Paper detail

Stability of epsilon-Kernels

Given a set P of n points in |R^d, an eps-kernel K subset P approximates the directional width of P in every direction within a relative (1-eps) factor. In this paper we study the stability of eps-kernels under dynamic insertion and deletion of points to P and by changing the approximation factor eps. In the first case, we say an algorithm for dynamically maintaining a eps-kernel is stable if at most O(1) points change in K as one point is inserted or deleted from P. We describe an algorithm to maintain an eps-kernel of size O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}) in O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2} + log n) time per update. Not only does our algorithm maintain a stable eps-kernel, its update time is faster than any known algorithm that maintains an eps-kernel of size O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}). Next, we show that if there is an eps-kernel of P of size k, which may be dramatically less than O(1/eps^{(d-1)/2}), then there is an (eps/2)-kernel of P of size O(min {1/eps^{(d-1)/2}, k^{floor(d/2)} log^{d-2} (1/eps)}). Moreover, there exists a point set P in |R^d and a parameter eps > 0 such that if every eps-kernel of P has size at least k, then any (eps/2)-kernel of P has size Omega(k^{floor(d/2)}).

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.