BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Jan Vondrak

Jan Vondrak contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsDiscrete MathematicsComputer Science and Game TheoryDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingMachine Learning

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 19 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
5works
0followers
5topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

5 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Estimating the Nash Social Welfare for coverage and other submodular valuations

We study the Nash Social Welfare problem: Given $n$ agents with valuation functions $v_i:2^{[m]} \rightarrow {\mathbb R}$, partition $[m]$ into $S_1,\ldots,S_n$ so as to maximize $(\prod_{i=1}^{n} v_i(S_i))^{1/n}$. The problem has been shown to admit a constant-factor approximation for additive, budget-additive, and piecewise linear concave separable valuations; the case of submodular valuations is open. We provide a $\frac{1}{e} (1-\frac{1}{e})^2$-approximation of the {\em optimal value} for several classes of submodular valuations: coverage, sums of matroid rank functions, and certain matching-based valuations.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

A polynomial lower bound on adaptive complexity of submodular maximization

In large-data applications, it is desirable to design algorithms with a high degree of parallelization. In the context of submodular optimization, adaptive complexity has become a widely-used measure of an algorithm&#39;s &#34;sequentiality&#34;. Algorithms in the adaptive model proceed in rounds, and can issue polynomially many queries to a function $f$ in each round. The queries in each round must be independent, produced by a computation that depends only on query results obtained in previous rounds. In this work, we examine two fundamental variants of submodular maximization in the adaptive complexity model: cardinality-constrained monotone maximization, and unconstrained non-mono-tone maximization. Our main result is that an $r$-round algorithm for cardinality-constrained monotone maximization cannot achieve an approximation factor better than $1 - 1/e - Ω(\min \{ \frac{1}{r}, \frac{\log^2 n}{r^3} \})$, for any $r < n^c$ (where $c>0$ is some constant). This is the first result showing that the number of rounds must blow up polynomially large as we approach the optimal factor of $1-1/e$. For the unconstrained non-monotone maximization problem, we show a positive result: For every instance, and every $δ>0$, either we obtain a $(1/2-δ)$-approximation in $1$ round, or a $(1/2+Ω(δ^2))$-approximation in $O(1/δ^2)$ rounds. In particular (and in contrast to the cardinality-constrained case), there cannot be an instance where (i) it is impossible to achieve an approximation factor better than $1/2$ regardless of the number of rounds, and (ii) it takes $r$ rounds to achieve a factor of $1/2-O(1/r)$.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Submodular Maximization Through Barrier Functions

In this paper, we introduce a novel technique for constrained submodular maximization, inspired by barrier functions in continuous optimization. This connection not only improves the running time for constrained submodular maximization but also provides the state of the art guarantee. More precisely, for maximizing a monotone submodular function subject to the combination of a $k$-matchoid and $\ell$-knapsack constraint (for $\ell\leq k$), we propose a potential function that can be approximately minimized. Once we minimize the potential function up to an $ε$ error it is guaranteed that we have found a feasible set with a $2(k+1+ε)$-approximation factor which can indeed be further improved to $(k+1+ε)$ by an enumeration technique. We extensively evaluate the performance of our proposed algorithm over several real-world applications, including a movie recommendation system, summarization tasks for YouTube videos, Twitter feeds and Yelp business locations, and a set cover problem.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

A note on concentration of submodular functions

We survey a few concentration inequalities for submodular and fractionally subadditive functions of independent random variables, implied by the entropy method for self-bounding functions. The power of these concentration bounds is that they are dimension-free, in particular implying standard deviation O(\sqrt{\E[f]}) rather than O(\sqrt{n}) which can be obtained for any 1-Lipschitz function of n variables.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Is submodularity testable?

We initiate the study of property testing of submodularity on the boolean hypercube. Submodular functions come up in a variety of applications in combinatorial optimization. For a vast range of algorithms, the existence of an oracle to a submodular function is assumed. But how does one check if this oracle indeed represents a submodular function? Consider a function f:{0,1}^n \rightarrow R. The distance to submodularity is the minimum fraction of values of $f$ that need to be modified to make f submodular. If this distance is more than epsilon > 0, then we say that f is epsilon-far from being submodular. The aim is to have an efficient procedure that, given input f that is epsilon-far from being submodular, certifies that f is not submodular. We analyze a very natural tester for this problem, and prove that it runs in subexponential time. This gives the first non-trivial tester for submodularity. On the other hand, we prove an interesting lower bound (that is, unfortunately, quite far from the upper bound) suggesting that this tester cannot be very efficient in terms of epsilon. This involves non-trivial examples of functions which are far from submodular and yet do not exhibit too many local violations. We also provide some constructions indicating the difficulty in designing a tester for submodularity. We construct a partial function defined on exponentially many points that cannot be extended to a submodular function, but any strict subset of these values can be extended to a submodular function.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access