tabkde/tabkde-main}

preprint2020arXiv

The GaussianSketch for Almost Relative Error Kernel Distance

We introduce two versions of a new sketch for approximately embedding the Gaussian kernel into Euclidean inner product space. These work by truncating infinite expansions of the Gaussian kernel, and carefully invoking the RecursiveTensorSketch [Ahle et al. SODA 2020]. After providing concentration and approximation properties of these sketches, we use them to approximate the kernel distance between points sets. These sketches yield almost $(1+\varepsilon)$-relative error, but with a small additive $α$ term. In the first variants the dependence on $1/α$ is poly-logarithmic, but has higher degree of polynomial dependence on the original dimension $d$. In the second variant, the dependence on $1/α$ is still poly-logarithmic, but the dependence on $d$ is linear.

preprint2010arXiv

A Unified Algorithmic Framework for Multi-Dimensional Scaling

In this paper, we propose a unified algorithmic framework for solving many known variants of \mds. Our algorithm is a simple iterative scheme with guaranteed convergence, and is \emph{modular}; by changing the internals of a single subroutine in the algorithm, we can switch cost functions and target spaces easily. In addition to the formal guarantees of convergence, our algorithms are accurate; in most cases, they converge to better quality solutions than existing methods, in comparable time. We expect that this framework will be useful for a number of \mds variants that have not yet been studied. Our framework extends to embedding high-dimensional points lying on a sphere to points on a lower dimensional sphere, preserving geodesic distances. As a compliment to this result, we also extend the Johnson-Lindenstrauss Lemma to this spherical setting, where projecting to a random $O((1/\eps^2) \log n)$-dimensional sphere causes $\eps$-distortion.

preprint2010arXiv

Stability of epsilon-Kernels

Given a set P of n points in |R^d, an eps-kernel K subset P approximates the directional width of P in every direction within a relative (1-eps) factor. In this paper we study the stability of eps-kernels under dynamic insertion and deletion of points to P and by changing the approximation factor eps. In the first case, we say an algorithm for dynamically maintaining a eps-kernel is stable if at most O(1) points change in K as one point is inserted or deleted from P. We describe an algorithm to maintain an eps-kernel of size O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}) in O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2} + log n) time per update. Not only does our algorithm maintain a stable eps-kernel, its update time is faster than any known algorithm that maintains an eps-kernel of size O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}). Next, we show that if there is an eps-kernel of P of size k, which may be dramatically less than O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}), then there is an (eps/2)-kernel of P of size O(min {1/eps^{(d-1)/2}, k^{floor(d/2)} log^{d-2} (1/eps)}). Moreover, there exists a point set P in |R^d and a parameter eps > 0 such that if every eps-kernel of P has size at least k, then any (eps/2)-kernel of P has size Omega(k^{floor(d/2)}).