Paper detail

Lower Bounds for Number-in-Hand Multiparty Communication Complexity, Made Easy

In this paper we prove lower bounds on randomized multiparty communication complexity, both in the \emph{blackboard model} (where each message is written on a blackboard for all players to see) and (mainly) in the \emph{message-passing model}, where messages are sent player-to-player. We introduce a new technique for proving such bounds, called \emph{symmetrization}, which is natural, intuitive, and often easy to use. For example, for the problem where each of $k$ players gets a bit-vector of length $n$, and the goal is to compute the coordinate-wise XOR of these vectors, we prove a tight lower bounds of $Ω(nk)$ in the blackboard model. For the same problem with AND instead of XOR, we prove a lower bounds of roughly $Ω(nk)$ in the message-passing model (assuming $k \le n/3200$) and $Ω(n \log k)$ in the blackboard model. We also prove lower bounds for bit-wise majority, for a graph-connectivity problem, and for other problems; the technique seems applicable to a wide range of other problems as well. All of our lower bounds allow randomized communication protocols with two-sided error. We also use the symmetrization technique to prove several direct-sum-like results for multiparty communication.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.